Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2016.20.6.351

Effects of Lap Splice Details on Seismic Performance of RC Columns  

Kim, Chul-Goo (Architecture, Seoul National University)
Park, Hong-Gun (Architecture, Seoul National University)
Kim, Tae-Wan (Urban, Design and Architecture, Kangwon National University)
Eom, Tae-Sung (Architectural Engineering, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.20, no.6, 2016 , pp. 351-360 More about this Journal
Abstract
In regions of low-to-moderate seismicity, various types of lap splices are used for longitudinal reinforcement of columns at the plastic hinge zones. The seismic performance of such lap spliced columns, such as strength, deformation capacity, and energy dissipation, is affected by material strengths, longitudinal re-bar size, confinement of hoops, lap splice location, and lap splice length. In the present study, cyclic loading tests were performed for columns using three types of lap splices (bottom offset bar splice, top offset bar splice, and splice without offset bend). Lap splice length($40d_b$ and $50d_b$) was also considered as test parameters. Ties with 90-degree end hooks were provided in the lap splice length. The test results showed that strength, deformation capacity, and energy dissipation of columns significantly differed depending on the details and the length of lap splices. The bottom offset bar splice showed high ductility and energy dissipation but low strength; on the other hand, the top offset bar splice and the splice without offset bend showed high strength but moderate ductility and energy dissipation.
Keywords
Lap splice details; Lap splice length; Seismic performance; Column; Offset bar;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 KCI 2012. Building Code for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Korea Concrete Institute. c2012.
2 ACI 318-14. Building Code Requirements for structural concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute. c2014.
3 ACI 315-99. Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement. American Concrete Institute. c1999, 44 p.
4 Lynn AC, Moehle JP, Mahin SA, Holmes WT. Seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete building columns. Earthquake Spectra. 1996;12(4):715-739.   DOI
5 Melek M, Wallace JW. Cyclic behavior of columns with short lap splices. ACI Structural Journal. 2004;101(6):802-811.
6 Aboutaha RS, Engelhardt, MD, Jirsa JO, Kreger ME. Experimental investigation of seismic repair of lap splice failures in damaged concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal. 1999;96(2):297-306.
7 Haroun MA, Elsanadedy HM. Fiber-reinforced plastic jackets for ductility enhancement of reinforced concrete bridge columns with poor lap-splice detailing. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2005;10(6):749-757.   DOI
8 Harries KA, Ricles JM, Pessiki S, Sause R. Seismic retrofit of lap splices in nonductile square columns using carbon fiber-reinforced jackets. ACI Structural Journal. 2006;103(6):874-884.
9 ElGawady M, Endeshaw M, McLean D, Sack R. Retrofitting of rectangular columns with deficient lap splices. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2010;14(1):22-35.   DOI
10 Boyes A, Bull DK, Pampanin S. Seismic performance of concrete columns with inadequate transverse reinforcement. 2008:1-12.
11 Harajli M. Seismic behavior of RC columns with bond-critical regions: Criteria for bond strengthening using external FRP jackets. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2008;12(1):69-79.   DOI
12 Bournas DA, Triantafillou TC, Zygouris K, Stavropoulos F. Textilereinforced mortar versus FRP jacketing in seismic retrofitting of RC columns with continuous or lap-spliced deformed bars. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2009;13(5):360-371.   DOI
13 Kim CG, Eom TS, Park HG, Kim TW. Seismic performance of RC columns with lap splices at plastic hinge region. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2015;31(12):23-33.
14 CSA. Design of Concrete Structure. Canadian Standard Association. c2004.
15 Eurocode 2. Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. British Standards Institute. c2004.
16 ACI 374.1-05. Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. American Concrete Institute. c2005. 9 p.
17 Orangun CO, Jirsa JO, Breen JE. A reevaulation of test data on development length and splices. ACI Journal Proceedings. 1977;74(3):114-122.