[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.18204/JISSiS.2016.3.2.069

Application of 3D Simulation Surgery to Orthognathic Surgery of Hemimandibular Hypoplasia

Park, Jin Hoo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Jung, Young-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kwon, Sun-Mo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Lim, Jae-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Jung, Hwi-Dong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)

Publication Information

Journal of International Society for Simulation Surgery / v.3, no.2, 2016 , pp. 69-73 More about this Journal

Abstract

Traditionally 2D cephalometric analysis has been used for diagnosis and treatment of maxillofacial deformities. However, 2D has some limitations in diagnosis and treatment planning especially facial asymmetry cases. The most weakness of 2D is overlapping and unpredictability. Today 3D treatment tools are used by many maxillofacial surgeons. 3D treatment tools can show ungarbled facial anatomy and do virtual surgery. The aim of this report is to present usefulness of using 3D analysis and virtual orthognathic surgery for severe facial asymmetry patients.

Keywords

Facial asymmetry; Hemimandibular hypoplasia; Orthognatic surgery; Three-dimensional surgery; Simulation surgery;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Adams GL, et al. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2004;126(4):397-409 DOI
2	Kawamata A, Ariji Y, Langlais RP. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry. Dental Clinics of North America 2000;44(2):395-410
3	Mehra P, et al. Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 2011; 10(1):6-13 DOI
4	Plooij JM, et al. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. International journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2011;40(4):341-352 DOI
5	Ellis E 3rd, Johnson DG, Hayward JR. Use of the orthognathic surgery simulating instrument in the presurgical evaluation of facial asymmetry. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:805-811 DOI
6	Sarver DM. Esthetic orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. 1998: Mosby Incorporated
7	Swennen GR, Mollemans W, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2009;67(10):2080-2092 DOI
8	Schendel SA, Jacobson R, Khalessi S. 3-Dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? J Oral and Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1406-1414 DOI
9	Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Distraction Osteogenesis: Its Application in Severe Mandibular Deformities in Hemifacial Microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 1997;8(5):422-430 DOI
10	Hanson PR, Melugin MB. Surgical/Orthodontic Treatment of Mandibular Asymmetries. Seminars in Orthodontics 2009;15(4):268- 278