Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2017.21.4.181

Assessment of Code-specified Ground Motion Selection Criteria with Accurate Selection and Scaling Methods - II Seismic Response  

Ha, Seong Jin (Korea Electric Power Research Institute)
Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architecture, Hanyang University)
Oh, Jang Hyun (Department of Architecture, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.21, no.4, 2017 , pp. 181-188 More about this Journal
Abstract
Current seismic design provisions such as ASCE 7-10 provide criteria for selecting ground motions for conducting response history analysis. This study is the sequel of a companion paper (I - Ground Motion Selection) for assessment of the ASCE 7-10 criteria. To assess of the ASCE 7-10 criteria, nonlinear response history analyses of twelve single degree of freedom (SDF) systems and one multi-degree of freedom (MDF) system are conducted in this study. The results show that the target seismic demands for SDF can be predicted using the mean seismic demands over seven and ten ground motions selected according to the proposed method within an error of 30% and 20%, respectively
Keywords
Seismic design provision; Criteria; Seismic demand; Ground motion; Selection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ASCE. Minimum design loads for building and other structures (ASCE 7-10). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. c2010.
2 Reyes JJ, Kalkan E. How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure? Earthq Spectra. 2012 Aug;28(3):1223-1242.   DOI
3 Kalkan E, Celebi M. Assessment of ASCE-7 ground motion scaling method using computer model of instrumented high-rise building. Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. San Francisco, CA, USA. c2009.
4 Araujo M, Macedo L, Marques M, Castro JM. Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2016 Jul;45(1):129-148.   DOI
5 ASCE. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. c2014.
6 CEN. ENV 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. c2004.
7 NZS. NZS 1170.5: 2004 Structural design actions. Part 5: earthquake actions - New Zealand. New Zealand Standard, Wellington, New Zealand. c2004.
8 Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W. NGA project strong motion database. Earthq Spectra. 2012 Feb;24(1), 3-44.   DOI
9 Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report No. 132. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.c1999.
10 Wang G. A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes. Soil Dyn and Earthq Eng. 2011 Apr;31(4):611-625.   DOI
11 PEER. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, California University, Berkeley, CA, USA. c2099.