Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2017.21.4.171

Assessment of Code-specified Ground Motion Selection Criteria with Accurate Selection and Scaling Methods - I Ground Motion Selection  

Ha, Seong Jin (Korea Electric Power Research Institute)
Han, Sang Whan (Department of Architecture, Hanyang University)
Ji, Hyun Woo (Department of Architecture, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.21, no.4, 2017 , pp. 171-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
For estimating the seismic demand of buildings, most seismic design provisions permit conducting linear and nonlinear response history analysis. In order to obtain reliable results from response history analyses, a proper selection of input ground motions is required. In this study, an accurate algorithm for selecting and scaling ground motions is proposed, which satisfies the ASCE 7-10 criteria. In the proposed algorithm, a desired number of ground motions are sequentially scaled and selected from a ground motion library without iterations.
Keywords
Seismic design provision; Response history analysis; Ground motion; Selection; Algorithm;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ASCE. Minimum design loads for building and other structures (ASCE 7-10). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. c2010
2 CEN. ENV 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. c2004.
3 NZS. NZS 1170.5: 2004 Structural design actions. Part 5: earthquake actions - New Zealand. New Zealand Standard, Wellington, New Zealand. c2004.
4 Shantz TJ. Selection and scaling of earthquake records for nonlinear dynamic analysis of first mode dominate bridge structures. Proceedings of the 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering. San Francisco, CA, USA. c2006.
5 Ay BO, Akkar S. A procedure on ground motion selection and scaling for nonlinear response of simple structural systems. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2012 Oct:41(12):1693-1707.   DOI
6 Ha SJ, Han SW. An efficient method for selecting and scaling ground motions matching target response spectrum mean and variance. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2016 Jul:45(8):1381-1387.   DOI
7 Kottke A, Rathje EM. A semi-automated procedure for selecting and scaling recorded earthquake motions for dynamic analysis. Earthq Spectra. 2008 Nov;24(4):911-932.   DOI
8 Jayaram N, Lin T, Baker JW. A computationally efficient groundmotion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance. Earthq Spectra. 2011 Aug;27(3):797-815.   DOI
9 Wang G. A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes. Soil Dyn and Earthq Eng. 2011 Apr;31(4):611-625.   DOI
10 Han SW, Ha SJ, Seok SW. Efficient and accurate procedure for selecting ground motions matching target response spectrum. Nonlinear Dynam. 2014 Oct;78(2):889-905.   DOI
11 Reyes JJ, Kalkan E. How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure? Earthq Spectra. 2012 Aug:28(3):1223-1242.   DOI
12 AIK. Architectural Institute of Korea. Korean Building Code, KBC 2016. c2016.
13 Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W. NGA project strong motion database. Earthq Spectra. 2012:Feb:24(1), 3-44.   DOI
14 Boore DM, Atkinson G.M. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra. 2008 Feb;24(1):99-138.   DOI
15 Han SW, Choi YS. Seismic hazard analysis in low and moderate seismic region-Korean peninsula. Struct Saf. 2008 Nov;30(6):543-558.   DOI
16 Baker JW. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection. J Struct Eng-ASCE. 2010 Feb;137(3):322-331.
17 Han SW, Seok SW. Efficient Procedure for Selecting and Scaling Ground Motions for Response History Analysis. J Struct Eng-ASCE. 2014 Jan;140(1):06013004   DOI