Browse > Article

Validity of the Conceptual Structure of Clothing Shopping Orientation -Focused on the Specific Structure by the Gender-  

Kim Saehee (Dept. of Fashion Design, Busan Kyungsang College)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles / v.29, no.3_4, 2005 , pp. 535-546 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study are to verify the validity of the conceptual structure of clothing shopping orientation(CSO) developed in the previous research, and to explore the difference of CSO structure between male and female consumer groups. For those purposes, data of 499 male and female consumers were collected. Confirmatory factor analysis, ANOVA, and simultaneous factor analysis were used for data analysis. The results are as follows. First, as a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the validity of conceptual structure of CSO was verified. Second, as a result of ANOVA, male and female showed significantly different CSO at the lower-dimensions level, and as a result of simultaneous factor analysis, male and female showed significantly different relationships between dimensions within the structure. This means that the CSOs of both male and female can be explained by the same CSO structure model, but the specific relationships between CSO dimensions are different by the gender of consumers. Finally, directions for fashion marketing mix concerning the CSO structures of male and female were suggested.
Keywords
Clothing shopping orientation; Conceptual structure; Validity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김세희, 이은영 (2004c) 의복 쇼핑 성향의 측정 도구 개발 (제1보). 한국의류학회지. 28(9/10) , 1253-1264
2 안민영. (1999). 사이버 쇼핑 이용자의 의류 쇼핑 성향에 따른 패션 제품 및 가상 점포 평가 기준에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
3 채윤희. (2002). N세대 인터넷 쇼핑몰 패션제품 소비자의 쇼팽성향과 정보원 활용에 관한 연구- 서울 경기 지역을 중심으로-. 동덕여자대학교 패션전문대학원 석사학위 논문
4 Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applica-tions, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
5 Yoh, E. (2001). Gender differences of mail-catalog shoppers in shopper tendencies, patronage motive strength, and patronage behaviors. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles. 25(9), 1551-1562
6 Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J. & Coney, K. A. (2001). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy(8th ed). Boston, Mass.: Irwin/McGraw Hill
7 Bruner, G C. II. (1988). Singles and sex-roles: Are there differences in the clothing prepurchase process? Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(1),3-9   DOI
8 김세희, 이은영. (2004b). 의복 쇼핑 성향의 개념적 구조 규명. 한국의류학회지, 28(6) , 830-841
9 박민정. (2001). 남녀 대학생의 의복가격지각과 의복쇼핑성향 및 의복구매행동에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학 원석사학위 논문
10 김세희, 이은영. (2004a). 의복 쇼핑 성향의 개념 규명을 위한 문헌적 연구. 한국의류학회지, 28(3/4),472-482
11 하오선, 신혜원 (2001). 인터넷 의류구매자의 의류쇼핑행동, 태도 및 특성. 한국의류학회지, 25(1), 71-82
12 프라임 영한사전. (2000). 서울: 두산동아
13 Lomax, R. G (1983). A guide to multiple-sample structural equation modeling. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 15(6), 580-584   DOI
14 노형진 (2002). SPSS/Amos 에 의한 사회조사분석 - 범주형 데이터 분석 및 공분산구조분석-. 서울.형설출판사
15 문정미.(2003) 청소년의 구매영향력과 의복소비행동에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
16 고전미.(2001). 인터넷 친숙도에 따른 패션제품 구매행동에 관한 연구 - 20-30대 남녀를 중심으로-.이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문