Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2011.14.1.001

A Comparative Analysis of Forest Landscape Structures Between Famous and General Korean Forests Using Landscape Indices  

Han, Hee (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Song, Jung-Eun (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Seol, A-Ra (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Park, Jin-Han (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University)
Chung, Joo-Sang (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies / v.14, no.1, 2011 , pp. 1-11 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the landscape structures of the National and Provincial Forest Parks in the list of "100 Famous Forests of Korea" designated by Korea Forest Service by comparing them with those of the non-designated forests. Among the designated and the non-designated, 34 mountain forests were chosen respectively over all provinces of Korea. The spatial characteristics of forest landscapes were quantified as the landscape indices independently using FRAGSTATS and the two sets of results of analyses were compared each other. According to the results of the comparative study, the designated forests were found on the higher elevation with the higher average slope and the more complicated relief conditions rather than those of the non-designated. In terms of landscape structure, the designated forests show the larger average patch size, the lower edge density and the higher diversity of landscape components. These results indicate that the more hilly mountain forests with the more complicated spatial distribution patterns of patches are the characteristics of the designated forests. The indices of the forest landscape structure would be useful in understanding the perception of forest landscape.
Keywords
Landscape Perception; Forest Landscape Structure; Landscape Indices; FRAGSTATS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김상욱, 박종화. 2001. 북한도시지역의 산림파편화 변화조사. 환경영향평가 10(1):39-47.
2 박경훈, 정성관, 권진오, 오정학. 2005. 토지이용변화에 따른 낙동강 유역 산림경관의 구조적 패턴 분석. 농촌계획학회지 11(4):47-57.
3 산림청. 2009. 간추린 임업통계, 2009. 106쪽.
4 산림청. 2010. http://www.foreston.go.kr/.
5 서주환, 조영배, 이준근. 2002. 형태지수를 이용한 농촌경관의 선호성 분석에 관한 연구. 한국산림휴양학회지 6(2):7-14.
6 서주환, 최현상, 김상범, 이철민. 1999. 형태지수를 이용한 도로경관의 선호성 분석에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 27(4):87-93.
7 이금삼, 조화룡. 1998. GIS기법에 의한 한국의 고도.기복량 분석. 대한지리학회지 33(4): 487-497.
8 정성관, 오정학, 박경훈. 2005. 경관지수를 활용한 낙동강 유역 산림경관의 시계열적 패턴 분석. 한국지리정보학회지 8(2):145-156.
9 정주상, 박필선, 조재창, 김선영, 설아라, 송정은, 장광민, 한희, 김경윤, 이윤미. 2009. 임분과 경관수준의 임업경영평가모델 개발. 산림청 연구보고서. 141쪽.
10 최기만, 이춘석, 임승빈. 1997. GIS를 이용한 가시권정보 분석기법에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 25(2):31-42.
11 최원영, 정성관, 오정학, 유주한. 2005. 경관지수와 생태계용역가치를 활용한 대구광역도시권 경관의 구조적.기능적 변화 분석. 한국지리정보학회지 8(4):102-113.
12 허성구, 김기성, 안재훈, 윤정숙, 임경재, 최중대, 신용철, 유창원. 2007. FRAGSTATS모형을 이용한 도암댐 유역의 산림 파편화 분석. 한국지리정보학회지 10(1):10-21.
13 황철수. 2008. 대단위 개발에 토지이용변화의 공간통계적 분석: 전역적 경관구조 지수 분석을 중심으로. 지리학연구 42(4):647-658.
14 Bell, S. and D. Apostol. 2008. Designing Sustainable Forest Landscapes. Taylor & Francis, New York. 356pp.
15 Bishop, I.D. and D.W. Hulse. 1994. Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning 30(1):59-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Daniel, T.C. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 54(4):267-281.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Davis, L.S., K.N. Johnson, P.S. Bettinger, T.E. Howard. 2001. Forest Management: to Sustain Ecological, Economic, and Social Values. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 804pp.
18 De La Fuente De Val, G., J.A. Atauri, J.V. de Lucio. 2006. Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 77(4):393-407.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Dramstad, W.E., M. Suldli Tveit, W.J. Ejellstad, G.L.A. Fry. 2006. Relationshipes between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 78(4):465-474.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Magarigal, K. and B. Mark. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service. 122pp.
21 Tress, B., G. Tress, H. Decamps, A.M. d'Hauteserre. 2001. Bridging human and natural science in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57(3):137-141.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Palmer, J.F. 2004. Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing ladnscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning 69(2):201-218.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Tischendorf, L. 2001. Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently?. Landscape Ecology 16(3):235-254.   DOI   ScienceOn