Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2005.15.2.096

Structural, Magnetic, and Optical Studies on Normal to Inverse Spinel Phase Transition in FexCo3-xO4 Thin Films  

Kim, Kwang-Joo (Department of Physics, Konkuk University)
Kim, Hee-Kyung (Department of Physics, Konkuk University)
Park, Young-Ran (Department of Physics, Konkuk University)
Ahn, Geun-Young (Department of Physics, Kookmin University)
Kim, Chul-Sung (Department of Physics, Kookmin University)
Park, Jae-Yun (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Incheon)
Abstract
Phase transition from normal- to inverse-spinel structure has been observed for $Fe_xCo_{3-x}O_4$ thin films as the Fe composition (x) increases from 0 to 2. The samples were fabricated as thin films by sol-gel method on Si(100) substrates. X-ray diffraction measurements revealed a coexistence of two phases, normal and inverse spinel, for $0.76{\le}x{\le}0.93$. The normal-spinel phase is dominant for $x{\le}0.55$ while the inverse-spinel phase for $x{\ge}l.22$. The cubic lattice constant of the inverse-spinel phase is larger than that of the normal-spinel phase. For both phases the lattice constant increases with increasing x. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements revealed that both $Fe^{2+}$ and $Fe^{3+}$ ions exist with similar strength in the x=0.93 sample. Conversion electron $M\ddot{o}ssbauer$ spectra measured on the same sample showed that $Fe^{2+}$ ions prefer the octahedral $Co^{3+}$ sites, indicating the formation of the inverse-spinel phase. Analysis on the measured optical absorption spectra for the samples by spectroscopic ellipsometry indicates the dominance of the normal spinel phase for low x in which $Fe^{3+}$ ions tend to substitute the octahedral sites.
Keywords
spinel; crystal structure; optical absorption; magnetic hysteresis; Mossbauer spectroscopy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 C. D. Spencer, and D. Schroer, Phys. Rev., B 9, 3658(1974)   DOI
2 M. Lenglet, and B. Lefez, Solid State Commun., 98, 689(1996)
3 O. Muller, and R. Roy, The Major Ternary Structural Families, (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1974), p. 5
4 J. van Elp, J. L. Wieland, H. Eskes, P. Kuiper, G. A. Sawatzky, F. M. F. de Groot, and T. S. Turner, Phys. Rev., B 44, 6090(1991)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 K. J. Kim, Y. R. Park, D. H. Hyun, and S. H. Lee, J. Appl. Phys., 96, 1975(2004)   DOI   ScienceOn