1 |
M.H. Draper, E.S. Viirre, T.A. Furess, V.J. Gaw ron. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, pp.131. 2001.
|
2 |
Steinicke, F, Kuhl, S & Lappe, M. Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Trans Vis Com. Graph, 17(7), pp.888-99. 2011.
DOI
|
3 |
Yang, U., & Kim, G. J. Increasing the Effective Egocentric Field of View with Proprioceptive and Tactile Feedback. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.27-34. 2004.
|
4 |
Yang, U., & Kim, G. J. Increasing the geometric field of view in head mounted displays through proprioceptive task and multimodal feedback for effective close range interaction, Behaviour & Information Technology, Volume 29-Issue 2. 2010.
|
5 |
Lin, J. J., Duh, H. B., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., Furness, T. A. Effects of Field of View on Presence, Enjoyment, Memory, and Simulator Sickness in a Virtual Environment. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.164-171. 2002.
|
6 |
Moss, J. D., Austin, J., Salley, J., Coats, J., Muth, E. R. The effects of display delay on simulator sickness. Displays, 32, pp.159-168. 2011.
DOI
|
7 |
Steinicke, F., Kuhl, S., Lappe, M., Klaus., H. Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE, 17, pp.888-899. 2011.
DOI
|
8 |
Joong Ho Lee, Sei-Young Kim, Hae Cheol Yoon, Ji Hyung Park. An Empirical Study of Out-of -Body Experience Induced by Horizontal Camera Shift on Video See-through HMD. PROCEEDINGS OF HCI KOREA, 2014.2, pp.97-100. 2014.
|
9 |
Ni, T., Bowman, D. A., & Chen, J. Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Enviroments. Proceeding of Graphics Interface, pp.139-146. 2006.
|
10 |
Hassan, S. E., Hicks, J. C, Lei H., Turano, K. A. What is the minimum field of view required for efficient naviagation? Vision Research, 47, pp.2115-2123. 2007.
DOI
|
11 |
Rolland, J. P., Holloway, R. L., & Fuchs, H. A Comparison of Optical and Video See-through Head-Mounted Displays. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, pp.293-307. 1994.
DOI
|
12 |
Mania, K., Adelstein, B. D, Ellis, S. R., & Hill, M. I. Perceptual Sensitivity to Head Tracking Latency in Virtual Environments with Varying Degree of Scene Complexity. Proceedings of the 1st Sympositum on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 2004, pp.39-47. 2004.
|
13 |
Regan, M., Miller, G., Rubin, S., & Kogelnik, C. A real-time low-latency hardware light-field renderer. In Proc, of ACM SIGGRAPH' 99, pp.287-290. 1999.
|
14 |
MacKenzie, I. S., &Ware, C. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sytems, pp.488-493. New York: ACM. 1993.
|
15 |
Hughes, C. E., Stapleton, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Smith, E. M. Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. Ieee Computer Graphics and Applications. 25(6), pp.24-30. 2005.
DOI
|
16 |
Hyung-Nam Moon, Hee-in Cho, Youngmi Han. Mixed Reality(MR) Technology Trends and Development Prospect, The Journal of the Convergence Culture Technology (JCCT). Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.21-25. 2017.
DOI
|
17 |
Rolland, J. P, Barlow, T., Biocca, F. A., & Kancherla, A. Quantification of Adaptation to Vritual-Eye Location In See-Thru Head-Mounted Displays. Proceeding of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp.56-66. 1995.
|
18 |
Ronald T. Azuma. A survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Envionments 6, 4, pp.355-385. 1997.
DOI
|
19 |
Jan Herling, Wolfgang Broll. PixMix: A real-time approach to high-quality Diminished Reality. Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012.
|
20 |
Seong Jae Lee, Se Hyun Oh. Development of Training Instruments on Visual functions using HMD type Display and Investigation of its Demand. IJACT Vol.6 No.3 201-210, 2018.
|
21 |
Draper, M.H., Viirre, E.S., Furness, T. A., & Gawron, V. J. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, pp.129-146. 2001.
DOI
|
22 |
Rolland, J. P, Barlow, T., Biocca, F. A., & Kancherla, A. Quantification of Adaptation to Vritual-Eye Location In See-Thru Head-Mounted Displays, Proceeding of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp.56-66. 1995.
|
23 |
Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M. C., & Brooks Jr, F. P. Effect of Latency on Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.141. 2003.
|
24 |
Moss, J. D., Muth, E. R., Tyrrell, R. A., & Stephens, B. R. Perceptual thresholds for display lag in a real visual environment are not affected by field of view or psychophysical technique, Displays, 31, pp.143-149. 2010.
DOI
|
25 |
Sei-Young Kim, Joong Ho Lee, Ji Hyung Park. The effects of visual displacement on simulator sickness in video see-through head-mounted displays. ISWC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Pages pp.79-82. 2014.
|
26 |
Rolland, J. P., Holloway, R. L., & Fuchs, H. A Comparison of Optical and Video See-through Head-Mounted Displays. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, pp.293-307. 1994.
DOI
|
27 |
Park, M., Serefoglou, S., Schmidt, L., Radermacher, K., Schlick, C., & Luczak, H. Hand-Eye Coordination Using a Video See-Through Augmented Reality System. The Ergonomics Open Journal, pp.46-53. 2008.
DOI
|
28 |
Duh, H. B., Lin, J. J, Kenyon, R. V., Parker, D. E., & Furness, T. A. Effects of Field of View on Balance in an Immersive Environment. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.235-240. 2001.
|
29 |
Moss, J. D., Muth, E.R. Characteristics of Head- Mounted Displays and Their Effects on Simula tor Sickness. Human Factor, 53, pp.308-319. 2011.
DOI
|
30 |
Streepey, J. W., Kenyon, R. V., & Keshner, E. A. Field of View and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance. Gait Posture, 25, pp.49-55. 2007.
DOI
|
31 |
P. R. Desai et al. A Review Paper on Oculus Rift-A Virtual Reality Headset, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT). Volume 13 Number 4. 2014.
|
32 |
Davson, H. Physiology of the Eye, Pergamon, New York. 1990.
|
33 |
Keller, K., & Colucci, D. Perception in HMDs. What is it in Head Mounted Displays (HMDs) that really make them all so terrible?. Proc. SPIE, Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays III, pp.3362.1998.
|
34 |
Schiefele, J., Albert, O., Dorr, Kelz, M., Schmidt-Winkel, N. Evaluation of required HMD Resolution and Field of View for a Virtual Cockpit Simulation. Part of the SPIE Conference on Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays IV, pp.143-154. 1999.
|
35 |
Yang-Wai Chow, Ronald Pose, Matthew Regan, James Phillips. The effects of Head-Mounted Display Attributes on Human Visual Perception of Region Warping Distortions. Proc. of Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, pp.500-505. 2005.
|
36 |
Wright, S. L., Bailey, I. L., Tuan, K., & Wacker, R. T. Resolution and Legibility: A comparison of TFT LCDs and CRTs. Journal of the society for Information Display, 7(4), pp.253-256. 1999.
DOI
|
37 |
Huang, D., Patrick Rau, P., -L., & Liu, Y. Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, pp.81-89. 2009.
DOI
|
38 |
Jaa-Aro, K., & Kjelldahl, L. Effects of Image Resolution on Depth Perception in Stereo and Non-Stereo Images, Stockholm, Sweden. 1997.
|
39 |
Nattapong P., Fusak C. Contrast Image Enhancement Using Multi-Histogram Equalization. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology Vol.3 No.2 pp.161-170. 2015.
DOI
|
40 |
Lee, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Yoon, H. C., Huh, B. K., & Park, J. H. A Preliminary Investigation of Human Adaptations for Various Virtual Eyes in Video See-Through HMDs. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factor in Computing Systems, pp.309-312. 2013.
|