Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2015.19.2.045

A Discussion on the Improvement of Pseudo-Static Seismic Design Criteria of Retaining Wall in Domestic  

Jo, Seong-Bae (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, KAIST)
Ha, Jeong Gon (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, KAIST)
Lee, Jin-Sun (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wonkwang Univ.)
Kim, Dong-Soo (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, KAIST)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.19, no.2, 2015 , pp. 45-53 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper reviews the current seismic design code and research for dynamic earth pressure on retaining structures. Domestic design codes do not clearly define the estimation of dynamic earth pressure and give different comments for seismic coefficient, wall inertia and distribution of dynamic earth pressure using Mononobe-Okabe method. AASHTO has been revised reflecting current research and aims for effective seismic design. Various design codes are analyzed to compare their performance and economic efficiency. The results are used to make improvement of current domestic seismic design code. Further, it is concluded that the experimental investigation is also needed to verify and improve domestic seismic code for dynamic earth pressure.
Keywords
Seismic Design; Dynamic Earth Pressure; Retaining Wall; Mononobe-Okabe method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Seo HY, Park KS, Kim IH, Kim DS. A discussion on the improvement of seismic design criteria of infrastructures. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2014;18(5):231-240.   DOI
2 Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs. Standard drawing of railroad retaining wall. c2008.
3 Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs. Korean Bridge Design Code. Korea Road & Transportation Association. c2010.
4 Ministry of Land. Transportation and Maritime Affairs. Structure Foundation Design Code. Korea Geotechnical Society. c2008.
5 Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Ports and Fishing Harbors Design Code. Korea Ports & Harbours Association. c2014.
6 Ministry of Construction and Transportation. Research of Seismic Design Criteria (II). Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. c1997.
7 Okabe S. General theory of earth pressure. Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers. 1926;12(1):123-134.
8 Mononobe N and Matsuo H. On the Determination of Earth Pressure During Earthquakes. Proceedings, World Engineering Conference. 1929;9:179-187.
9 Seed HB and Whitman RV. Design of earth retaining structures for dynamic loads. Proceedings of ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures; Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y., 1970 Jun;103-147.
10 Lee JS. Dynamic Bearing Pressure of Inverted T-type Retaining Walls Subjected to Seismic Motion. Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012;16(2):35-45.   DOI
11 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Load and Resistance Factor Design Bridge Design Specifications. 6th Edition. c2012.
12 Comite Europeen de Normalisation. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures. Geotechnical Aspects. CEN, Brussels. c2004.
13 Nakamura S. Reexamination of Mononobe-Okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests. Soils and foundations. 2006;46(2):135-146.   DOI
14 Al Atik L. and Sitar N. Seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. 2010;136(10):1324-1333.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Anderson DG, Martin GR, Lam IP, and Wang JN. Seismic Analysis and Design of Retaining Walls, Slopes and Embankments, and Buried Structures, NCHRP Report 611. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. c2008.
16 Sitar N, Mikola RG, Candia G. Seismically induced lateral earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls. Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice:Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress 2012. 2012:335-358.
17 Jo SB, Ha JG, Yoo MT, Choo YW, Kim DS. Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests. Bulletin of earthquake engineering. 2014;12(2):961-980.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Jo SB, Ha JG, Kim DS. Effect of wall flexibility on the seismic behaviour of cantilevered retaining wall, submitted to Geotechnique.