Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.23095/ETI.2022.23.2.129

Interactive Video Player for Supporting Learner Engagement in Video-Based Online Learning  

YOON, Meehyun (Chungbuk National University)
ZHENG, Hua (Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science)
JO, Il-Hyun (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Educational Technology International / v.23, no.2, 2022 , pp. 129-155 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study sought to design and develop an interactive video player (IVP) capable of promoting student engagement through the use of online video content. We designed features built upon interactive, constructive, active, passive (ICAP), and crowd learning frameworks. In the development stage of this study, we integrated numerous interactive features into the IVP intended to help learners shift from passive to interactive learning activities. We then explored the effectiveness and usability of the developed IVP by conducting an experiment in which we evaluated students' exam scores after using either our IVP or a conventional video player. There were 158 college students who participated in the study; 76 students in the treatment group used the IVP and 82 students in the control group used a conventional video player. Results indicate that the participants in the experiment group demonstrated better achievement than the participants in the control group. We further discuss the implications of this study based on an additional survey that was administered to disclose how usable the participants perceived the IVP to be.
Keywords
Interactive video player; ICAP framework; Crowd learning; Video-based learning; Video engagement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Speily, O. R., & Kardan, A. A. (2018). Increasing information reposting behavior in online learning community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 100-110.
2 Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157-170. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048.   DOI
3 Surowiecki, J. (2005). Independent individuals and wise crowds. IT Conversations, 468. itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail468.html
4 Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823   DOI
5 Stull, A. T., Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2021). The case for embodied instruction: The instructor as a source of attentional and social cues in video lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1441.   DOI
6 Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003   DOI
7 Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and higher education, 10(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005   DOI
8 Mitrovic, A., Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Weerasinghe, A., & Mathews, M. (2017). Supporting constructive video-based learning: requirements elicitation from exploratory studies. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 224-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_19   DOI
9 Martin-Ramos, P., Lopes, M. J., da Silva, M. M. L., Gomes, P. E., da Silva, P. S. P., Domingues, J. P., & Silva, M. R. (2018). Reprint of 'First exposure to Arduino through peer-coaching: Impact on students' attitudes towards programming'. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.011   DOI
10 Mierowsky, R., Marcus, N., & Ayres, P. (2020). Using mimicking gestures to improve observational learning from instructional videos. Educational Psychology, 40(5), 550-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1650896   DOI
11 Vukovic M, Mariana L, & Laredo J. (2010). PeopleCloud for the globally integrated enterprise. In A. Dan, F. Gittler & F. Toumani (Eds.), Service-oriented computing (pp. 109-114). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16132-2_10   DOI
12 Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & management, 43(1), 15-27.   DOI
13 Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Random House.
14 Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43.   DOI
15 Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145-178.
16 Hampton, D., & Pearce, P. F. (2016). Student engagement in online nursing courses. Nurse educator, 41(6), 294-298. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000275   DOI
17 Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. (2013). Short videos improve student learning in online education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 253-259.
18 Hung, I. C., & Chen, N. S. (2018). Embodied interactive video lectures for improving learning comprehension and retention. Computers & Education, 117, 116-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.005   DOI
19 Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernandez-Garcia, A., Chaparro-Pelaez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students' academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713   DOI
20 Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., & Horton, J. (2013). The future of crowd work. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1301-1318.
21 Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050   DOI
22 Chou, S. W., & Liu, C. H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of computer assisted learning, 21(1), 65-76.   DOI
23 Angrave, L., Zhang, Z., Henricks, G., & Mahipal, C. (2020). Who benefits? Positive learner outcomes from behavioral analytics of online lecture video viewing using classtranscribe. Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1193-1199. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366953   DOI
24 Chatti, M. A., Marinov, M., Sabov, O., Laksono, R., Sofyan, Z., Yousef, A. M. F., & Schroeder, U. (2016). Video annotation and analytics in CourseMapper. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0035-1.   DOI
25 Chen, H. C., O'Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., Fogh, S., Kobashi, B., & Ten Cate, O. (2015). Sequencing learning experiences to engage different level learners in the workplace: An interview study with excellent clinical teachers. Medical teacher, 37(12), 1090-1097. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009431   DOI
26 Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092   DOI
27 Anderson, M., & Magruder, J. (2012). Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 957-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02512.x   DOI
28 Cho, M. H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students' self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69-75. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001.   DOI
29 Bandura, A. (2008). Observational learning. The international encyclopedia of communication
30 Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in cognitive science, 1(1), 73-105.   DOI
31 de Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students' motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218-231.   DOI
32 Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A.Y. (2011), "Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web", Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86-96.   DOI
33 Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2009). How the crowd can teach. In S. Hatzipanagos & S. Warburton (Eds.), Handbook of research on social software and developing community ontologies (pp. 1-17). IGI Global Information Science. www.igiglobal.com/downloads/excerpts/33011.pdf.
34 Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z   DOI
35 Eisenberg, M. & Fischer, G. (2014). MOOCs: A Perspective from the Learning Sciences. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee & L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and Becoming in Practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 1, pp. 190-197). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
36 Ashuri, T., Dvir-Gvisman, S., & Halperin, R. (2018). Watching me watching you: How observational learning affects self-disclosure on social network sites?. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 34-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx003   DOI
37 Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn't work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015   DOI
38 Gasevic, D., Joksimovic, S., Eagan, B. R., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019). SENS: Network analytics to combine social and cognitive perspectives of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 562-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.003   DOI
39 Giannakos, M. N., Sampson, D. G., & Kidzinski, L. (2016). Introduction to smart learning analytics: Foundations and developments in video-based learning. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40561-016-0034-2   DOI
40 Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239   DOI
41 Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2014). Social learning and cognition. Academic Press.
42 Clarke, T. (2013). The advance of the MOOCs (massive open online courses). Education+ Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911311326036   DOI
43 Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R. F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2017). Follow the successful crowd: Raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference, 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027411   DOI
44 Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266   DOI
45 Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2020). Analytics for student engagement. In M. Virvou, E. Alepis, G. Tsihrintzis & L. Jain (Eds.), Machine learning paradigms (Vol. 158, pp. 23-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3   DOI
46 Morgan, H. (2020). Best practices for implementing remote learning during a pandemic. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(3), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1751480   DOI
47 Nokelainen, P. (2005). The technical and pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material. EdMedia + Innovative Learning, 1011-1016.
48 Petrovcic, A., & Petric, G. (2014). Differences in intrapersonal and interactional empowerment between lurkers and posters in health-related online support communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.008   DOI
49 Sablic, M., Mirosavljevic, A., & Skugor, A. (2020). Video-based learning (VBL)-past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5   DOI
50 Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132   DOI
51 Martin-Monje, E., Castrillo, M. D., & Manana-Rodriguez, J. (2018). Understanding online interaction in language MOOCs through learning analytics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1378237   DOI
52 Kalisz, D. E. (2016). Crowd learning: Innovative harnessing the knowledge and potential of people. Innovative management education pedagogies for preparing next-generation leaders, 55-74. 10.4018/978-1-4666-9691-4.ch004   DOI