1 |
Chopra, A.K., and Chintanapakdee, C., “Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures : single degree of freedom bilinear systems,” Report No. EERC 2003-09, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of Calif. at Berkeley, CA, 2003.
|
2 |
Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E, “Inelastic displaceme nt ratios for evaluation of existing structures,” Earthauake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(8): 1237-1258, 2003.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Ibarra, L. F., and Krawinkler, H., “Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations,” Report TR-152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, CA, 2005.
|
4 |
Han, S.W., Chopra A.K., “Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; l35:1853-1873, 2006.
|
5 |
Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E, “Probabilis tic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performacebased design,” Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn,;36:1235-1254, 2007.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Chopra A.K. Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 3rd Edition, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 2007.
|
7 |
Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, “Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions,” Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, Vol. 2, 895-912, 1960.
|
8 |
Federal Emergency Management Agency.(FEMA), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA-356, 2000.
|
9 |
Applied Technology Council, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Redwood City, Calif, 1996.
|
10 |
Federal Emergency Management Agency.(FEMA), Assessment of Improved Nonlinear Static seismic analysis procedures, Report FEMA-440, Washington, D.C. 2005.
|
11 |
Oscar M.Ramirez et al, “Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems,” Earthquake Spectra, 18(3): 531-547, 2002.
DOI
ScienceOn
|