Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22669/krsa.2020.36.4.043

Exploring Possibilities of Social Integration in Inclusionary Housing: Focusing on Inclusionary Zoning in the United States  

Park, Miseon (국토연구원 주택토지연구본부)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association / v.36, no.4, 2020 , pp. 43-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to explore the possibilities of social integration focused on the inclusionary housing scheme developed in the United States. Inclusionary housing is produced by inclusionary zoning with planning power. One of the main goals of developing inclusionary housing is to achieve social integration in neighborhoods. The author investigates the origin, evolution, characteristics, and mechanism of the inclusionary housing scheme in the United States. Results show that the inclusionary housing scheme utilizes market mechanism such as the incentives of floor ratio bonus, fast tract permit approach as well as the affordability obligation for the low-income households. Considering the policy orientation in the United States toward market mechanism, the inclusionary housing program has played a significant role in producing and preserving affordable housing for the underprivileged in affluent neighborhoods and has produced meaningful results in academic achievements, better job outcomes, health results, and social interaction even though it has been also criticized with by its superficiality. Finally, the author draws policy implications for housing policy in Korea from the lessons and limitations of the inclusionary housing mechanism.
Keywords
Inclusionary Housing; Inclusionary Zoning; Social Integration; Affordable Housing; Housing Policy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Schwartz, A., and K. Tajbaksh., 2001, Mixed-Income Housing as Social Policy: The Case for Diminished Expectations, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.
2 Schwartz, H., 2010, Housing Policy Is School Policy: Economically Integrative Housing Promotes Academic Success in Montgomery County, Maryland, A Century Foundation Report.
3 Thaden, E. and R. Wang., 2017, Inclusionary Housing in the United States: Prevalence, Impact, and Practices, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
4 Wilson W., 1987, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5 van Vliet W., 1998, The Encyclopedia of Housing, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
6 뉴욕타임스 기사 (2014.7.27.) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/nyregion/on-the-upper-west-side-a-house-divided-by-income.html (뉴욕타임즈 2014. 7.25. 논설: 최종접속 2019.11.13.)
7 미국 포용주택 프로그램 DB제공 홈페이지 (최종접속 2020.10.25.) https://gsn.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7703d10c1b964eb5b91a1d699944e95c
8 국토교통부, 2020, 2020년 주택업무편람.
9 박미선, 2016, 유엔 해비타트 III 새로운 도시의제의 기조에 비추어 본 한국 주택정책의 성과와 과제, 공간과 사회, 26(4), pp.40-76.
10 Brophy, P. and R. Smith., 1997, Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 3(2), pp.3-31.
11 Calavita, N, and A. Mallach., 2010, Inclusionary Housing, Incentives, and Land Value Recapture, Land Lines, January 7.
12 Gans, H., 1961, Planning and Social Life: Friendship and Neighbor Relations in Suburban Communities, Journal of the American Planning Association, 27(2), pp.134-140.   DOI
13 Hickey, R., L. Sturtevant, and E. Thaden., 2014, Achieving Lasting Affordability through Inclusionary Housing, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
14 Jacobus R., 2015, Inclusionary Housing: Creating and Maintaining Equitable Communities, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
15 Johnson, P., H. Ladd, and J. Ludwig., 2001, The Benefits and Costs of Residential-Mobility Programs for the Poor, Prepared for the Conference: "Opportunities, Deprivation, and the Housing Nexus: Trans-Atlantic Perspectives".
16 Joseph, M., and R. Chaskin., 2010, Living in a Mixed-Income Development: Resident Perceptions of the Benefits and Disadvantages of Two Developments in Chicago, Urban Studies, 47(11), pp.1-20.
17 Joseph, M, R. Chaskin, and H. Webber., 2008, The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty through Mixed-Income Development, Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), pp.369-409.   DOI
18 Kleit, R., 2002, Job Search Networks and Strategies in Scattered-site Public Housing, Housing Studies, 17(1), pp.83-100.   DOI
19 Levy, D., Z. McDade., and K. Dumlao., 2011, Effects from Living in Mixed-Income Communities for Low-Income Families, Urban Institute.
20 Popkin, S., L. Buron, D. Levy, and M. Cunningham., 2000, The Gautreaux Legacy: What Might Mixed-Income and Dispersal Strategies Mean for the Poorest Public Housing Tenants, Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), pp.911-942.   DOI
21 Saldov, M., 1998, "Social Mix", In W van Vliet (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Housing, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.549-550.
22 Sarkissian, W., 1976, "The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review", Urban Studies, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp.231-246.   DOI
23 Schwartz, A., 2006, Housing Policy in the United States: An Introduction. Routledge.