Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.4.519

An Exploratory Study on the Brand Architecture and the In-house Brand Differentiation Strategy of Korean Apparel Enterprises  

Kim, Sae-Hee (Dept. of Fashion Design, Busan Kyungsang College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.31, no.4, 2007 , pp. 519-530 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is an exploratory research on the brand architecture of Korean apparel enterprises and the differentiation strategy among in-house competing brands. For data analysis, secondary data was used. 20 apparel enterprises were used as the subjects. The results are as following. First, as a result of brand architecture composition, apparel enterprises used the strategy that initially paved the way launching several brands in a specific item category and after that diversified to other categories. Most enterprises used the multi-brand strategy operating plural brands in a same zoning. The terms for launching succeeding brands were about $1{\sim}5$ years. Second, as a result of analysing the cases which several brands competes within a same zoning, all the posterior brands had some differences from the prior ones. The most frequent differentiation factor was price. Concept, target age, and distribution channel followed. The order of the factors was somewhat different among the item categories. The differentiation strategy among in-house competing brands meant that the enterprises manage plural brands in a same zoning for the growth of whole market share instead of the direct competition among in-house brands. The results of this study can suggest a growth direction to the enterprises planning to launch new brands.
Keywords
Brand architecture; Multi-brand strategy; In-house competition; Differentiation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 국내 패션 유통 브랜드 1944개. (2004, 4. 26). 어패럴뉴스. 자료검색일 2006, 3. 20, 자료출처 http://www.apparelnews.co.kr
2 이상규. (2002). 전략적 브랜드 포트폴리오 구축. LG주간경제, 207, 37-41
3 정창환. (1999). 브랜드 다각화 전략의 성공 결정 요인. 충북대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
4 Low, G. S. & Fullerton, R. A. (1994). Brands, brand management, and the brand manager system: A critical historical evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 173-190   DOI   ScienceOn
5 안광호, 황선진, 정창진. (l999b) 패션마케팅. 서울: 수학사
6 Solomon, M. R. & Stuart, E. W. (1997). Marketing: Real people, real choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
7 Jain, S. C. (1996). Marketing planning and strategy (5th ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing
8 Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall
9 정상길. (2002). 새로운 패션 머천다이징. 서울: 섬유저널 Fashionbiz
10 Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (1996). Principles of marketing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Inc.
11 이은영. (1999). 패션마케팅. 서울:교문사
12 국내 패션 관련 브랜드 1800여개. (2005, 4. 18). 어패럴슈스. 자료검색일 2006, 3. 20, 자료출처 http://www.apparelnews.co.kr
13 안광호, 한상만, 전성률 (1999a). 전략적 브랜드 관리. 서울:학현사
14 Kapferer, J. N. (1992). Strategic brand management: New approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity (1st ed.). London: Kogan Page Limited
15 어패럴뉴스사. (2005). 2005/2006 한국패션브랜드연감. 서울:어패럴뉴스사 출판부
16 Keegan, W. J. & Moriety, S. E. (1995). Marketing. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
17 Schnaars, S. P. (1998). Marketing strategy. 2nd and revised Ed. New York: The Free Press