Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.12.1270

Effect of Individual Differences on Online Review Perception and Usage Behavior: The Need for Cognitive Closure and Demographics  

Ma, Yoon Jin (Dept. of Family & Consumer Sciences, Illinois State University)
Hahn, Kim (The Fashion School, Kent State University)
Lee, Hyun-Hwa (Dept. of Fashion Design & Textiles, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.36, no.12, 2012 , pp. 1270-1284 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article examines how individual differences on the need for cognitive closure and demographics influence consumer perception and the usage of consumer reviews in online shopping. Data were randomly collected from 2,381 U.S. online consumer review users through an online survey. The findings from multiple regression analyses revealed the different effects of the need for cognitive closure dimensions (i.e., preference for order and structure, preference for predictability, discomfort with ambiguity, closed-mindedness, and decisiveness) and demographic characteristics on consumer attitudes, perceived online review influence, benefits, persuasiveness, and review usage behavior. Finally, practical implications and prospects for future research are discussed.
Keywords
Need for cognitive closure; Online reviews; Consumer behavior; Individual difference; Demographics;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bae, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Gender differences in consumers' perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 201−214.   DOI
2 Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133−148.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
4 Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimation nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396−402.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2005). Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the Internet. In C. P. Haugtvedt & K. A. Machleit (Eds.), Online consumer psychology: Understanding and influencing consumer behavior in the virtual world (pp. 35-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6 Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159−169.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 383−393.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 15−37.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Smith, M. R., & Gordon, R. A. (1998). Personal need for structure and attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(1), 83−87.   DOI
10 Sun, J., & Wang, X. (2010). Value differences between generations in China: A study in Shanghai. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), 65−81.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 The Retail Bulletion. (2009, October). Consumers relying on web reviews soars by 84%. The Retail Bulletion: The Complete Retail News Resources. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.theretailbulletin.com/news/consumers_relying_on_web_reviews_soars_by_84_26-10- 09/
12 The 2011 social shopping study. (2011, June). The e-tailing group and PowerReviews. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://www.powerreviews.com/assets/download/Social_Shopping_2011_Brief1.pdf
13 Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32(5), 785−811.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Through the eyes of the consumer: 2010 consumer shopping habits survey. (2010). ChannelAdvisor. Retrieved January 13, 2012, from http://go.channeladvisor.com/rs/channeladvisor/ images/us-wp-consumer-survey-2010.pdf
15 Vermeir, I., & Van Kenhove, P. (2005). The influence of need for closure and perceived time pressure on search effort for price and promotional information in a grocery shopping context. Psychology & Marketing, 22(1), 71−95.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wang, Y., Sun, S., Lei, W., & Toncar, M. (2009). Examining beliefs and attitudes toward online advertising among Chinese consumers. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(1), 52−66.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., & West, S. G. (1997). What the need for closure scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1396−1412.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6) 1049−1062.
19 Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of mouse: The role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 3−13.   DOI
20 Yao, E., Fang, R., Dineen, B. R., & Yao, X. (2009). Effects of customer feedback level and (in) consistency on new product acceptance in the click-and-mortar context. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1281−1288.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
22 Online consumer-generated reviews have significant impact on offline purchase behavior. (2007, November 29). com Score. Retrieved February 1, 2012, from www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2007/11/Online_Consumer_ Reviews_Impact_Offline_Purchasing_Behavior/
23 Ono, H., & Zavodny, M (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111−121.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Antecedents of online reviews' usage and purchase influence: An empirical comparison of U.S. and Korean consumers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 332−340.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effects of online consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125−148.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on response to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69−81.   DOI
27 Park, D. H., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386−398.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Park, H., & Cho, H. (2012). Social network online communities: Information sources for apparel shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 400−411.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381−391.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Prendergast, G., Ko, D., & Yuen, S. Y. (2010). Online word of mouth and consumer purchase intentions. International Journal of Advertising, 29(5), 687−708.   DOI
31 Putrevu, S. (2001). Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: Implications for advertisers. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10, 1-14. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http:// www.amsreview.org/articles/putrevu10-2001.pdf
32 Reichert, T., Heckler, S. E., & Jackson, S. (2001). The effects of sexual social marketing appeals on cognitive processing and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13−27.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the need for closure scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 266−280.   DOI
34 Leaptrott, J., & McDonald, J. M. (2008). Looking before leaping: The effect of owner decisiveness on small business performance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 1−12.
35 Romani, S. (2006). Price misleading advertising: Effects on trustworthiness toward the source of information and willingness to buy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(2), 130−138.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Kumar, N., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 425−439.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Lau, G. F., & Ng, S. (2001). Individual and situational factors influencing negative word of-mouth behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(3), 163−178.
38 Lee, H. H. (2012). Attributes of online review systems: An environmental design perspective. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 3(4), 158−171.   DOI
39 Lee, H. H., & Ma, Y. J. (2012). Consumer perceptions of online consumer product and service reviews: Focusing on information processing confidence and susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(2), 110−132.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Lee, M. H., Schellhase, R., Koo, D. M., & Lee, M. J. (2009). The impacts of need for cognitive closure, psychological wellbeing, and social factors on impulse purchasing. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 44−56.   DOI
41 Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth: How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgment. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473− 499.   DOI
42 Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456−474.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Moneta, G. B., & Yip, P. P. Y. (2004). Construct validity of the scores of the Chinese version of the need for closure scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 531−548.   DOI
44 Li, X., Hitt, L. M., & Zhang, Z. J. (2011). Product reviews and competition in markets for repeat purchase products. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27 (4), 9−42.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A., Taris, T., & Bezinovic, P. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the need for cognitive closure scale: Comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and the Netherlands. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 139−156.   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Meyers-Levy, J. (1989). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In. P. Caferrata & A. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising (pp. 219−260). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
47 Moskowitz, G. B. (1993). Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 132−142.   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185−200.   DOI
49 Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113−131.   DOI   ScienceOn
50 Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51 Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201−214.   DOI
52 Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumeropinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38−52.   DOI   ScienceOn
53 Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223−255.   DOI   ScienceOn
54 Houghton, D. C., & Grewal, R. (2000). Please, let's get an answer - any answer: Need for consumer cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 17(11), 911−934.   DOI
55 Huff, L. C., & Alden, D. L. (1998). An investigation of consumer response to sales promotions in developing markets: A three-country analysis. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(3), 47−56.
56 Kempf, D. A. S., & Palan, K. M. (2006). The effects of gen-der and argument strength on the processing of wordof- mouth communication. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 10(1), 1−18.
57 Klein, C. T. F., & Webster, D. M. (2000). Individual differences in argument scrutiny as motivated by need for cognitive closure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 119−129.   DOI
58 Kline, R. B. (2007). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
59 Korgaonkar, P., & Wolin, L. D. (2002). Web usage, advertising, and shopping: Relationship patterns. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(2), 191−204.   DOI   ScienceOn
60 Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2005). Marketing management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice- Hall.
61 Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1994). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263−283.
62 Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 448−468.   DOI
63 Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861−876.   DOI   ScienceOn
64 Kruglanski, A. W., Atash, M. N., De Grada, E., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Webster, D. M. (1997). Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the need for closure scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 1005−1016.   DOI   ScienceOn
65 Creamer, M. (2007). At last, the reviews are in: Wal-Mart wakes up to the power of the people. Advertising Age, 78(29), 1−27. Retrieved September 14, 2009, from http:// adage.com/article?article_id=119456
66 Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 335− 343.
67 Dennis, C., Harris, L., & Sandhu, B. (2002). From bricks to clicks: Understanding the e-consumer. Qualitative Marketing Research, 5(4), 281−290.   DOI   ScienceOn
68 Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
69 Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., Skorinko, J., & Tullis, T. (2011). Online viewing and aesthetic preferences of generation Y and the baby boom generation: Testing user Web site experience through eye tracking. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 121−158.   DOI   ScienceOn
70 Dillon, T., & Reif, H. (2004). Factors influencing consumers' e-commerce commodity purchases. Information Technology Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(2), 1−12.
71 Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word of-mouth) messages. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193−197.   DOI   ScienceOn
72 Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378−384.   DOI   ScienceOn
73 Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 768−775.   DOI   ScienceOn
74 Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2007). Designing novel review ranking systems: Predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic Commerce, USA, 303−309.
75 Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Yale, L. J. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 83−100.   DOI   ScienceOn
76 Global advertising: Consumers trust real friends and virtual strangers the most. (2009, July 7). Nielsen Company. Retrieved January 29, 2012, from http://blog.nielsen. com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers- trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/
77 Bagozzie, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74−94.   DOI
78 Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 3−14.   DOI
79 Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). e-WOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449−456.   DOI   ScienceOn
80 Gwinner, K. P., Gremler, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: The customer's perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101−114.
81 Bailey, A. A. (2005). Consumer awareness and use of product review websites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(1), 68−81.   DOI
82 Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99−112.   DOI   ScienceOn
83 Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived risk and its components: A model and empirical test. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(2), 184−190.   DOI   ScienceOn
84 Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31−40.   DOI   ScienceOn
85 Block, J., & Block, J. (1951). An investigation of the relationship between intolerance of ambiguity and ethnocentrism, Journal of Personality, 19(3), 303−311.
86 Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics' reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24(3), 185−197.   DOI   ScienceOn
87 Bradac, J. J. (2001). Theory comparison: Uncertainty reduction, problematic integration, uncertainty management, and other curious constructs. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 456−476.   DOI
88 Brumfield, E. J. (2008). Using online tutorials to reduce uncertainty in information seeking behavior. Journal of Library Administration, 48(3-4), 365−377.   DOI   ScienceOn
89 Case, C. J., & King, D. L. (2003). Quantifying student internet purchasing behavior. In A. Alkafaj & J. Bivermen (Eds.), Business research yearbook, 10 (pp. 88−92). Sa-line, MI: Mcmaughton & Gunn.
90 Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? In M. C. Gilly & J. Myers-Levy (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 129−134). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
91 Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Wordof- mouth as a new element of making communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477−491.   DOI   ScienceOn
92 Choi, J. A., Koo, M., Choi, I., & Auh, S. (2008). Need for cognitive closure and information search strategy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(11), 1027−1042.   DOI   ScienceOn
93 Clare, C. (2010). Receiver perspectives of the determinants that influence eWOM adoption: An exploratory study. MMU Research, Research Institute for Business and Management. Retrieved March 10, 2010, from http:// www.ribm.mmu.ac.uk/symposium2010/fullpapers/Clare,% 20Carl.pdf
94 Cole, C., Laurent, G., Drolet, A., Ebert, J., Gutchess, A., Lambert-Pandraud, R., Mullet, E., Norton, M., & Peters, E. (2008). Decision making and brand choice by older consumers. Marketing Letters, 19(3-4), 355−365.   DOI