Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.21598/JKPNFA.2017.15.3.373

Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Function on Mode of Delivery  

Kwon, Yu-Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, Dong-Eui Institute of Technology)
Lee, Hyun-Ok (Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Pusan)
Publication Information
PNF and Movement / v.15, no.3, 2017 , pp. 373-380 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate of the effects of the mode of delivery on pelvic floor muscle function by examining bladder base movement and urinary incontinence. Methods: This study was conducted on 100 females who had delivered in the previous 3-8 months. There were 2 groups: 56 vaginal deliveries and 44 cesarean section deliveries. Prior to the study, a survey was conducted on the subjects' general status, delivery mode, urinary incontinence, and physical activity. The groups could not be blinded due to scar tissue from the operations. The function of the pelvic floor muscle was observed with the bladder base movement using transabdominal ultrasound during pelvic floor contraction. To objectify and measure the subjective symptoms of subjects suffering from urinary incontinence, an incontinence quality of life (I-QoL) test was administered. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS version 20.0. An independent t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of pelvic floor muscle function between the 2 groups after delivery. Results: The movement of the bladder base in the pelvic floor muscle function was decreased in the vaginal delivery group, but the difference was not significant. Urinary incontinence was significantly increased in the vaginal delivery group. Conclusion: The function of the pelvic floor muscles was better in the cesarean section group and the incidence of urinary incontinence was relatively low in this group. Therefore, vaginal delivery requires more efforts to restore the function of the pelvic floor muscles than cesarean delivery.
Keywords
Vaginal delivery; Cesarean section; Pelvic floor muscle;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Albert HB, Godskesen M, Westergaard JG. Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Spine. 2002;27(24):2831-2834.   DOI
2 Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, et al. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neuro-physiological study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1990; 97(9):770-779.   DOI
3 Al-took S, Platt R, Tulandi T. Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction after gynecologic operations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;180(2): 313-315.   DOI
4 Aniebue UU. Symphyseal diastasis following vaginal deliveries: a report of two cases. West African Journal of Medicine. 2008;27(1):47-49.
5 Bo K, Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Physical Therapy. 2005;85(3): 269-282.
6 Boraiah S, Krishna SA, Rangappa SS. Rare occurrence of symphysis pubis diastasis following normal vaginal delivery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 2013;63(6):418-419.   DOI
7 Carine R, Omna MRC, Jeanne M, et al. Questioning the indicators of need for obstetric care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2002;80(4):317-324.
8 Olsson C, Nilsson-Wikmar L. Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2004; 83(4):351-357.   DOI
9 Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, et al. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QoL). Urology. 1999;53(1):71-76.   DOI
10 Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Slieker MC, Vierhout ME, et al. Relations between pregnancy related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2005;16(6):468-474.   DOI
11 Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Vleeming A, Stoekart.R, et al. Insufficient lumbo-pelvic stability: a Clinical anatomical and biomechanical approach to a-specific low back pain. Manual Therapy. 1998;3(1):12-20.   DOI
12 Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, et al. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348(10):900-907.   DOI
13 Sancho MF, Pascoal AG, Mota P, et al. Abdominal exercises affect inter-rectus distance in postpartum women: a two-dimensional ultrasound study. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(3):286-291.   DOI
14 Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;117(12):1485-1492.   DOI
15 Sherburn. M, Murphy CA, Carroll S, et al. Investigation of trasabdominal real-time ultrasound to visualise the muscles of the pelvic floor. The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2005;51(3):167-170.   DOI
16 Shim JH, Oh DW. Case report: physiotherapy strategies for a woman with symphysis pubis diastasis occurring during labour. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(1):89-91.   DOI
17 Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, et al. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology. 1996;47(1):67-71.   DOI
18 Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, et al. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. The British Journal of surgery. 1990;77(12):1358-1360.   DOI
19 Thom DH, Rortveit G. Prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2010;89(12):1511- 1522.   DOI
20 Thompson JA, O'sullivan PB, Briffa K. Assessment of pelvic floor movement using transabdominal and trasperineal ultrasound. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2005;16(4):285-292.   DOI
21 Weis CA, Triano JJ, Barrett J, et al. Ultrasound assessment of abdominal muscle thickness in postpartum women vs nulliparous women. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2015;38(5):352-357.   DOI
22 Yoo JJ, Ha YC, Lee YK, et al. Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic peripartum diastasis of pubic symphysis. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2014;29(2):281-286.   DOI
23 Frawley H, Galea M, Phillips B, et al. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and tools. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2006;25(3):236-242.   DOI
24 DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, et al. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;101(1):46-53.   DOI
25 Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;106:707-712.   DOI
26 Dietz HP. Pelvic floor trauma following vaginal delivery. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006; 18(5):528-537.   DOI
27 Kainu JP, Sarvela J, Tiippana E, et al. Persistent pain after caesarean section and vaginal birth: a cohort study. International journal of obstetric anesthesia. 2010;19(1):4-9.   DOI
28 Kim HR. Comparison between muscle activity and bladder movement during vaginal pressure change in parous women. Daegu University. Dissertation of Doctorate Degree. 2014.
29 Kligman I, Drachenberg C, Papadimitriou J, et al. Immunohistochemical demonstration of nerve fibers in pelvic adhesions. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1993;82(4):566-568.   DOI
30 Lien KC, Mooney B, Delancey JO, et al. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;103(1):31-40.   DOI
31 Lien KC, Morgan DM, Delancey JO, et al. Pudendal nerve stretch during vaginal birth: a 3D computer simulation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;192(5):1669-1676.   DOI
32 Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Seminars in perinatology. 2006;30(5):235-241.   DOI