Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7859/kief.2012.19.6.015

A Comparative Analysis Between an UPDP of Namhansan Elementary School and a DQIfS in U.K.  

Koh, In-Lyong (공주대 건축학부)
Kang, Tae-Woong (단국대 건축학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities / v.19, no.6, 2012 , pp. 15-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
Two government affiliated research institutes, EDUMAC and AURI, are developing some tools for an user participating design process in public recently. The tools are originated from DQI/DQIfS, launched in 2002 by CIC(Construction Industry Council) in U.K.. At the beginning DQI/DQIfS was not a tool for making a decision but for a communication between layman and experts of architectural process. Because of this intent the most crucial thing is not DQI/DQIfS itself but how to use the tool: CIC is trying to develop various ways of facilitation. Domestic situation is no exception. Without a proper tool there were an independent user participating process in 2001 and it must have been the first participating process in architectural discourse. Through the seven workshops, the users of Namhansan elementary school drew not only the vision of the school but also concrete requirements which have been continuously adopted so far. The aims of this paper to analyse two facilitation processes: DQI/DQIfS in U.K. and the case of Namhansan process. Even not a proper tools for the process there was a spontaneous facilitation in Namhansan process. When we make a comparison between the Namhansan process and the DQI/DQIfS process there are considerable similarities in terms not only of the process itself but also the results. It shows that there are possibilities to make a Korean facilitation in a user participating process and this study must be the first step.
Keywords
User participating design process; DQI; DQIfS; facilitation; Namhansan elementary school; facilitator;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Henry Sanoff, Community Participation in School Planning: Case Studies of Engagement in School Facilitier, VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Lexington,KY, 2010
2 Henry Sanoff ,Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999
3 Seo, Kun-Won, An Ethnographic Case Study on the Formation of Educational Community, The Korean Society For The Study Of Anthropology Of Education. 7(1), pp.211-244, 2004
4 Jakunhakkyoyeondae, Jakun Hakkyo Hangbockhan aidul, Urikyouyok, .2009 (작은학교교교육연대, 작은 학교 행복한 아이들, 우리교육, 2009)
5 Kang, byeori, Cho, sunhyeo, Edula! dulkkochpinun hakkyoesunolja, Pulonnamoo, 2010 (강벼리 조선혜, 애들아! 들꽃피는 학교에서 놀자 -안순억교사와 남한산학교 이야기-, 푸른나무, 2010)
6 http://www.namhansan.es.kr, site accessed 2002, 2004, 2011
7 Kang, Taewoong, Understanding User Participated Design Process by menas of DQI, Korean architects, 505, pp.88-93, 2011
8 Kang, Taewoong, Understanding User Participated Design Process by menas of DQI, Korean architects, 506, pp.77-83, 2011
9 Leee, Hwa-Ryong, Report on the Briefing Workshop for Design Quality Indicator(DQI for School) held at St. Mary Magdalen Junior School, Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 17(5), pp25-30,. 2010   과학기술학회마을
10 Kim, Seung-Je, Kang, Tae-Woong, So, Kab-Soo, Yun, Yong-Gib, Kim, Jong-Hun, Study on DQI Process of User Involved In U.K. Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities, 17(2), pp.23-30, 2010   과학기술학회마을
11 Henry Sanoff, Designing with Community Participation, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg,Pennsylvania, 1978