Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2005.15.5.265

Exchange Bias Study by FMR Measurment  

Yoo, Yong-Goo (Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute)
Park, Nam-Seok (Department of Electrical and Electronic engineering, Chungju National University)
Min, Seong-Gi (Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University)
Yu, Seong-Cho (Department of Physics, Chungbuk National University)
Abstract
Exchange bias effect of a various layered thin films were studied by FMR measurment. In plane angular dependence of a resonance field distribution which measured by FMR was analysed as a combined effect of an unidirectional anisotropy and an uniaxial anisotropy. Exchange biased NiFe/IrMn, IrMn/NiFe/IrMn, and NiFe/IrMn/CoFe thin films showed larger unidirectional anisotropy field and uniaxial anisotropy field with compared to that of an unbiased NiFe single thin film. In case of NiFe/Cu/IrMn, the film with thick Cu layer exhibited a similar trend to the unbiased NiFe thin film. NiFe/IrMn/CoFe thin film showed two resonance field distribution due to different ferromagnetic layers. In additon to the resonance field, the line width was also analysed with related to exchange bias effect.
Keywords
exchange bias; ferromagnetic resonance; unidirectional anisotropy field and uniaxial anisotropy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. C. S. Kools, IEEE Trans. Magn., 32(4), 3165(I996)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 G. W. Anderson, M. Pakala, and Y. Huai, IEEE Trans. Magn., 36(5), 2605(2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 G. W. Anderson, Y. Huai, and M. Pakala, J. Appl. Phys., 87(9), 5726(2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 A. E. Berkowitz and K. Takano, J. Magn. & Mag. Mat., 299, 552(1999)
5 J. Nogues and I. K. Schuller, J. Magn. & Mag. Mat., 192, 203(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 W. H. Meklejohn and C. P. Bean, Phys. Rev., 105, 904(1957)   DOI
7 D. Mauri, H. C. Siegmann, P. S. Bagus, and E. Kay, J. Appl. Phys., 62, 3047(1987)   DOI
8 A. P. Malozemoff, Phys. Rev. B, 35, 3679(1987)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 M. D. Stiles and R. D. McMichael, Phys. Rev. B, 59(5), 3722(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
10 M. Rubinstein, P. Lubitz, and S. F. Cheng, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 195, 299(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 N. J. Gokemeijer, T. Ambrose, and C. L. Chien, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 4270(1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
12 T. Mewes, B. F. P. Roos, S. O. Demokritov, and B. Hillebrands, J. Appl. Phys., 87, 5064(2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
13 R. D. McMichael, M. D. Stiles, P. J. Chen, and W. F. Egelhoff, Phys. Rev. B, 58, 8605( 1998)   DOI
14 V. S. Speriosu and S. S. P. Parkin, IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG23, 2999(1987)
15 A. P. Malozemoff, J. Appl. Phys., 63, 3874(1988)   DOI
16 A. P. Malozemoff, Phys. Rev. B, 37, 7673(1988)   DOI   ScienceOn
17 N. J. Gokemeijer, T. Ambrose, and C. L. Chien, J. Appl. Phys., 81, 4999(1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 M. Kiwi, J. Magn. & Mag. Mat., 234, 584(2001)   DOI   ScienceOn
19 H. Xi, K. R. Mountfield, and R. M. White, J. Appl. Phys., 87, 4367(2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
20 J. Lindner and K. Baberschke, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 15, R193(2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
21 H. Xi and R. M. White, Phys. Rev. B, 60, 14837(1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
22 V. I. Nikitenko, V. S. Gomakov, L. M. Dedukh, Yu. P. Kabanov, A. F. Khapikov, A. J. Shapiro, R. D. Shull, A. Chaiken, and R. P. Michel, Phys. Rev. B, 57, R8111(1998)   DOI