1 |
Schutz, H. G., & Rucker, M. H. (1975). A comparison of variable configurations across scale lengths: An empirical study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 319-324.
DOI
|
2 |
Jenkins, G, & Taber, T. (1977). A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 392-398.
DOI
|
3 |
Friedman, H. H., Wilamowsky, Y., & Friedman, L. W. (1981). A comparison of balanced and unbalanced rating scales. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 19(2), 1-7.
|
4 |
Remmers, H. H., & Ewart, E. (1941). Reliability of multiple choice measuring instruments as a function of the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32, 61-66.
DOI
|
5 |
Chang, L. (1994). A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point liken-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(3), 205-215.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Lozano, L. M., Garcia-Cueto, E., & Muniz, J. (2008). Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4(2), 73-79.
DOI
|
7 |
Mckelvie, S. J. (1978). Graphic rating scales: How many categories? British Journal of Psychology, 69, 185-202.
DOI
|
8 |
Clarke, III. I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 15(1), 137-152.
|
9 |
Converse, J., & Presser, S. (1986). Survey questions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
|
10 |
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. R. (1970). Rating scales and information recovery: How many scales and response categories to use? Journal of Marketing, 34, 33-39.
|
11 |
Chae, S. (2005). Social research method and analysis (3rd ed.). Seoul: B&M Books.
|
12 |
Cox, E. P. III. (1980). The optimal number of response alternatives for a scales: A review. Journal of Marketing Rsearch, 17, 407-422
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point, and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61-77.
DOI
|
14 |
Brown, G, Wilding, R. E. II., & Coulter, R. L. (1991). Customer evaluation of retail salespeople using the SOCO scale: A replication, extension, and application. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 9, 347-351.
|
15 |
Son, Y., & Chae, S. (2008). Systematic questionnaire design (2nd ed.). Seoul: B&M Books.
|
16 |
Chen, C., Lee, S., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170-175.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Andrews, F.M. (1984). Construct validity and error components of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 409-442.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Bae, J. (2002). An analysis of the validity and reliability about the utility of the neutral point response category on a likert scale. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
|
19 |
Boote, A. S. (1981). Reliability testing of psychographic scales: Five-point or seven-point? Anchored or labeled? Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 53-60.
|
20 |
Alwin, D. F. (1997). Feeling thermometers versus 7-point scales: Which are better? Sociological Methods & Research, 25(3), 318-340.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Stone, M. H. (2004). Substantive scale construction. In E. V. Smith Jr. & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to rasch measurement (pp. 201-225). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
|
22 |
Wildt, A. R., & Mazis, M. B. (1978). Determinants of scale response: Label versus position. Journal of Marketing Research. 15, 261-267.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Saris, W. E. (1988). Variation in response functions: A source of measurement error in attitude research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
|
24 |
Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2(4), 343-364.
DOI
|
25 |
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1-15.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Ramsay, J. O. (1973). The effect of number of categories in rating scales on precision of estimation of scale values. Psychometrika, 38, 513-533.
DOI
|
27 |
Kulas, J. T., Stachowski, A. A., & Haynes, B. A. (2008). Middle response functioning in likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 251-259.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506-509.
DOI
|
29 |
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
30 |
Peabody, D. (1962). Two components in bipolar scales: Direction and extremeness. Psychological Review. 69, 65-73.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Lissitz, R. W., & Green, S. B. (1975). Effect of the number of scale points on reliability: A Monte Carlo approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 10-13.
DOI
|
32 |
Loken, B., Pirie, P., Virnig, K. A., Hinkle, R. L., & Salmon, C. T. (1987). The use of 0-10 scales in telephone surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29(3), 353-362.
|
33 |
Komorita, S. S. (1963). Attitude content, intensity, and the neutral point on a likert scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 61(December), 327-334.
DOI
|
34 |
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for likert scales items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657-674.
DOI
|
35 |
Kim, N. (2001). A comparative analysis of items election methods for developing the likert scale. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul.
|
36 |
Kim, S., & Rhee, E. (2004). Development of measurement scale for clothing shopping orientation (Part I). Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 28(9/10), 1253-1264.
과학기술학회마을
|
37 |
Hofacker, C. F. (1984). Categorical judgment scaling with ordinal assumptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 91-106.
DOI
|
38 |
Komorita, S. S., & Graham, W. K. (1965). Number of scale points and the reliability of scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 987-995.
DOI
|
39 |
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
40 |
Hancock, G. R., & Klockars, A. J. (1991). The effect of scale manipulations on validity: Targeting frequency rating scales for anticipated performance levels. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 147-154.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. S. (1971). Three-point scales always good enough. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 495-500.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Finn, R. H. (1972). Effects of some variations in rating scale characteristics on the means and reliabilities of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 255-265.
DOI
|
43 |
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletine, 2, 66-70.
|
44 |
Garner, W. R. (1960). Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. The Psychological Review, 67, 342-352.
|