Browse > Article

The Relationship of Privacy Violation and Psychological Distance in Korean Ubiquitous Government Service  

Cho, Sung-Bin (서강대학교 경영대학)
Kim, Jin-Hwa (서강대학교 경영대학)
Ha, Byoung-Chun (서강대학교 경영대학)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society / v.34, no.2, 2009 , pp. 15-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
Today the u-government services are becoming more personalized and intelligent. For the successful implementation of personalization, individual user's privacy concerns must be respected and taken care of. Based on the empirical survey results, this research summarizes the reluctance to the government's use of private information using six categories. We measure user's psychological distance toward e-government using the four levels, adopting the suggestions by the Proxemics. Since a positive correlation is Identified between people's psychological Intimacy toward e-government and their tolerance to the use of private Information, the amount and/or types of private information should be sequentially used in personalization systems. Initially allowing the least intolerable private information such as occupation information, the personalization system should additionally use the next tolerable Information such as health information or service request/interest information, as user's psychological distance toward government services becomes shorter.
Keywords
Ubiquitous Government; Privacy; Psychological Distance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alford, J., 'Defining the client in the public sector: a social-exchange perspective,' Public Administration Review, Vol.62, No.3(2002), pp.337-346   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Andrade, E.B., V. Kaltcheva, and B. Weitz, 'Self-disclosure on the web: the impact of privacy policy, reward, and company reputation,' Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.29, No. 1(2002), pp.350-353
3 Bailenson, J,N., J, Blascovich, A.C. Beall, and J,M. Loomis, 'lnterpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments,' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.29, No.7 (2003), pp.819-833   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Berners-Lee, T., J, Hendler, and O. Lassila, The semantic web, Scientific American, 2001
5 Fletcher, G.J,O. and L.A. Kininmonth, 'Measuring relationship beliefs : an individual differences scale,' Journal of Research in Personality, Vol.26, No.4(1992), pp.371-397   DOI
6 Hall, E.T., The hidden dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New York, 1966
7 ITU., 'Ubiquitous network societies: the case of Japan,' International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Document UNS/07, April 2005
8 Moon, Y.M., 'Intimate exchange: using computers to elicit self disclosure from consumers,' Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.26 (2000), pp.323-339   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Phelps, J., G. Novak, and E. Ferrell, 'Privacy concerns and consumers willingness to provide personal information,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.19(2000), pp.27-41   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Reis, H.T. and P. Shaver, Intimacy as an interpersonal process, in : S. Duck (Ed), Handbook of personal relationships : Theory, Research, and Interventions, Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1988, pp.367-390
11 Stem, B.B., 'Advertising intimacy: relationship marketing and the services consumer,' Journal of Advertising, Vol.26, No.4(1997), pp.7-19   DOI
12 McKenna, R., 'Real-time marketing,' Harvard Business Review, July-August(1995), pp.87-95
13 Li, N., J. Mitchell, and W. Winsborough, Design of a role-based trust-management framework., in M. Abadi and S.M. Bellovin, editors, Proceedings of the Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002, pp.114-130
14 Scott, V.M., K.E. Mottarella, and M.J. Lavooy, 'Does virtual intimacy exist? A brief exploration into reported levels of intimacy in online relationships,' Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Vol.9, No.6(2006), pp.759-761   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Gartner, Case study : Florida court are first to integrate criminal justice information statewide, May 2007
16 Oden, T.C., Game free: A guide to the meaning of intimacy, Harper and Row, New York, New York, 1974
17 Cederquist, J,G., R.J, Corin, M.A.C. Dekker, S. Etalle, den Hartog, J.I., and G. Lenzini, 'Audit-based compliance control,' International Journal of Information Security, Vol.6, No.2-3 (2007), pp.133-151   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hook, M.K., L.H. Gerstein, L. Detterich, and B. Gridley, 'How close are we? Measuring intimacy and gender differences,' Journal of Counseling and Development, Vol.81, No.4 (2003), pp.462-472   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pieterson, W., W. Ebbers, and J Dijk, 'Person-alization in the public sector : an inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.24(2007), pp.148-164   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Gartner, Government in 2020 : taking the long view, December 2005
21 Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler, Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1992
22 McMillen, D., 'Privacy, confidentiality, and data sharing: issues and distinctions,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.21(2004), pp.359-382   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Miline, G.R. and M.E. Gordon, 'Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.12, No.3 (1993), pp.206-215
24 Schedler, K. and L. Summermatter, 'Customer orientation in electronic government : motives and effects,' Government Information Quarterly, Vol.24(2007), pp.291-311   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Perlman, D. and E. Fehr, The development of intimate relationships, in : D. Perlman, S. Duck (Ed), Intimate Relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration, Sage, Newbury Park, California, 1987, pp.13-42
26 Chellappa, R.K. and R.G. Sin, 'Personalization versus privacy : an empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma,' Information Technology and Management, Vol.6(2005), pp.181-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Friedman, B., P.H. Kahn, and D.C. Howe, 'Trust online,' Communications cf the ACM, Vol.43, No.12(2000), pp.34-40   DOI
28 Schedler, K. and J. Felix, 'Quality in public management: the customer perspective,' International Public Management Journal, Vol.1, No.3(2000), pp.125-143   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Emmers-Sommer, T.M., 'The effects of communication quality and quantity indicators on intimacy and relational satisfaction,' Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol.21, No.3(2004), pp.399-411   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Moon, Y.M., 'Don't blame the computer:when self-disclosure moderates the self-serving bias,' Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vo1.12, No.1/2(2003), pp.125-137
31 Wang, H., M.K.O. Lee, and C. Wang, 'Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.41, No.3(1998), pp.63-70   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Culnan, M.J., 'Protecting privacy online : is self-regulation working?,' Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol.19, No.1(2000), pp.20-26   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Rezgui, A., A. Bouguettaya, and M.Y. Eltoweissy, 'Privacy on the web: facts, challenges, and solutions,' IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, Vol.1, No.6(2003), pp.40-49   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Volokh, E., 'Personalization and privacy,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.43, No.8, 2000, pp.84-88   DOI
35 Clarke, R.A, 'Information technology and dataveillance,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.31, No.5(1998), pp.498-512   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Pang, L.C. and D.F. Norris, 'Applying customer relationship management (CRM) to government,' Journal if Government Financial Management, Vol.51 , No.1 (2002), pp.40-44
37 Ho, A.T.K., 'Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative,' Public Administration Review, Vol.62, No.4(2002), pp.434-444   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Lee, H.J., 'Future ubiquitous government evolution: Government 3.0,' Ubiquitous Society Research Series (Korean), Vol.29(2007), pp.1-15
39 Roy Morgan Research, Privacy and the community, 2004, [Online] Available: http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/rcommunity.rtf
40 White, T.B. Deciding to reveal: consumer disclosure management in consumer/seller relationship, Doctoral dissertation, Duke University, 1999
41 Rennhard, M., S. Rafaeli, L. Mathy, B. Plattner, and D. Hutchinson, 'Towards pseudonymous e-commerce,' Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.4(2004), pp.83-111   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Hansen, H., 'Antecedents to consumers' disclosing intimacy with service employees,' Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.17, No.6 (2003), pp.573-588   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Belanger, F., L.D. Carter, and L.C. Schaupp, 'U-Government : a framework for the evolution of e-government,' Electronic Government-Inderscience, Vol.2, No.4(2005), pp.427-445
44 Manber, U., A Patel, and J. Robison, 'Experience with personalization on Yahoo!,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.43, No.8 (2000), pp.35-39   DOI
45 O'Neil, D., 'Analysis of Internet users' level of online privacy concerns,' Social Science Computer Review, Vol.19, No.1(2001), pp.17-31   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Allen, C., D. Kania, and B. Yaeckel, Internet world guide to one-to-one web marketing, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 1998
47 Ickinger, W.J. and Morris, S., Psychological characteristics and interpersonal distance, Tulane University, 2001
48 Peppers, D. and M. Rogers, The one to one future : building relationships one customer at a time, Doubleday, New York, New York, 1997
49 Anttiroiko, A.V., 'Towards ubiquitous government : the case of Finland,' e-Service Journal, Vol.4, No.1(2005), pp.65-99   DOI   ScienceOn