1 |
rthur, L. B. (1999). Dress and the social construction of gender in two sororities. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 17(2), 84-93
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Belk, R., Mayer, R., & Bahn, K. (1981). The eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceptions of consumption symbolism. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 523-530
|
3 |
Davis, L. L. (1984). Judgment ambiguity, self-consciousness, and conformity in judgments of fashionability. Psychological Reports, 54, 671-675
DOI
|
4 |
Kwon, Y. H. (1994). Feeling toward one's clothing and selfperception of emotion, sociability, and work competency. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 129-139
|
5 |
O'Cass, A. (2004). Fashion clothing consumption: Antecedents and consequences of fashion clothing involvement. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 869-882
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Richins, M. L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 522-533
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Thornton, B. & Thornton, D. (1999). Ready for rush: The must have manual for sorority rushees. Nashville, TN: Hamblett House Inc.
|
8 |
National Panhellenic Conference. (2005) Manual of information (14th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: National Panehellenic Conference
|
9 |
Richins, M. L. & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
McLean, K. (2003). The official sorority handbook. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Corporation
|
11 |
Kong, M.-H. (2003). Material girls: Sexual perceptions of Korean teenage girls who have experienced compensated dates. Asian Center for Women's Studies, 9(2), 67-94
DOI
|
12 |
Workman, J. E. & Johnson, K. K. P. (1993). Fashion opinion leadership, fashion innovativeness, and need for variety. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(3), 60-64
DOI
|
13 |
Sontag, M. S., Peteu, M., & Lee, J. (1997). Clothing in the self-system of adolescents: Relationships among values, proximity of clothing to self, clothing interest, anticipated outcomes and perceived quality of life (Michigan State University Research Report 556). East Lansing, MI: Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station
|
14 |
Johnson, K., Schofield, N. A., & Yurchisin, J. (2002). Appearance Appearance and dress as a source of information: A qualitative approach to data collection. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 20(3), 125-137
DOI
|
15 |
Auty, S. & Elliott, R. (1998). Fashion involvement, selfmonitoring and the meaning of brands. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(2), 109-123
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Hunt, J. M., Kernan, J. B., & Mitchell, D. J. (1996). Materialism as social cognition: People, possessions, and perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(1), 65-83
DOI
|
17 |
Sontag, M. S., & Lee, J. (2004). Proximity of clothing to self scale. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 22(4), 161-177
DOI
|
18 |
Jung, J. & Lee, S.-H. (2006). Cross-cultural comparisons of appearance self-schema, body image, self-esteem, and dieting behavior between Korean and U.S. women. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 34(4), 350-365
DOI
|