Browse > Article

A Reversal in Retirement Ages and the Future of Social Policy in the United States  

전광희 (충남대학교 사회학과)
Publication Information
Korea journal of population studies / v.26, no.1, 2003 , pp. 115-141 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to describe a long-term trend toward earlier retirement and its reversal since 1985 in the United States, together with changes in socioeconomic conditions and social-policy programs which have contributed to this new development. The American people's recent propensity to retire at relatively younger ages was mainly a result of secular increase in individual wealth that had made it possible for them to enjoy higher standard of living without their participation in labor market activities at older ages. In addition to the introduction of compulsory retirement system, both social security retirement pension program and corporate pension system have also contributed significantly to the declining retirement age and its reversal around the mid-1980s. This paper pays full attention to the set of social policy programs which are currently being used to sustain the recent reversal in ages at retirement. The basic question to be raised here, however, is about whether or not the U. S. government will ave to continue to implement the social policies and programs used to discourage the elderly from retiring at relatively younger ages in the future. In this paper, it is argued that labor productivity growth and improvement in work attitude prior to retirement will help the elderly find little difficulties in having higher standard of living, despite their further lengthening of life expectancy at birth and post-retirement survival chances, the latter being often called the "third life". Most American people hope that the social-policy programs that have promoted early retirement will remain unchanged in the first part of the 21st century while they will put significant financial burden on their future descendants who have to work in the paid labor market. Taking this observation in consideration, this paper concludes that the U. S. government has to focus more on developing the programs that improve work propensity and labor productivity among the currently working-age population rather than continuing to implement the programs that sustain the recent reversal in retirement ages.ment ages.
Keywords
early retirement; retirement age; elderly social policy; retirement pension; corporate pension; worker propensity; labor productivity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bailey, Martin N.(1987), 'Aging and the Ability to Work: Policy Issues and Recent Trends,' in Work, Health, and Income among the Etderty, edited by Gary Burtless. pp. 59-96, Washington, D. C.: Brooking Institution
2 Cutler, D., James M. Poterba, Louise M. Steiner, and Lawrence Summers(1990), 'An Aging Society: Opportunity or Challenge?' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1-73. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution
3 Manton, Kenneth G. and Ehc Stollard(1994), 'Medical Demography: Interaction of Disability Dynamics and Mortality,' in Demography of Aging, edited by Linda G. Martin and Samuel H. Preston, pp. 217-279, Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press
4 Munnell, Alicia H.(1977), The future of Social Security, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
5 Quinn.(1999b), 'Has the Early Retirement Trend Reversed?' Chestnut Hill Massachusetts: Boston College and Retirement Research Consortium
6 Quinn and Richard V. Burkhauser(1994), 'Retirement and Labor Force Behavior of the Elderly.' in Demography of Aging, edited by Linda G. Martin and Samuel H. Preston, PP. 56-61, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press
7 U.S,Bureau of Census(1975),Hisorical Statistics of the United States: Colomat Times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govemment Printing Office
8 U.S. Social Security Administration (2003), Social Security Online, Office of Policy, http://www.ssa.gov/policy/
9 Krueger, Alan, and Joem-Steffen Pischke(1992), 'The Effects of Social Security on Labor Supply: A Cohort Analysis of the Notch Generation,' Journal of Labor Economics 10: 412-437   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tuma, Nancy Brandon, and Gary D. Sandefeur(1988), 'Trends in the Labor Force Activity of the Aged in the United States, 1940-1980,' in Issues in Contemporary Retirement, edited by Richard Campbell and E. Lazear, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution
11 Gruber, Jonathan, and David A. Wise(1999), 'Introduction and Summary, in Social Security and Retirement Around the Wortd, edited by Jonathan Gru-ber and David A. Wise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
12 Costa, D. L. (1998), The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880-1990. National Bureau of Economic Research, Harvard University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13 Burtless, and Robert A. Moffit(1985), 'The Joint Choice of Retirement Age and Postretirement Hours of Work,' Journal of Economics 3: 209-236
14 Quinn Richard V. Burkhauser, and Daniel A. Myers( 1990), Passing the Torch: The Influence of Economic Incentives on Work and Retirement. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Upjohn
15 Burtless, Barry (1986), 'Social Security, Unanticipated Benefit Increases, and the Timing of Retirement,' Review of Economic Studies 53: 781-805
16 Cutler, D., James M. Poterba, Louise M. Steiner, and Lawrence Summers(1990), 'An Aging Society: Opportunity or Challenge?' Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 1-73. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution
17 Geanakopolos, John, Olivia Mitchell, and Steve Zeldes(1998), 'Would a Priva-tized Ssocial Secuhty System Really Pay a Higher Rate of Return?" in Framing the SociaI Security Debate: VaIues, Politics, and Economics, edited by Arnold, R. D., M. J. Graetz and A. H. Munnell, pp. 137-156, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance
18 Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Robert Y. Shapiro(1998), 'Myths and Understandings about Public Opinions toward Social Security,' in framing the Social Security Debate: Vatues, Politics, and Economics, edited by Amold, R. D., M. J. Graetz and A. H. Munnell, PP. 355-388, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Social Insurance
19 Leimer, Dean(1994), 'Cohort Specific Measures of Lifetime Net Social Security Transfers.' ORS Workjng Papers No. 59, February, Office of Research and Statistics, Social Security Administration. Washington, D. C.: Social Security Administration
20 Gustman, Alan A., and Thomas L. Steinmeier(1994), 'Employer Provided Health Insurance and Retirement Behavior,' Industrial and Labor Retations 48: 124-140   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Quinn.(1999a), 'Retirement Patterns and Bridge Jobs in the 1990s,' EBRI Issue Brief No 206, February. Washington, D. C,: Employee Benefit Research Institute
22 Quinn, Joseph F.(1991), 'The Nature of Retirement: Survey and Econometric Evidence,' in Retirement and Public Policy, edited by Alicia Munnell, PP. 119-123, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall and Hunt
23 Ransom, Roger L., Richard Sutch, and Samuel H. Williamson(1991), 'Retirement: Past and Present,' in Retirement and Public PoIicy,. edited by Alicia Munnell, PP. 23-50, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall and Hunt
24 Employee(1997b), 'The 1977 Retirement Confidence Survey: Summary of Findings,' Washington, D. C.: Employee Benefit Research Institute
25 Bloendel, Sveinbjoern, and Stefano Scarpetta(1998), 'The Retirement Decision in OECD Countries,' Economic Department Working Paper No 202. Paris:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
26 Employee Benefit Research Institute(1997a), EBRI Data Book on EmpIoyee Benefits. 4th Edition. Washington, D.C.: Employee Benefit Research Institute
27 Bosworth, Barry and Gany Burtless (eds.) (1998), Aging Societies: The Global Dimension. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution
28 Employee(1997c), The Reality of Retirement Today: Lessons in Planning for Tmorrow. EBRI Poticy Brief No. 181. Washington, D.C.: Employee Benefit Research Institute
29 Kohl, Richard, and Paul O'Brien(1988), 'The Macroeconomics of Ageing, Pensions, and Savings: A Survey,' Economics Department Working Papers No. 20. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development