Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.4.542

The Effects of Organizational Culture in the Textile Companies on Innovation Capacity and Business Performance - Focusing on Moderating Effects of Company Size -  

Yoh, Eun-Ah (Dept. of Fashion Marketing, Keimyung University)
Park, Kwang-Hee (Dept. of Fashion Marketing, Keimyung University)
Kim, Mun-Young (Dept. of Fashion Marketing, Keimyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.32, no.4, 2008 , pp. 542-552 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to investigate the effects of organizational culture of textile companies on innovation capacity and business performance and to confirm the moderating effect of company size on these relationships. Survey data collected from 147 practitioners in the textile companies were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-tests, and multiple causal modeling using AMOS 6.0. In the model test result, all the hypothesized paths were significant in spite of low goodness of fit. Also, although difference was found in company innovativeness, no difference was indicated in innovation capacity and business performance according to company size. In addition, the smaller companies, the stronger effect of company innovativeness on innovation capacity that affected business performance. On the contrary, the larger companies, the stronger effect of participative decision making on innovation capacity that did not affect business performance. Study results may provide useful implications for practitioners who are interested in developing organizational culture appropriate for company size.
Keywords
Textile company; Company size; Organizational culture; Innovation capacity; Business performance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 윤영진. (1999). 기업성과에 대한 혁신성이 영향과 성과척도간의 관계에 관한 연구. 서강대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
2 이지우. (2002). 중소기업의 혁신성에 관한 탐색적 연구. 중소기업연구, 24(2), 187-210
3 Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Strategy Science Quarterly, 35(3), 128-152   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Frans, J. H. M. V. & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 134-154   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Romano, C. A. (1990). Identifying factors which influence product innovation: A case study approach. Journal of Management Studies, 27(1), 75-95   DOI
6 Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (1995) Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(7), 63-74
7 Stoneman, P. (1992). Why innovate? In A. Brown., & M. Ricketts (Eds.), Stimulating innovation in industry (pp. 58-79). New York: Kogan Page Limited
8 Verhees, Fr. H. M. & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation and performance in small forms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 134-154   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Olson, E. M., Waker, Jr., O. C., & Reukert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-63   DOI   ScienceOn
10 이규억. (2000). 경제 진화와 한국 기업의 선택. 서울: 삼성경제연구소
11 Dyer, Jr., W. G. & Handler, W. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 71-84   DOI
12 박광희, 김정원, 유화숙. (2003). 섬유.패션산업. 서울: 교학연구사
13 혁신 피로증? (2007, 8. 3). 동아일보, p. B3
14 Carson, D. S., Cromie, P., McGowan, P., & Hill, J. (1995). Marketing and entrepreneurship in SMEs: An innovative approach. London, UK: Prentice Hall
15 Sagie, A. (1994). Participative decision making and performance: A moderator analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(2), 227-246   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6(4), 327-347   DOI
17 김계수. (2007). AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석. 서울: 한나래
18 Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publishing
19 Hausman, A. (2005). Innovativeness among small business: Theory and propositions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 773-782   DOI   ScienceOn
20 김은환, 진현, 예지은, 이상우. (2007, 5. 9). 좋은 기업문화 만들기. CEO Information, 603, 1-21
21 Lawler, E. E. (1991). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
22 홍장표. (2005). 기술협력이 지역 중소기업의 혁신성과에 미치는 영향. 중소기업연구, 27(3), 3-32
23 Damanpour, F. (1991) Organizational innovation: A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Timmons, J. (1994). New venture creation (4th ed.). Burr Ridge, III: Irvin
25 곽수일, 장영일. (1998). 중소기업의 기술네트워킹과 혁신성과에 관한 실증연구. 중소기업연구, 12, 51-71
26 Daily, C. M. & Thomson, S. S. (1994). Ownership structure, strategic posture, and firm growth: An empirical examination. Family Business Review, 7(3), 237-247   DOI
27 Black, J. S. & Gregersen, H. B. (1997). Participative decision-making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 50, 859-878
28 Sivades, E. & Dwyer, R. F. (2000). An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-43   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Denhardt, R. B. (1993). Theories of public organizations (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
30 Dos Santos, B. L. & Pfeffer, K. (1995). Rewards to investors in innovative information technology applications: First movers and early followers in ATMS. Organizational Science, 6(3), 241-259   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
32 Dalton, D. R., Drckhardt, D. M., & Porter, L. W. (1981). Functional turnover: An empirical assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(6), 716-721   DOI
33 Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429-438   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Clark, P. (1989). Innovation in technology and organization. London: Neil Stannton
35 Robbins, D. K., Pantuosco, L. J., Parker, D. F., & Fuller, B. K. (2000). An empirical assessment of the contribution of small business employment to U.S. State economic performance. Small Business Economics, 15(4), 293-302   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Van de Ven, A. H. (1986) Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Burt, R., Gabbay, S. M., Holt, G., & Moran, P. (1994). Contingent organization as a network theory: The cultureperformance contingent function. Acta Sociology, 37(4), 345-370   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Glew, D. J., O'Leary-Kelly, A. N., Griffin, R. W., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1995). Participation in organizations: A preview of the issues and proposed framework for future analysis. Journal of Management, 21, 395-421   DOI
39 Hurley, R. F. & Hult, T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(7), 42-54   DOI   ScienceOn
40 임종원, 김기찬. (1989). 신제품 개발의 성패요인 분석. 중소기업연구, 11(2), 1-23
41 홍순복, 정기호, 황종호. (2005). 참여의사결정과 대인신뢰가 생산성에 미치는 영향. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 5(6), 264-272   과학기술학회마을
42 Cohen, W. M. & Klepper, S. (1992). The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 1-14
43 Freel, M. S. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60-80
44 Day, G. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(10), 37-52   DOI   ScienceOn