Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2015.25.5.139

A First-principles Study on the Surface Magnetism of the CsCl Structured CoX (X = Ti, V, Nb) (001) Surface  

Kim, Dong-Chul (Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Halla University)
Abstract
The surface magnetism of the CsCl structured Co binary compounds, CoX (X = Ti, V, Nb) (001) surface was studied with the calculated electronic structure data obtained by the full-potential linearized augmented plane-wave (FLAPW) method. The magnetic moment of the surface Co atom of the Co-terminated CoTi(001) system was $1.19{\mu}_B$, which is enhanced compared with that of the Co atom in the center layer. The magnetic moment of the surface V atom in the V terminated the CoV(001) system was $1.64{\mu}_B$, which is more than twice of the center layered V atom. The magnetic moment of surface Co atom in the Co terminated CoV(001) system has the value of $1.34{\mu}_B$, little bit smaller than the bulk value. The magnetism was disappeared in the Co terminated CoNb(001) system, and the magnetic moment of the surface Nb atom in the Nb terminated CoNb(001) system was $0.26{\mu}_B$ which is little bit decreased compared to the center layer value.
Keywords
Co binary compounds; surface magnetism; electronic structure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 N. Motta, M. de Crescenzi, and A. Balzarotti, Phys. Rev. B 27, 4712 (1983).   DOI
2 J. H. Weaver and D. T. Peterson, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3624 (1980).   DOI
3 R. S. Allgaier, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 28, 1293 (1967).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 E. A. Starke, C. H. Cheng, and P. A. Beck, Phys. Rev. 126, 1746 (1962).   DOI
5 D. A. Papaconstantopoulos, Phys. Rev. B 11, 4801 (1975).   DOI
6 D. A. Papaconstantopoulos and D. J. Negal, Int. J. Quantum Chem. S 5, 515 (1971).
7 R. Eibler, J. Redinger, and A. Neckel, J. Phys. F 17, 1533 (1971).
8 J. Y. Rhee, B. N. Harmon, and D. W. Lynch, Phys. Rev. B 54, 17385 (1996).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 J. Y. Rhee, B. N. Harmon, and D. W. Lynch, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1878 (1999).   DOI   ScienceOn
10 G. Canto and R. de Coss, Surf. Sci. 465, 59 (2000).   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Yu M. Kotoreev, A. G. Lipnitskii, E. V. Chulkov, and V. M. Silkin, Surf. Sci. 507-510, 199 (2002).   DOI   ScienceOn
12 S. V. Man'kovsky, A. A. Ostroukhov, V. M. Floka, and V. T. Cherepin, Vacuum 48, 245 (1997).   DOI   ScienceOn
13 A. Kellou, Z. Nabi, A. Tadjer, N. Amrane, N. Fenineche, and H. Aourag, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 239, 389 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981).
15 P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).   DOI
16 W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).   DOI
17 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).   DOI   ScienceOn
18 D. D. Koelling and B. N. Harmon, J. Phys. C 10, 3107 (1977).   DOI   ScienceOn