Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2020.24.1.039

Load-displacement Response of Gravity Load Designed Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames with Various Height of Masonry Infill Walls  

Han, Ji Min (Department of Architecture Engineering, Hanyang University)
Lee, Chang Seok (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.24, no.1, 2020 , pp. 39-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
Lightly reinforced concrete (RC) moment frames may suffer significant damage during large earthquake events. Most buildings with RC moment frames were designed without considering seismic loads. The load-displacement response of gravity load designed frames could be altered by masonry infill walls. The objective of this study is to investigate the load-displacement response of gravity load designed frames with masonry infill walls. For this purpose, three-story gravity load designed frames with masonry infill walls were considered. The masonry infilled RC frames demonstrated larger lateral strength and stiffness than bare RC frames, whereas their drift capacity was less than that of bare frames. A specimen with a partial-height infill wall showed the least drift capacity and energy dissipation capacity. This specimen failed in shear, whereas other specimens experienced a relatively ductile failure mode (flexure-shear failure).
Keywords
Masonry infill wall; Gravity load designed frames; RC moment frame;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Turgay T, Durmus MC, Binici B, Ozcebe G. Evaluation of the Predictive Models for Stiffness, Strength, and Deformation Capacity of RC Frames with Masonry Infill Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2014 Oct;140(10):06014003.   DOI
2 Lee HS, Woo SW. Effect of masonry infills on seismic performance of a 3-storey R/C frame with non-seismic detailing. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2002 Feb;31(2):353-378.   DOI
3 Kumar M, Rai DC, Jain SK. Ductility Reduction Factors for Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames. Earthquake Spectra. 2015 Feb;31(1):339-365.   DOI
4 Perrone D, Leone M, Aiello MA. Evaluation of the infill influence on the elastic period of existing RC frames. Eng Struct. 2016 Sep 15;123:419-433.   DOI
5 Crisafulli FJ. Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. University of Canterbury. Civil Engineering: University of Canterbury. c1997.
6 El-Dakhakhni WW, Elgaaly M, Hamid AA. Three-Strut Model for Concrete Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2003 Feb;129(2):177-185.   DOI
7 Fiore A, Spagnoletti G, Greco R. On the prediction of shear brittle collapse mechanisms due to the infill-frame interaction in RC buildings under pushover analysis. Eng Struct. 2016 Aug;121:147-159.   DOI
8 Sattar S, Liel AB. Seismic Performance of Nonductile Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infill Walls-I: Development of a Strut Model Enhanced by Finite Element Models. Earthquake Spectra. 2016 May;32(2):795-818.   DOI
9 Park JH, Jeon SH, Kang KS. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled Frame Structures using Equivalent Strut Models. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012 16(1):47-59.   DOI
10 Guevara LT, García LE. The Captive- and Short-Column Effects. Earthquake Spectra. 2005 Feb;21(1):141-160.   DOI
11 Yu E, Kim M, Jung D. A Comparison Study of Equivalent Strut Models for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled Frame. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2014 Mar;18(2):79-87.   DOI
12 Kim TW, Min CG. Analytical Study of the Effect of Full and Partial Masonry Infills on the Seismic Performance of School Buildings. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2013;17(5):197-207.   DOI
13 Elwood KJ, Baradaran Shoraka M, Yang TY. Collapse Probability of Existing Concrete Buildings: The Evolution of Seismic Rehabilitation in North America. In: Fischinger M, editor. Performance-Based Seismic Engineering: Vision for an Earthquake Resilient Society. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. c2014. pp. 469-483.
14 Moon KH, Jeon YR, Lee CS, Han SW. Evaluation of Performance of Korean Existing School Buildings with Masonry Infilled Walls Against Earthquakes. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012 Dec;16(6):37-46.   DOI
15 Han SW, Kwon OS, Lee LH. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a three-story ordinary moment-resisting concrete frame. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2004 May;33(6):669-685.   DOI
16 Han SW, Jee NY. Seismic behaviors of columns in ordinary and intermediate moment resisting concrete frames. Eng Struct. 2005 May;27(6):951-962.   DOI
17 Yu E, Kim MJ, Lee SH, Kim CM. Relation between Shear Strength of Masonry infills and Seismic Performance of Masonry-infilled Frames. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2015;19(4):173-181.   DOI
18 Kim BS, Park JH. Res ponse Modification Factors for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Non-seismic School Buildings with Partial Masonry Infills. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2019;23(1):71-82.   DOI
19 Korean Ministry of Education. Standard design of school buildings. Report 80-92-DA. Korea. c1980. (in Korean)
20 Korea Standards Association. KS F 2405. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Concrete. Republic of Korea. c2017.
21 Korea Standards Association. KS F 2403. Standard test methods for making and curing concrete specimens. Republic of Korea. c2014.
22 ACI. Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI. c2005.
23 Korea Standards Association. KS B 0802. Method of tensile test for metallic materials. Republic of Korea. c2018.
24 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. ASTM C1314-142014.
25 ASTM. Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension (Shear) in Masonry Assemblages. ASTM E519 / E519M-152015.
26 Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO. Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns. ACI Structural Journal. 2009 Jul-Aug;106(4):476-484.
27 ASCE 41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. c2017.
28 Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO. Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. c2006.
29 Kent DC. Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division. 1971;97(7):1969-1990.   DOI
30 Sezen H, Moehle JP. Shear Strength Model for Lightly Reinforced Concrete Columns. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2004 Nov;130(11):1692-1703.   DOI
31 Elwood KJ, Moehle JP. Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Light Transverse Reinforcement. Earthquake Spectra. 2005 Feb;21(1):71-89.   DOI
32 LeBorgne MR, Ghannoum WM. Analytical Element for Simulating Lateral-Strength Degradation in Reinforced Concrete Columns and Other Frame Members. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2014 Jul;140(7):04014038 1-12.
33 Berry MP, Eberhard MO. Performance modeling strategies for modern reinforced concrete bridge columns Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Contract No.: PEER 2007/07. c2008.
34 Ghannoum WM, Moehle JP. Rotation-Based Shear Failure Model for Lightly Confined RC Columns. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2012 Oct;138(10):1267-1278.   DOI
35 Di Ludovico M, Verderame GM, Prota A, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Experimental Behavior of Nonconforming RC Columns with Plain Bars under Constant Axial Load and Biaxial Bending. Journal of Structural Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)st. 1943-541x.0000703. 2013;139:897-914.   DOI
36 Rodrigues H, Furtado A, Arede A. Behavior of Rectangular Reinforced-Concrete Columns under Biaxial Cyclic Loading and Variable Axial Loads. Journal of Structural Engineering. doi:10.1061/(ASCE) st.1943-541x.0001345. 2016;142:04015085-1-8.   DOI