Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2022.8.5.9

Analysis of Achievement Standards of 2015 Special Education Curriculum based on Bloom' Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Middle School Physical Education  

Lee, Okin (Dept. of Secondary Special Education, Jeonju Univ)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology / v.8, no.5, 2022 , pp. 9-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study attempted to analyze the achievement criteria of the 2015 special curriculum middle school physical education curriculum based on Bloom's new education goal taxonomy. To this end, 184 sentences based on the common curriculum and basic curriculum achievement standards of the relevant curriculum were analyzed into a total of 24 combinations of 4 dimensions of Bloom's new education goal taxonomy and 6 dimensions of cognitive courses. The results of the study are as follows. First, in the case of the special curriculum physical education and middle school achievement standards, unlike the analysis of the basic curriculum of elementary schools shown in previous studies, the 'procedural knowledge-applying' combination was the most common, and it was confirmed that there was a hierarchy by school level. In addition, the dimensions of knowledge and cognitive processes were relatively diverse, confirming the key points of physical education and middle school classes for disabled students. Second, in the case of the common curriculum among the lower curriculum, knowledge and cognitive process dimensions were relatively diverse except for cognitive process dimensions such as 'remember', and higher knowledge and cognitive process dimensions such as 'metacognitive knowledge' and 'creative'. Third, in the case of the basic curriculum among the lower curriculum, the 'procedural knowledge-applying' combination was excessively concentrated at 60.7%, which was analyzed to require improvementsary.
Keywords
2015 Special Education Curriculum; Physical Education; Disabilities; Bloom; Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals," NY: David McKay, 1956.
2 S. Kim, S. Baek, and S. Chae, "A Review of the Development of 'Achievement Standards and Evaluation Criteria' in National Level," Journal of Educational Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.47-73, 1998.
3 L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, P. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. C. Wittrock, "A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," NY: Longman, 2001.
4 S. Kim, and B. Park, "The Instructional Objectives of Elementary School Physical Education in Special Education: FromPerspectives of Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy," Korean Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.95-108, 2017.
5 M. Lee, M. Kim, and B. U. Jeon, "A Study on the Analysis of Instructional Objectives of the Revised Basic Curriculum for Special Education of 'Korean Language' Textbooks in 2011: Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 16. No. 1, pp.237-260, 2015.
6 Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 2," Sejong: Author, 2020.
7 Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 3," Sejong: Author, 2020.
8 W. Cho, and S. Kim, "Analysis of Achievement Standards of 2015 Revised High School Mathematics Curriculum Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.381-402, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.1.381   DOI
9 Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum: Part 1," Sejong: Author, 2022.
10 Ministry of Education, "2015 Special Education National Curriculum Explanation," Sejong: Author, 2017.
11 J. I. Choi, and S. H. Paik, "A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculumwith Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy," Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp.277-288, 2015.   DOI
12 D. R. Krathwohl, "A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview," Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.212-218, 2002.   DOI
13 P. W. Airasian, and H. Miranda, "The Role of Assessment in the Revised Taxonomy," Theory into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp.249-254, 2002.   DOI
14 K. B. Park, "Analysis of Social Studies Achieve Standards through Bloom's Taxonomy," The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.135-152, 2016   DOI
15 S. Do, "A Study on the Analysis of Instructional Objectives of 'Career and Vocation Education' Textbook Revised Basic Curriculum in the Secondary School for Special School in 2011: Based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives," The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp.471-492., 2014.