Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.6.997

Consumer Perception of Social Presence in E-tail Websites  

Park, Jee-Sun (Dept. of Retail, Hospitality, & Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee)
Fairhurst, Ann (Dept. of Retail, Hospitality, & Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.34, no.6, 2010 , pp. 997-1007 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examines the role of consumer perception of social presence in e-tailing websites. The study proposes that the perception of social presence influences the variables that are important for e-tailers to build a relationship with consumers, which are the attitudes of consumers toward an e-tailer and patronage intentions toward the e-tailer. This study hypothesizes that the attitudes of consumers are influenced by individual perceptions of social presence that guide their patronage intentions. Consumer trust and their affective states are hypothesized to serve as mediators in the relationship between consumer perception of social presence and the attitudes toward an e-tailer. Sixty-one female students were used to test the proposed model. The findings from regression and mediation analyses supported all hypotheses, suggesting that the perception of social presence plays a significant role in consumer shopping habits for apparel: consumer perception of social presence influences consumer trust and affective states that modify attitudes toward an e-tailer and consumer patronage intentions. The theoretical and managerial implications for apparel e-tailers are discussed.
Keywords
Social presence; Trust; Affective state; Attitude; Patronage intentions;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: Sociological Association.
2 Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales: 4th Quarter 2009. (2009). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/retail/mrts/www/data/pdf/0904.pdf
3 Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborgs dilemma: Progress embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrived May 18, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vo13/issue2/biocca2.html
4 Short, J., & Williams, E. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
5 Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(3), 325-343.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 73-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Straub, D., & Karahanna, E. (1998). Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization Science, 9(2), 160-175.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Keng, C.-J., & Lin, H.-Y. (2006). Impact of telepresence levels on internet advertising effects. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 9(1), 82-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-Ioyalty. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113.
13 Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science. 3(4), 475-500.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Reeves, R, & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: CSLI Publications.
15 Nass, C., Moon, Y.,& Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864-876.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44.
17 Pan, Y., & Zinkhan, G M. (2006). Determinants of retail patronage: A meta-analytical perspective. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 229-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19 Moorman, C, Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2007). Role of electronic trust in online retailing. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9/10), 1173-1202.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2009). Adoption of sensory enabling technology for online apparel shopping. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1101-1120.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data anlaysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
23 Korgaonkar, P. K., Lund, D., & Price, B. (1985). A structural equations approach toward examination of store attitude and store patronage behavior. Journal of Retailing, 61(2), 39-60.
24 Laaksonen, M. (1993). Retail patronage dynamics: Learning about daily shopping behavior in contexts of changing retail structures. Journal of Business Research, 28(112), 3-174.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.   DOI
26 Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.   DOI
27 Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2005-6). The impact of infusing social presence in the Web interface: An investigation across product types. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 31-55.
28 Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., & Neumann, M. M. (2006). The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 19-36.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Jeong, M., & Lambert, C. U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers' behavioral intentions to use lodging Web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(2), 129-146.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2003). Managing user trust in B2C e-services, e-Service Journal, 2(2), 7-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Grewal, D., Baker, J., Levy, M., & Voss, G B. (2003). The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail stores. Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 259-268.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Donovan, R. J.,& Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 35-57.
33 Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-398.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: HBJ.
35 Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Freeman, L. (2000). Keeping 'em happy. Marketing News, 34(10), 21.
38 Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison process. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100-118.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Cowles, D., & Crosby, L. A. (1990). Consumer acceptance of interactive media in service marketing encounters. Service Industries Journal, 10(3), 521-540.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in Web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Day, G S. (1969). A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 29-35.
43 Barlow, A. K. J., Siddiqui, N. Q., & Mannion, M. (2004). Developments in information and communication technologies for retail marketing channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(3), 157-163.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Baron, R., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.   DOI
45 Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007). Can a retail Web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 143-157.   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer,P. U.(1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184-206.   DOI   ScienceOn