Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2012.29.3.045

Development of Evaluation Method for Performance of Weapon System using Axiomatic Design based Inner Dependence AHP  

Cho, Hyunki (방위사업청 분석시험평가국)
Kim, Woo-Je (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과)
Publication Information
Korean Management Science Review / v.29, no.3, 2012 , pp. 45-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Test and evaluation of weapon system is an important task to evaluate the performance of overseas weapon system purchasing project. Especially, quantitative evaluation of performances is hardly completed in defense projects where multiple criteria are conflicted each other. In order to solve this problem, we apply Axiomatic Design (AD) and Inner Dependence AHP method. First, finite functional requirements (FRs) are categorized in hierarchy structure by selecting proper design parameters (DPs) to implement their corresponding FRs. If there are no ways to select DPs when design is coupled between FRs and DPs, then inner dependence is allowed to overcome the strict rule of independence in AHP. Second, the weights of DPs are calculated by applying both Inner Dependence AHP method for coupled design and normal AHP method for uncoupled or decoupled design. Finally, information axiom of AD is applied to the proposed weapon systems by calculating information contents for all parameters. Weapon system with minimum sum of information contents is considered as the best solution. The proposed method in this study should be used in multiple criteria decision making problems involving various conflicting criteria.
Keywords
Axiomatic Design; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Inner Dependence AHP; Test and Evaluation; Final Source Selection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cheng, C.H., "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, No.2(1996), pp.343-350.
2 Cheng, C.H., K.L. Yang, C.L. Hwang, "Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.116(1999), pp.423-435.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cochran, D.S., J.F. Arinez, J.W. Duda, and J. Linck, "A Decomposition Approach for Manufacturing System Design," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.20, No.6(2001), pp. 371-389.   DOI
4 Dagdeviren, M., S. Yavuz, and N. Kilin, "Weapon selection using the AHP and TOP SIS methods under fuzzy environment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp.8143-8151.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Guenov, M.D. and S.G. Barker, "Application of axiomatic design and design structure Matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems," Systems Engineering, Vol.8, No.1 (2005), pp.29-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ho, W., "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.186(2008), pp.211-218.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 IHS Jane's Internet Homepage, www.janes.com, 2012.
8 Kahraman, C. and S. Cebi, "A New Multiattribute Decision Making Method：Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp. 4848-4861.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kulak, O., "A Decision Support System for Fuzzy Multi-attribute Selection of Material Handling Equipment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.29, No.2(2005), pp.310-319.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 강영주, 황윤동, 차성운, 정대진, 문용락, "공리적 설계에서 FRs의 상호 독립성을 정량적으로 측정하기 위한 도구의 개발", 한국정밀공학회지, 제18권, 제3호(2001), pp.122-130.   과학기술학회마을
11 Kulak, O., S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, "Applications of Axiomatic Design Principles： A Literature Review," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37(2010), pp.6705-6717.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kulak, O. and C. Kahraman, "Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems using Fuzzy vs. Crisp AD Approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.95(2005), pp.415-424.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Kulak, O. and C. Kahraman, "Fuzzy Multiattribute Selection among Transportation Companies using AD and AHP," Information Sciences, Vol.170(2005), pp.191-210.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lee, J.W., S.H. Kang, J. Rosenberger, S.B. Kim, "A Hybrid Approach of Goal Programming for Weapon Systems Selection," Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58(2010), pp.521-527.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback：The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
16 Suh, N.P., "Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems," Research in Engineering Design, Vol.10(1998), pp.189-209.   DOI
17 Vaidya, O.S. and S. Kumar, "Analytic hierarchy process：An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.169(2006), pp.1-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ohnishi, S., T. Yamanoi, H. Imai, "On a weight representation for inner dependence method AHP," ISCIII 2009 4th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, (2009), pp.113-117.
19 김찬수, 조규갑, "국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", IE Interfaces, 제21권, 제1호(2008), pp. 96-108.   과학기술학회마을
20 김상훈, "현대무기체계 시험평가제도 개선요인과 발전방안에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 서울산업대학교, 2008.
21 방위사업청 훈령 제170호 방위사업관리규정, 방위사업청, 2012.
22 이창효, 집단의사결정론, 세종출판사, 2000.
23 조현기, 김우제, "공리적설계/AHP를 이용한 해외무기체계 구매사업 제안서 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 한국군사과학기술학회지, 제14권, 제3호(2011), pp.441-457.   과학기술학회마을
24 차성운, 박경진 공역, 공리적 설계(1), Suh, N.P.저, 동명사, 2009.
25 Brown, C.A., "Teaching Axiomatic Design to Engineers-Theory, Applications and Software," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.24, No.3(2005), pp.186-195.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Brown, C.A., "Decomposition and Prioritization in Engineering Design," Proceedings of ICAD2011, The Sixth International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Daejeon-March 30-31, ICAD-2011-07, (2011), pp.41-47.
27 Cebi, S. and C. Kahraman, "Extension of Axiomatic Design Principles under Fuzzy Environment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.3(2010), pp.2682-2689.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Cebi, S. and C. Kahraman,, "Indicator Design for Passenger Car using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Principles," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.9(2010), pp.6470-6481.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Chen, C.H. and Y. Lin, "Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.142, No.1(2002), pp.174-186.   DOI   ScienceOn