Browse > Article

Identify Modal Parameter by The Output Response of Structure Using Smart Sensor System  

Lee, Woo-Sang (한국건설기술연구원 복합구조연구실)
Heo, Gwang-Hee (건양대학교 토목공학과)
Park, Ki-Tae (한국건설기술연구원 복합구조연구실)
Jeon, Joon-Ryong (충남대학교 토목공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection / v.12, no.4, 2008 , pp. 149-160 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the research was carried out on how to identify the modal parameter by acquiring the output response of the structure only through the smart sensor system. The objective of this research is to verify the performance and the on-site adaptability of the smart sensor system that have been actively researched as the advanced measuring system so far. Smart Sensor System was developed so that the real-time dynamic measurement can be performed by means of MEMS-type accelerated sensor, 8 bit CPU, wireless MODEM. In the modal parameter identification test, random excitation was added to the cantilever beam, and then the response of the structure was obtained using the smart sensor system and the wire measurement system respectively. In analyzing the data, modal parameter was identified using NExT & ERA algorithm. Furthermore, the optimal measurement location was selected through EOT algorithm in order to obtain the qualified output response. Result of the test, it was possible to verify the on-site applicability of the smart sensor.
Keywords
EOT; ERA; Modal parameter; NExT; Smart sensor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ewins, D. J., Modal Testing : Theory, Practice and Application, R. S. P. 2000
2 Masanobu Shinozuka, Maria Q.Feng, Pai Chou, Yangbo Chen, chulsung Park, "MEMS-Based Wireless Real-Time Health Monitoring of Bridge", The 3rd International conference on Earthquake Engineering Najing, China, 8, 2004
3 Straser, E.G. and Kiremidjian, A.S., "A modular wireless damage monitoring system for structures". Report No. 128, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Envirmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1998
4 Salawu, O.S. and Williams, C., "Review of Full-Scale Dynamic Testing of Bridge Structures", Engineering Structure, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1995, pp. 113-121   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Jung, J.N., Applied System Identification, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1994
6 허광희, 이우상, 신재철, "SWMAS의 성능 검증을 위한 구조물의 동특성 분석" 한국구조물진단학회지, 제9권, 제4호, 2005. 10
7 허광희, 이우상, 김만구, "스마트 센서 기술을 이용한 구조물 건전도 모니터링 시스템 Part I: 스마트 센서의 개발과 성능평가" 한국구조물진단학회지, 제11권, 제2호, 2007. 03. pp. 134-144
8 Kurata, N., Spencer Jr., B.F., Ruiz-Sandoval, M., Miyamoto, Y. and Sako, Y., "A study on building risk monitoring using wireless sensor network MICA-Mote". First International Conference on Structural Healh Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, November 13-15, 2003
9 Straser, E.G. and Kiremidjian A.S., "A modular visual approach to damage monitoring for civil structures." Proceedings of SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials. 2719, 1996, pp. 112-122
10 Lynch, J.P., et al., "Field Validation of a Wireless Structural Monitoring System on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge", SPIE 10th, San Diego, CA, USA, March, 2003
11 Caicedo J.M., Dyke S.J., "Phase II SHM Benchmark Studies: Application of the NExT and ERA for Damage Detection", Proceedings of the IMAC XXI Conference, Orlando, Florida, February 3-6, 2003
12 Jung, J.N. and Pappa, R.S, "An Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Modal Parameter Identification and Model Reduction", Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, AIAA, Vol. 8, No. 5, 1985, pp. 620-627   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Caicedo, J.M., Dyke, S.J., Johnson, E. A., "NExT and ERA for Phase I of the IASC-ASCE Benchmark Problem: Simulated Data", Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, submitted, 2002
14 Heo, G., Wang, M. L. and Satpathi, D., "Optimal Transducer Placement for Health Monitoring of Long Span Bridge" Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 16, 1997, pp. 495-502   DOI   ScienceOn