Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14478/ace.2022.1002

A Numerical Study of Cathode Block and Air Flow Rate Effect on PEMFC Performance  

Jo, Seonghun (School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan)
Kim, Junbom (School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan)
Publication Information
Applied Chemistry for Engineering / v.33, no.1, 2022 , pp. 96-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
Reactants of PEMFC are hydrogen and oxygen in gas phases and fuel cell overpotential could be reduced when reactants are smoothly transported. Numerous studies to modify cathode flow field design have been conducted because oxygen mass transfer in high current density region is dominant voltage loss factor. Among those cathode flow field designs, a block in flow field is used to forced supply reactant gas to porous gas diffusion layer. In this study, the block was installed on a simple fuel cell model. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), effects of forced convection due to blocks on a polarization curve and local current density contour were studied when different air flow rates were supplied. The high current density could be achieved even with low air supply rate due to forced convection to a gas diffusion layer and also with multiple blocks in series compared to a single block due to an increase of forced convection effect.
Keywords
PEMFC; Numerical analysis; Block; Forced convection; Flow field design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. Marappan, K. Palaniswamy, T. Velumani, B. C. Kim, R. Velayutham, P. Shivakumar, and S. Sundaram, Performance studies of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with different flow field designs - review, Chem. Rec., 21, 663-714 (2021).   DOI
2 A. Aiyejina and M. K. S. Sastry, PEMFC flow channel geometry optimization: A review, J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol., 9, 011011 (2012).   DOI
3 A. Mughal and X. Li, Experimental diagnostics of PEM fuel cells, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 63, 277 (2006).
4 X. Li, I. Sabir, and J. Park, A flow channel design procedure for PEM fuel cells with effective water removal, J. Power Sources, 163, 933-942 (2007).   DOI
5 X. D. Wang, G. Lu, Y. Y. Duan, and D. J. Lee, Numerical analysis on performances of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with various cathode flow channel geometries, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37, 15778-15786 (2012).   DOI
6 X. D. Wang, Y. Y. Duan, W. M. Yan, and X. F. Peng, Effects of flow channel geometry on cell performance for PEM fuel cells with parallel and interdigitated flow fields, Electrochim. Acta, 53, 5334-5343 (2008).   DOI
7 R. O'Hayre, S. W. Cha, W. Colella, and F. B. Prinz, Fuel Cell Fundamentals, 3rd ed., 275-277, Wiley, NJ, USA (2016).
8 P. C. Okonkwo and C. Otor, A review of gas diffusion layer properties and water management in proton exchange membrane fuel cell system, Int. J. Energy Res., 45, 3780-3800 (2021).   DOI
9 S. Flick, M. Schwager, E. McCarthy, and W. Merida, Designed experiments to characterize PEMFC material properties and performance, Appl. Energy, 129, 135-146 (2014).   DOI
10 N. Zamel and X. Li, Effective transport properties for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells - With a focus on the gas diffusion layer, Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci., 39, 111-146 (2013).   DOI
11 H. Li, Y. Tang, Z. Wang, Z. Shi, S. Wu, D. song, J. Zhang, K. Fatih, J. Zhang, H. Wang, Z. Liu, R. Abouatallah, and A. Mazza, A review of water flooding issues in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell, J. Power Sources, 178, 103-117 (2008).   DOI
12 J. St-Pierre, D. P. Wilkinson, S. Knights, and M. L. Bos, Relationship between water management, contamination and lifetime degradation in PEFC, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst., 3, 99-106 (2000).
13 P. J. Hamilton and B. G. Pollet, Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) flow field plate: Design, materials and characterization, Fuel Cells, 10, 489-509 (2010).   DOI
14 L. Yu, G. Ren, M. Qin, and X. Jiang, Transport mechanisms and performance simulations of a PEM fuel cell with interdigitated flow field, Renew. Energy, 34, 530-543 (2009).   DOI
15 J. H. Jang, W. M. Yan, H. Y. Li, and Y. C. Chou, Humidity of reactant fuel on the cell performance of PEM fuel cell with baffle-blocked flow field designs, J. Power Sources, 159, 468-477 (2006).   DOI
16 P. M. Wilde, M. Mandle, M. Murata, and N. Berg, Structural and physical properties of GDL and GDL/BPP combinations and their influence on PEMFC performance, Fuel Cells, 4 (2004).
17 S. Barati, B. Khoshandam, and M. M. Ghazi, An investigation of channel blockage effects on hydrogen mass transfer in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with various geometries and optimization by response surface methodology, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 21928-21939 (2018).   DOI
18 X. G. Yang, N. Burke, C. Y. Wang, K. Tajiri, and K. Shinohara, Simultaneous measurements of species and current distribution in a PEFC under low-humidity operation, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, 759-766 (2005).
19 H. W. Wu and H. W. Ku, The optimal parameters estimation for rectangular cylinders installed transversely in the flow channel in PEMFC from a three-dimensional PEMFC model and the Taguchi method, Appl. Energy, 88, 4879-4890 (2011).   DOI