Browse > Article

A Study on the Effects Comes up to Outcome Behavior of the Perceived Justice on Human Resources Management System  

Youn, Dae-Hyok (신라대학교 경영정보과)
Publication Information
Abstract
This study aims at developing and empirically testing a comprehensive model of organizational justice derived from the prior empirical studies on organizational justice. The study seeks to understand the antecedents to and the consequences are addressed. The first question is what characteristics of the HRM systems determine the levels of perceived distributive and procedural justice. Hypotheses are derived from the two prominent theoretical models, i.e., the self-interests model (SIM) and the group value model (GVM). Those factors include neutrality, consistency, accuracy. ethicality. credibility. and reciprocity in the processes of making HRM decisions. All nine factors suggested by the two models aye adopted for this study as major determinants of both distributive and procedural justice. The second question of this study is related to the moderating effects of individual differences on the relationship between the SIM and GVM variables and perceived distributive and procedural justice in organizational contexts. The final research question deals with the consequences of perceived organizational justice. specifically job - related altitudes and organizational commitment. Job-related attitudes in this study refer to job satisfaction, job motivation, and job involvement, i.e., the willingness to make contributions. identification with organization, and intent to stay. In examining the consequences of perceived organizational justice, the study focuses on the interaction effects of procedural and distributive justice on the above nine outcome variables. The results show that both SIM and GVM variables significantly influence distributive and procedural justice. However, hierarchical regression analyses reveal that the GVM variables except more influence has been focused on the consequences of perceived distributive justice with regard to outcomes provided by the organization.
Keywords
Distributive Justice; Procedural Justice; Self-Interest Model; Group Value Model; Organizational Commitment; Job Satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior /
[ Alexander, S.;Ruderman, M. ] / Social Justice Research
2 /
[ 김석희 ] / 21C 조직행동
3 Equity, Relative Deprivation, and the Value Consensus Paradox /
[ Berned Wegener ] / Social Justice Research
4 조직공정성 : 평가기준과 지각된 공정성, 직무만족, 조직몰입, 봉급 만족과의 관계 /
[ 김명언;이현정 ] / 한국심리학회지
5 Equity, Quality and Need : What Determines Which Value Will be Used as the Basis for Distributive Justice? /
[ Deutch, M. ] / Journal of Social Issues
6 /
[ 小林敏男 ] / 정당성の 조건
7 Why Procedural Justice Organization? /
[ Greenberg, J.;Tyler, T.R. ] / Social Justice Research
8 Towar an Integrated Thory of Strategic International Human REsource Management /
[ Tyler, T.R.;Beechler, S.;Napir, N. ] / Academy of Management Review   DOI   ScienceOn
9 /
[ Stoner, J.A.F.;Freeman, R.E. ] / Management
10 /
[ Barney, J.B.;Wright, P.M. ] / On Becoming a Strategic Partner : The Rode of Human Resoureces in Gaining Computitive Asvantage (Working Paper)
11 /
[ Deley, J.E.;Doty, D.H. ] / Theoretical Fameworks in Strategic Human Resource Management : Universalistic, Contingemcy anf Configuration Perspectives (Working Paper)
12 해외진출기업의 인적자원관리 효과성에 대한 실증적 연구 /
[ 강성모 ] / 인하대학교 박사학위논문
13 Procedural Justice a Criterion in Allcation Decisions /
[ Barrett-Howard, E.;Tyler, T. ] / Journal of Personality and Social Psychology   DOI
14 /
[ 황경식(역) ] / 사회정의론(John Rawls, A theory of Justice)
15 Sentiments of Justice /
[ Raymond, B. ] / Social Justice Research   DOI
16 /
[ 황일청(편) ] / 한국사회의 불평등과 형평
17 /
[ 최광 ] / 분배정의와 재정정책
18 The Psychology of Procedural Justice : A Test of Group-Value Model /
[ Tyler, T.R. ] / Journal of Psychology and Social Psychology
19 /
[ Heneman, R.L ] / Merit Pay : Linking Pay Incerases to Performance Ratings