Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2019.5.2.345

Research Issues and Major Design Considerations on Video See-through HMDs  

Lee, Joong Ho (Dept. of intelligent robotics, WiseU Youngsan Univ)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology / v.5, no.2, 2019 , pp. 345-353 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Video See-through HMD(VSHMD) captures real-world view through a camera set mounted in front of the HMD. The VSHMD outputs this visual information in real time through the display in the HMD, which technique can be used as mixed reality, augmented reality, and virtual reality device. Recently, there is growing interest in VSHMD due to the rapid development of camera and display technology. However, VSHMD is still not free from many technical huddles and human factor issues. This paper summarizes the VSHMD related researches so far, presents the major issues to be solved in advance, and suggests design considerations that should be beneficial to VSHMD development, focused on the human factors, that presents solutions to effectively overcome the limitations of VSHMD functionalities in current.
Keywords
video See-through HMD; VSHMD; mixed reality; augmented reality; virtual reality;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 M.H. Draper, E.S. Viirre, T.A. Furess, V.J. Gaw ron. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, pp.131. 2001.
2 Steinicke, F, Kuhl, S & Lappe, M. Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Trans Vis Com. Graph, 17(7), pp.888-99. 2011.   DOI
3 Yang, U., & Kim, G. J. Increasing the Effective Egocentric Field of View with Proprioceptive and Tactile Feedback. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.27-34. 2004.
4 Yang, U., & Kim, G. J. Increasing the geometric field of view in head mounted displays through proprioceptive task and multimodal feedback for effective close range interaction, Behaviour & Information Technology, Volume 29-Issue 2. 2010.
5 Lin, J. J., Duh, H. B., Parker, D. E., Abi-Rached, H., Furness, T. A. Effects of Field of View on Presence, Enjoyment, Memory, and Simulator Sickness in a Virtual Environment. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.164-171. 2002.
6 Moss, J. D., Austin, J., Salley, J., Coats, J., Muth, E. R. The effects of display delay on simulator sickness. Displays, 32, pp.159-168. 2011.   DOI
7 Steinicke, F., Kuhl, S., Lappe, M., Klaus., H. Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays, Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE, 17, pp.888-899. 2011.   DOI
8 Joong Ho Lee, Sei-Young Kim, Hae Cheol Yoon, Ji Hyung Park. An Empirical Study of Out-of -Body Experience Induced by Horizontal Camera Shift on Video See-through HMD. PROCEEDINGS OF HCI KOREA, 2014.2, pp.97-100. 2014.
9 Ni, T., Bowman, D. A., & Chen, J. Increased Display Size and Resolution Improve Task Performance in Information-Rich Virtual Enviroments. Proceeding of Graphics Interface, pp.139-146. 2006.
10 Hassan, S. E., Hicks, J. C, Lei H., Turano, K. A. What is the minimum field of view required for efficient naviagation? Vision Research, 47, pp.2115-2123. 2007.   DOI
11 Rolland, J. P., Holloway, R. L., & Fuchs, H. A Comparison of Optical and Video See-through Head-Mounted Displays. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, pp.293-307. 1994.   DOI
12 Mania, K., Adelstein, B. D, Ellis, S. R., & Hill, M. I. Perceptual Sensitivity to Head Tracking Latency in Virtual Environments with Varying Degree of Scene Complexity. Proceedings of the 1st Sympositum on Applied perception in graphics and visualization, 2004, pp.39-47. 2004.
13 Regan, M., Miller, G., Rubin, S., & Kogelnik, C. A real-time low-latency hardware light-field renderer. In Proc, of ACM SIGGRAPH' 99, pp.287-290. 1999.
14 MacKenzie, I. S., &Ware, C. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sytems, pp.488-493. New York: ACM. 1993.
15 Hughes, C. E., Stapleton, C. B., Hughes, D. E., & Smith, E. M. Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. Ieee Computer Graphics and Applications. 25(6), pp.24-30. 2005.   DOI
16 Hyung-Nam Moon, Hee-in Cho, Youngmi Han. Mixed Reality(MR) Technology Trends and Development Prospect, The Journal of the Convergence Culture Technology (JCCT). Vol. 3, No. 3, pp.21-25. 2017.   DOI
17 Rolland, J. P, Barlow, T., Biocca, F. A., & Kancherla, A. Quantification of Adaptation to Vritual-Eye Location In See-Thru Head-Mounted Displays. Proceeding of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp.56-66. 1995.
18 Ronald T. Azuma. A survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Envionments 6, 4, pp.355-385. 1997.   DOI
19 Jan Herling, Wolfgang Broll. PixMix: A real-time approach to high-quality Diminished Reality. Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012.
20 Seong Jae Lee, Se Hyun Oh. Development of Training Instruments on Visual functions using HMD type Display and Investigation of its Demand. IJACT Vol.6 No.3 201-210, 2018.
21 Draper, M.H., Viirre, E.S., Furness, T. A., & Gawron, V. J. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors, 43, pp.129-146. 2001.   DOI
22 Rolland, J. P, Barlow, T., Biocca, F. A., & Kancherla, A. Quantification of Adaptation to Vritual-Eye Location In See-Thru Head-Mounted Displays, Proceeding of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp.56-66. 1995.
23 Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M. C., & Brooks Jr, F. P. Effect of Latency on Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.141. 2003.
24 Moss, J. D., Muth, E. R., Tyrrell, R. A., & Stephens, B. R. Perceptual thresholds for display lag in a real visual environment are not affected by field of view or psychophysical technique, Displays, 31, pp.143-149. 2010.   DOI
25 Sei-Young Kim, Joong Ho Lee, Ji Hyung Park. The effects of visual displacement on simulator sickness in video see-through head-mounted displays. ISWC '14 Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Pages pp.79-82. 2014.
26 Rolland, J. P., Holloway, R. L., & Fuchs, H. A Comparison of Optical and Video See-through Head-Mounted Displays. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, pp.293-307. 1994.   DOI
27 Park, M., Serefoglou, S., Schmidt, L., Radermacher, K., Schlick, C., & Luczak, H. Hand-Eye Coordination Using a Video See-Through Augmented Reality System. The Ergonomics Open Journal, pp.46-53. 2008.   DOI
28 Duh, H. B., Lin, J. J, Kenyon, R. V., Parker, D. E., & Furness, T. A. Effects of Field of View on Balance in an Immersive Environment. In Proc. Of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp.235-240. 2001.
29 Moss, J. D., Muth, E.R. Characteristics of Head- Mounted Displays and Their Effects on Simula tor Sickness. Human Factor, 53, pp.308-319. 2011.   DOI
30 Streepey, J. W., Kenyon, R. V., & Keshner, E. A. Field of View and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance. Gait Posture, 25, pp.49-55. 2007.   DOI
31 P. R. Desai et al. A Review Paper on Oculus Rift-A Virtual Reality Headset, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT). Volume 13 Number 4. 2014.
32 Davson, H. Physiology of the Eye, Pergamon, New York. 1990.
33 Keller, K., & Colucci, D. Perception in HMDs. What is it in Head Mounted Displays (HMDs) that really make them all so terrible?. Proc. SPIE, Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays III, pp.3362.1998.
34 Schiefele, J., Albert, O., Dorr, Kelz, M., Schmidt-Winkel, N. Evaluation of required HMD Resolution and Field of View for a Virtual Cockpit Simulation. Part of the SPIE Conference on Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays IV, pp.143-154. 1999.
35 Yang-Wai Chow, Ronald Pose, Matthew Regan, James Phillips. The effects of Head-Mounted Display Attributes on Human Visual Perception of Region Warping Distortions. Proc. of Image and Vision Computing New Zealand, pp.500-505. 2005.
36 Wright, S. L., Bailey, I. L., Tuan, K., & Wacker, R. T. Resolution and Legibility: A comparison of TFT LCDs and CRTs. Journal of the society for Information Display, 7(4), pp.253-256. 1999.   DOI
37 Huang, D., Patrick Rau, P., -L., & Liu, Y. Effects of font size, display resolution and task type on reading Chinese fonts from mobile devices. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, pp.81-89. 2009.   DOI
38 Jaa-Aro, K., & Kjelldahl, L. Effects of Image Resolution on Depth Perception in Stereo and Non-Stereo Images, Stockholm, Sweden. 1997.
39 Nattapong P., Fusak C. Contrast Image Enhancement Using Multi-Histogram Equalization. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology Vol.3 No.2 pp.161-170. 2015.   DOI
40 Lee, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Yoon, H. C., Huh, B. K., & Park, J. H. A Preliminary Investigation of Human Adaptations for Various Virtual Eyes in Video See-Through HMDs. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factor in Computing Systems, pp.309-312. 2013.