Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3740/MRSK.2003.13.6.369

Junction Size Dependence of Magnetic and Magnetotransport Properties in MTJs  

Sankaranarayanan, V.K. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University)
Hu, Yong-kang (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University)
Kim, Cheol-Gi (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University)
Kim, Chong-Oh (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University)
Lee, Hee-bok (Department of Pysics Education, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Materials Research / v.13, no.6, 2003 , pp. 369-373 More about this Journal
Abstract
Magneto-optic Kerr Effect(MOKE), AFM and magnetoresistance measurements have been carried out on as-deposited and annealed Magnetic Tunnel Junctions(MTJs) with junction sizes 180, 250, 320 and 380 $\mu\textrm{m}$ in order to investigate the correlation among interlayer exchange coupling, surface roughness and junction size. Relatively irregular variations of coercivity $H_{c}$ (∼17.5 Oe) and interlayer exchange coupling $H_{E}$ (∼17.5 Oe) are observed over the junction in as-deposited sample prepared by DC magnetron sputtering. After annealing at $200^{\circ}C$, $H_{c}$ decreases to 15 Oe, while $H_{ E}$ increases to 20 Oe with smooth local variation. $H_{E}$ shows very good correlation with surface roughness across the junction in agreement with Neel's orange peel coupling. The increasing slope per $\mu\textrm{m}$ of normalized $H_{c}$ and $H_{E}$ are same near junction edge along free-layer direction irrespective of junction size, giving relatively uniform $H_{c}$ and $H_{ E}$ for wider junction size. Thickness profiles of the junctions measured with $\alpha$-step show increasingly flat top surface for larger junctions, indicating better uniformity for large. junctions in agreement with the normalized$ H_{c}$ and H$/_{E}$ curves. TMR ratios also increase with increasing junction size, indicating improvement for larger uniform junctions.
Keywords
Coercivity; Exchange coupling; MTJ; Size effect;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 T. Miyazaki and N. Tezuka, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 139, L231 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 C. G. Kim, T. Shoyama, M. Tsunoda, M. Takahashi, T. Y. Lee and C. O. Kim Korean J.Magnetics, 7, 72 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 M. Julliere, Phys. Lett., 54A, 225 (1975)
4 M. Tsunoda, K. Nishigawa, S. Ogata, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80 (2002) 3135   DOI   ScienceOn
5 J. E. Mahan, Physical vapor deposition of thin films, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 2000, Ch. VII.5
6 S. S. P. Parkin, K. P. Roche, M. G. Samant, P. M. Rice, R. B. Beyers, R. E. Scheuerlein, E. J. OiSullivan, S. L. Brown, J. Bucchigano, D. W. Abraham, Yu Lu, M. Rooks, P. L. Trouilloud, R. A. Wanner and W. J. Gallagher., J. Appl. Phys., 85, 5828 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 3273 (1995)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 J. C. S. Cools, W. Kula, D. Mauri and T. Lin J. Appl. Phys., 85, 4466 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 J. C. Slonczewski, Phys. Rev., B39, 6995 (1989)   DOI   ScienceOn
10 J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, J. Nowak, P. LeClair and R. Meservey, Appl. Phys. Lett., 69, 708 (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn