Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.23047/korea-sire.2022.2.1.003

Visual design teacher competency evaluation model study  

SUN, PENG (Dong-Eui University)
Publication Information
Journal of the International Relations & Interdisciplinary Education / v.2, no.1, 2022 , pp. 29-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
In recent years, visual design has become an emerging industry that creates production value in various countries, and visual design teachers have become a key factor affecting the development of designers and even the trend of the design industry. Therefore, the requirements for the ability of visual design teachers have become particularly important. This study takes the visual communication teachers in colleges and universities as the research object. Focus on the composition of competencies that teachers have when performing their duties. First of all, through document sorting, it is based on the five aspects of knowledge ability, teaching ability, practical ability, management ability and professional ethics. A Likert scale questionnaire was developed on the evaluation of visual design teachers' competencies by interviewing 10 visual design industry experts and conducting two Delphi method interviews. This research refers to the relevant literatures such as curriculum research and teaching objective research of design major, and discusses the evaluation standards of visual design teachers' abilities in colleges and universities. Expert interviews have sorted out 12 criteria and 36 sub-criteria about visual design teachers' abilities, and verified their rationality through expert return visits. The establishment of this evaluation standard provides a certain theoretical basis for visual design teachers' ability evaluation and self-cognition.
Keywords
Visual Communication Teacher; Visual Communication Major; Teacher Evaluation; Ability Evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Barnett (1996). The limits of competence: Knowledge, higher educationand society. The society for research into higher education &open university press.
2 McClelland, D.C. (1975). Power: The Inner Experience. New York: Irvington Publishers. Halstead Press. Natinal commission on Teaching and Americans Fuyure,What mattes most,New York,N.Y.1996.
3 China Academy of Engineering (2018). 2019 Chinastrategic emerging industry development report. 23-36.
4 Robinson, David Z.(2001), Testing Teacher Candidates: The Role of Licensure Tests in Improving Teacher Quality, National Academy Press.
5 Ren Wangbing, Xia Nong (2013). Development strategy of China's creative industry. China Planning Press, 3-35.
6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_communication (2022.04.20)
7 경노훈, 윤민희 (1999). 디자인 문화와 생활, 서울:예경, p.46-52.
8 강현주 (2010). 한국의 디자인전문교육 오늘과 내일. 전주대학교 디자인교육 심포지엄.
9 김경화 (2015). 디자인 학과에서 국가 직무 능력 표준(NCS)의 도입에 관한 연구. 한국디자인 트렌드학회, 한국포럼, 0(47), 143-152.
10 이수철, 윤민희 (1999). 현대디자인에 있어서 한국성 표현에 관한 연구. 디자인학 연구, 87-99.
11 이홍민, 김종인 (2003). 핵심역량, 핵심인 재. 서울: 한국능률협회.
12 이선미 (2006). 포트폴리오 평가도구를 활용한 디자인.공예교육에 관한 연구: 칠보공 예 교육을 중심으로. 국민대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문, 86-87.
13 루랑(卢朗), 웨이선(孙巍), (2006). 布尔学校的创立, http://www.dolcn.com.
14 丁海洋, 张庆文, 付建强 (2012). 基于培养创新型体育人才的实验教学评价体系研究. 南京体育学院学报(自然科学版), 11(3), pp.12-16.   DOI