Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2021.7.4.449

Birth of artificial nature and the humanities of coexistence  

Lee, yongwook (Dept. of Korea Language&Literature, Jeonju Univ)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology / v.7, no.4, 2021 , pp. 449-460 More about this Journal
Abstract
The development process of cyber literature theory in the 1990s clearly shows the duality of the pursuit of symbolic power and desire through the formation and conflict of literary fields, collective intelligence. All desires are bound to be power-oriented, and cyber literature is meaningful in that network-space critics developed while advocating the humanities of coexistence. The failure of cyber literature theory is due to the conflicting desire of critical power between real and virtual spaces. Cyber literature theory in the 1990s was the first literary response to the birth of artificial nature, although the contradiction of desires revealed in symbolic power and the limitations of barking are clear. Literature discourse has always explored the relationship between the social conditions of the time (including technological progress) and art texts. Producing a new critical discourse encompassing the whole within the literary field of artificial nature is an important task in literature in the era of technology compilation, and humanities and technology must coexist. Through this paper, we examined the impact of the birth of artificial nature on humanities. This study is an important achievement of humanities engineering that understands, interprets, and leads technology.
Keywords
Artificial Nature; Humanities of Coexistence; Cyber Literature Theory;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yeo Guk-hyeon, "Cyber Literature' and Texting in the Cyber Era-Focused on Criticism of "The Challenge of Cyber Literary," "Culture Science" No. 11, History of Culture and Science, 1997.
2 Lee Sang-gil, "Culture Production and Domination: A Critical Study on Pierre Bourdieu's Field Theory". "The Press and Society", Vol. 9, No. 1, 2000, 7-47.
3 Imsan, "Collaboration between Artists and Engineers: 'Experiments in Art and Technology' Group," International Cultural Technology Promotion Institute Cultural Technology Convergence 5(4), 2019.
4 Lee Yong-wook, "The Challenge of Cyber Literature," Tomato, 1996.
5 Jo Yeon-hyeon, "The History of Contemporary Korean Literature," Human History, 1961.
6 Pierre Bourdie as Ha Tae-hwan. "Rules of Art - Origin and Structure of the Literary Field," Dong Mun-seon, 1999.
7 Seong-Woo Kwon, "PC Communication and the Role of Criticism", Quarterly Version Up, Fall 1997, 56-67.
8 Kim Dong-il and Yang Jeong-ae, "Artist as a Symbolic Struggler," "Culture and Society" Spring/Summer Issue, Volume 14, Korean Society for Cultural Studies, 2013, 177-233.
9 Kim Chun-sik, "The Formation of Literature Fields in the Early Years of Korean Journalism and Comparison of Aesthetic Modernity of Western Concepts," "Journal of East-West Comparative Literature" No. 12, Korea East-West Comparative Literature Association, 2005, 171-195.
10 Kim Tae-hwan, "The Concept of Autonomy and the Sociology of Literature," "Literature and Society" 14(3), Literature and Intellectual Property, 2001.
11 Lee Yong-wook, "Redomainization and Research Direction of Contemporary Korean Literature," "Language Studies" Vol.95, Korean Language Research Society, 2018, 293-313.
12 Jae-in Kim, "Cyber Art Challenge - Waiting for New Artists," University Culture, Spring 1997, University of Seoul.
13 Ra, Young-kyun, "Literary Field and Literature," "Research on Foreign Literature" No. 17, Institute of Foreign Literature," Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, 2004.
14 Ha-Soo, Jang, "Study on the Effect of Creative Characteristics of Cultural and Arts Organization Workers Regarding Self-efficacy and Business Performance," "The International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology" Vol.7 No.2, 2019.