Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.7.1064

Purchasing Behavior and Product Evaluation Criteria of Knitted Apparel Consumers  

Park, Na-Ri (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Kim, Myoung-Ok (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Moon, Young-Ok (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Seo, Mun-Suk (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Seo, Min-Jeong (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Lee, Kyu-Hye (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.31, no.7, 2007 , pp. 1064-1074 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the purchasing behavior of knitted apparel consumers. Differences in knit product evaluation criteria according to consumer characteristics, such as gender, age, and interest in knit products also were reported. Male and female consumers participated in the study. Quota sampling was used and data from 463 questionnaires were analyzed. Descriptive statistics, $X^2$ analysis, factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and post-hoc test were conducted. Results indicated that 65.4 percent of respondents did not discern between knits and woven products. Cardigan was the most preferred knitted product category. Most of the respondents purchased knitted apparel themselves, got product information at stores, spent less than 100,000 won for a single knitted product and went to department stores to buy knitted apparel products. Some 62.5 percent of respondents reported wearing the product less than four year. Consumers who are more interest in knitted apparel also considered such criteria as external attributes, quality, and aesthetics to be important. Respondents who discerned between knits and woven considered quality most important. Female respondents considered quality and aesthetic criteria more important; respondents in their twenties considered aesthetic criteria most important; and respondents in their thirties through fifties considered external criteria most important. Results of this study provide a basis for understanding knitted apparel consumers' purchasing behavior.
Keywords
Knitted apparel; Purchasing behavior; Evaluation criteria; Consumer characteristics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김은영. (1998). 소비자 의류제품지식과 의복 구매 시 평가기준과의 관계. 한국의류학회지, 22(3), 353-364
2 어패럴뉴스사. (2005). 2005/2006 한국패션 브랜드 연감 서울: 어패럴뉴스사
3 한국의류산업협회. (2005). 니트의류산업 경쟁력조사. 과천: 무역위원회
4 Dickson, M. A. & Littrell, M. A. (1997). Consumers of clothing from alternative attitudes and purchase evaluative criteria. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(1), 20-33   DOI
5 The United Nations. (2005, August 23). International standard industrial classification of all economic activities, revision 4, (ISIC Rev. 4). The United Nations. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcs.asp?C1=27&Lg=1&Co=14
6 Huddleston, P., Cassill, N. L., & Hamilton, L. K. (1993). Apparel selection criteria as predictors of brand orientation. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 51-56   DOI
7 김민수, 김문숙. (2003). 의류제품에 대한 소비자의 품질평가기준. 복식문화연구. 11(1), 47-65
8 이옥회, 김경희, 최미현. (2002). 쇼핑성향에 따른 니트웨어 구매행동에 관한 연구. 복식문화연구, 10(4), 364-376
9 최진희, 한진이. (2005). 중년 여성용 니트재킷의 생산실태 및 만족도에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 29(8). 1068-1078   과학기술학회마을
10 Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2006). Principles of marketing (11th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education
11 최종명. (2005). 셔츠의 착용실태와 소재에 대한 주관적 선호 감각. 대한가정학회지, 43(1), 167-176   과학기술학회마을
12 김경회, 이순홍. (1994). 니트웨어 소비자 성향 실태 및 업체에 관한 조사 연구. 복식, 23, 131-150
13 Eckert, C. M., Cross, N., & Johnson, J. H. (2000). Intelligent support for commnication in design teams: Garment shape specifications in the knitwear industry. Design Studies, 21(1), 99-112   DOI   ScienceOn
14 안광호, 황선진, 정찬진. (2005). 패션마케팅 서울: 수학사
15 이옥회, 김경희 (2003). 혜택세분화에 따른 20대 여성의 니트웨어 구매행동에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 27(6), 601-611
16 류경옥. (2002). 니트웨어 품질개선을 위한 니트웨어 착용 경험자의 만족.불만족 연구: 질적 연구를 통하여. 복식문화연구. 10(3), 24-25
17 김성련. (2000). 피복재료학. 서울: 교문사
18 Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kado1ph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process: Consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22   DOI
19 Lam, S. Y. & Mukherjee, A. (2005). The effects of merchandise coordination and juxtaposition on consumers product evaluation and purchase intention in store-based retailing. Journal of Retailing, 81(3), 231-250   DOI   ScienceOn
20 김미영, 이은영. (1991). 의복 평가기준의 이론적 틀에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지. 15(3), 321-334
21 임지영. (2006). 연령대에 따른 여성의 청바지 착용실태 조사. 한국의류학회지, 8(4), 413-419
22 Long-Tolbert, S., Till, B. D., & Swaminathan, S. (2006). Product attribute evaluations: Role of consumer experience and halo effect. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 678-679
23 한성지. (2000). 티트산업 활성화를 위한 구매자의 의사결정 특성 연구. 서울여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
24 고애란. (1994). 국내 및 외국 상표 청바지의 구매의도에 따른 평가기준에 대한 신념과 추구이미지 및 의복태도의 차이연구. 한국의류학회지, 18(2), 263-272
25 홍병숙, 이은진, 김계연. (2002). 20-30대 여성의 니트웨어 구매행동 분석. 한국의류학회지, 26(7), 1055-1065
26 Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36   DOI   ScienceOn
27 이지연, 박재옥. (2006) 소비자의 객관적 지식, 주관적 지식과 관여가 의류상품 속성평가에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 30(5), 818-828   과학기술학회마을