Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.5.023

Shaking Table Test for an Evaluation of the Limit State Capacity of an Anchor Foundation in the case of a Seismic Event  

Kim, Min-Kyu (한국원자력연구소 종합안전평가부)
Choi, In-Kil (한국원자력연구소 종합안전평가부)
Kwon, Hyung-O (브이테크)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.14, no.5, 2010 , pp. 23-31 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, a shaking table test was performed for the evaluation of the failure capacity of an anchor foundation system in the case of an aged condition. For the shaking table test, three kinds of specimens were manufactured as follows: 1) a non-damaged anchor; 2) a specimen with cracks running through the anchor; and 3) a specimen with cracks along the expected corn-shape fracture away from the anchor. A dynamic characteristic was determined through a measurement of the frequency response function (FRF), and the seismic capacity was evaluated by using a shaking table test. Failure capacities were calculated using an acceleration response and it was compared with the anchor design code.
Keywords
Aging; Frequency response function; Shaking table test; Failure capacity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rodriguez, M., Zhang, Y.G., Lotez, D., Graves III, H.L., and Klingner, R.E., “Dynamic behaviour of anchors in cracked and uncracked concrete: a progress report,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 168, 23-34, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 NUREG/CR-5563, A Technical Basis for Revision to Anchorage Criteria, USNRC, Washigton, D.C., 1999.
3 NUREG/CR-5434, Anchor Bolt Behavior and Strength During Earthquake, USNRC, Washigton, D.C., 1998.
4 Obata, M., Inoue, M., and Goto, Y., “The failure mechanism and the pull-out strength of a bond-type anchor near a free edge,” Mechanics of Materials 28, 113-122, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 한국콘크리트학회 (2007), 콘크리트구조설계기준 2007.
6 US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.60, Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 1973.
7 Javier Malvar and C. Allen Ross, Review of Strain Rate Effects for Concrete in Tension, ACI Materials Journal, V. 95, No. 6, November-December, 1998.
8 KAERI/CM-1033/2007, 가동 중 원전 내 주요 안전설비의 경년열화 손상특성 조사 2008.03.07
9 SQUG, Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment, 1993.
10 US NRC, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants 3.8.4 Appendix E (Draft Rev. 2), 1996.
11 KINS-G-001, 경수로형 원자력발전소 안전심사지침서, 한국원자력안전기술원, 1999.10.
12 ACI 349-97, “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safe-Related Concrete Structures,” App. B, “Steel Embedments,” American Concrete Institute, 1997.
13 Jang, J.B., and Suh, Y.P., “The experimental investigation of a crack’'s influence on the concrete breakout strength of a cast-in-place anchor,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236(9), 948-953, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 ACI 349-01 “Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Related Concrete Structures,” APPENDIX C-Special Provisions for Impulsive and Impactive Effects, American Concrete Institute, 2001.
15 CEB Design Guide, “Design of Fastenings in Concrete,” 1997.
16 장정범, 서용표, 이종림, “직매형 앵커기초의 설계기준 개선에 관한 연구,” 대한토목학회 논문집, 23(6A), 1331-1338, 2003.
17 Stangenberg, F., and Jankowski, D., “Anchorages under Tensile Loading A Nonlinear Numerical Analysis,” Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping, 38, 341-353, 1989.   DOI   ScienceOn