Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2015.25.4.123

Changes of Hysteresis Loop Characteristics of the Tendon Under Tensile Stress  

Kang, Sunju (Dept. of Photonics and Sensors)
Son, Derac (Dept. of Photonics and Sensors)
Joh, Changbin (Korea Institute of Civil Engin. and Building Tech.)
Lee, Jungwoo (Korea Institute of Civil Engin. and Building Tech.)
Abstract
The iron is an element having a high yield strength, mechanical hardness, good electrical conductivity, and also it has been used in various fields because of ease machining. In bridges have been used tendon made of a steel wire for large loads and light weight. Tension measurement of tendon employed in PreStressed Concrete (PSC) bridge is very important for the bridge safety check. NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) is essential for the safety check, however, magnetic NDT is difficult to apply due to the non-linear magnetization curve and hysteresis loop in the magnetic properties. In this work, for basic study of magnetic NDT application, we have constructed a B-H loop measuring system for 7-strand tendon of which diameter is 15.5 mm, and which can apply tensile stress up to 2.0 GPa. We have measured hysteresis loops of two kinds of tendons under different tensile stress. Amplitude permeability and maximum magnetic induction near knee show the most sensitive and high linearity depends on tensile stress. Relative amplitude permeability was decreased from 500 to 200 and maximum magnetic flux density changed 0.6 T.
Keywords
tendon; bridge; incremental permeability; amplitude permeability; NDT;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 H. J. Shin, S.-J. Song, and Y. H. Jang, Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing 20, 538 (2000).
2 D. Son, W. I. Joung, D.-G. Park, and K. S. Ryu, J. Magn. 14, 97 (2009).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 H. Kikuchi, K. Ara, Y. Kammada, and S. Kobayashi, J. Magn. 16, 427 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
4 K. S. Ryu, Y. T. Park, D. L. Atherton, and L. Clapham, Journal of the Korean Society for Nondestructive Testing 23, 263 (2003).
5 A. Jarosevic, Nato ASI Series 3 High Technology 65, 107 (1998).
6 B. Fernandes, J. D. Wade, D. K. Nims, and V. K. Devabhaktuni, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 23, 46 (2012).   DOI
7 S. Kang, C. Joh, J. Lee, and D. Son, Digests of the KMS 2014 Summer Conference 24, 110 (2014).
8 D. Son and J. Sievert, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 2017 (1990).   DOI   ScienceOn