Browse > Article

A Study on the Transformation of Family Policy in Germany - Focused on Political Ideologies and Instruments of Major Political Parties  

이진숙 (대구대학교 사회복지학부)
Publication Information
Korea journal of population studies / v.25, no.1, 2002 , pp. 145-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explores the change of family policy in Germany focused on political ideologies and instruments of CDU/CSU and SPD. In past 50 years after the 2. world war the family policy in Germany has been influenced by ideologies of 2 major political parties. With conservative political perspectives, CDU and CSU intend to strengthen the institution family and traditional division of domestic work. Therefore, they prefer indirect support methods by income tax benefit for family as political instrument. SPD with liberal political perspectives intends to support working married women and children. As political instrument SPD prefers allowance for child to indirect support system. This different political perspectives of 2 major parties have been reflected automatically on the federal administrative system(BMFSFJ) which takes responsibility of family policy in Germany. Through the analysis of attitudes to family policy of major parties in Germany this paper attempts to be manifest the problem of korean family policy and to find implications of german modell.
Keywords
Family Policy; Germany; Family; Woman; Political Party;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 정재훈(2000), '경제적 관계의 세계화와 복지국가 발전에 대한 논의 - 독일 페미니즘의 전략을 중심으로', '한국사회복지학', 40, 191-225
2 양현모(1996), '주요제국의 행정제도 동향조사 (독일의 정부조직)', 한국행정연구원
3 엄규숙(1998), '서유럽의 복지제도와 여성정책', '연세여성연구', (4), 89-114
4 이진숙(2000), '사회과학적 토의에 비추어진 독일의 가족제도와 가족정책: 가족보고서를 중심으로', '가족과 문화', 12(1), 한국가족학회, 93-122
5 Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver (1995), Zukunft der Familie im vereintenDeutschland. Gesellschaftliche und politische Bedingungen, Munchen
6 (1996), Modernisierurtgsschube, Familie und Sozialstaat, Munchen
7 Lampert, Heinz (1996), Prioritat fur die Fomilie. Pladoyer fur die rationale Familienpolitik, Berlin
8 Munch, Ursula (1990), Familienpolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. MaBnahmen, Defizite, Organisation familienpolitischer Staatstatigkeit,Freiburg im Breisgau
9 Tonnies, Ferdinand (1887), Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Berlin
10 조흥식 . 김인수 . 김혜란 . 김혜련 . 신은주(2001), '가족복지학', 학지사
11 Wingen, Max (1997), Familienpolitik. Grundlagen und aktuelle Probleme, Bonn
12 (2001), '가족내 간병과 간병보험의 복지정책적 함의', '한국인구학', 한국인구학회, 24, 183-202
13 김재경(2000), '통일 후 독일의 여성 및 가족정책', '한 . 독사회과학논총', 한독사회과학회, 10(1), 1-29
14 Bundesministerium fur Familie und Senioren (Hg.) (1991), Leitsatze undEmpfehlungen zur Familienpolitik im vereinigten Deutschland, Stuttgart
15 Schelsky. Helmut(1954), 'Der Irrtum eines Familienministers', Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 08, 06, 1954
16 한겨레신문사(2002), '한겨레21', 3월 6일 발간, 제399호
17 Willeke, F.U. . Onken, R. (1990), Allgemeine Familienlastenausgleich in derBundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine empirische Analyse zu dreiJahrzehnten monetarer Familienpolitik, Frankfurt/Main
18 김성천 . 윤혜미(2000), '가족복지증진을 위한 정책 대안 연구', 보건복지부
19 Gerlach, Irene (1996), Familie und staatliches Handeln. Ideologic undpolitische Praxis in Deutschland, Opladen
20 정병기(2002), '독일 보수주의의 변천과 본질', '위클리 솔', 1월 14일자 보도
21 Bundesministerium fur Familie, Senioren, Frauen, Jugend(2002), StaatlicheHilfen fur Familien
22 Statistisches Bundesamt (Hg.) (1992), Handbuch zur ortlichen und regionalen Familienpolitik, Stuttgart