Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2012.16.1.047

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled Frame Structures using Equivalent Strut Models  

Park, Ji-Hun (인천대학교 도시건축학부)
Jeon, Seong-Ha (인천대학교)
Kang, Kyung-Soo (동명대학교 건축공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.16, no.1, 2012 , pp. 47-59 More about this Journal
Abstract
The seismic performance of masonry-infilled frame structures, typical in school buildings, is evaluated through equivalent strut models. A bare frame model, concentric strut models and eccentric strut models with various material characteristics available in the literature are analyzed. Displacements and damage states at the performance points obtained by the capacity spectrum method show great differences among the models. Infill walls act positively in concentric strut models and negatively in eccentric strut models at the performance points for a given seismic demand. In addition, the behavior at the ultimate displacements shows considerably different strengths, inter-story drifts, and numbers and locations of damaged members among various modeling methods and material strengths.
Keywords
Masonry-infilled frame; Equivalent diagonal strut; Seismic performance evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 한국시설안전공단, 국내실정에 맞는 취성파괴형 및 삼중수평 저항 시스템 건축물의 내진성능평가기법 개발, 한국시설안전공단, 2008.
2 Paulay, T., and Priestley, M.J.N., Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley & Sons, inc, New York, 1992.
3 Stafford-Smith, B., ans C. Carter, "A Method of Analysis for Infilled Frames," Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 44, 1969.
4 ATC, Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, FEMA 306, FEMA, Washington, D.C., 1998.
5 Riddington, J. R. and Stafford Smith, B., "Analysis of Infilled Frames Subject to Racking with Design Recommendations," The Structural Engineer, Vol. 55, No. 6, 263-268, 1977.
6 ATC, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, ATC 40, California Seismic Safety Commission, California, 1996.
7 Crisafulli, F.J., Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concerete Structures with Masonry Infills, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New zealand, 1997.
8 Hashemi, A., Mosalam, K.M., Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Including Effects of Masonry Infill Walls, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
9 장준호, 김영문, "비내진 저층 철근콘크리트 골조의 횡방향 반복 하중에 관한 거동," 대한건축학회병합논문집, 제4권, 제4호, 127-133, 2002.
10 신종학, 김현산, "프레임 면내 조적메움벽의 내력 및 효율성에 관한 실질적 거동," 대한건축학회논문집, 제5권, 제1호, 173-182, 1989.
11 이정한, 차승렬, 강대언, 오상훈, 이용재, 이원호, 김상대, "RC 프레임면내 조적채움벽의 내진성능 평가에 관한 실험적 연구," 학술발표논문집, 대한건축학회, 제24권, 제1호, 39-42, 2004.
12 최호, "무보강 콘크리트 블록채움벽을 갖는 RC 프레임의 정적가력실험," 대한건축학회논문집, 제23권, 제4호, 2007.
13 ASCE, Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41-06, ASCE, Reston, Virginia, 2007.
14 El-Dakhakhni, W.W., Mohamed E., Hamid, A.A., "Three-strut Model for Concrete Masonry-Infilled Steel Frames," Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 2, 127-185, 2003.
15 Dolsek, M., Fajfar, P., "Mathematical modelling of an infilled RC frame structure based on the results of pseudodynamic tests," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, Issue 6, 1215-1230, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 황성록, 김진상, 윤태호, "조적끼움벽을 고려한 기존학교건물의 비탄성거동," 대한건축학회병합논문집, 제10권, 제4호, 2008.
17 고현, 김현수, 박용구, 이동근, "비내력벽을 가진 RC모멘트저항골조의 지진거동 평가," 한국지진공학회논문집, 제14권, 제5호, 13-22, 2010.
18 김희철, 김관중, 박진호, 홍원기, "지진하중을 고려한 비보강조적조의 재료특성 평가에 관한 실험연구," 한국지진공학회논문집, 제5권, 제2호, 93-101, 2001.
19 이원호, 이정한, 강대언, 양원직, "조적개체 재료특성에 관한 실험적 연구," 대한건축학회논문집, 제20권, 제12호, 45-52, 2004.   과학기술학회마을
20 ASCE, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, ASCE, Reston, Virginia, 2010.
21 대한건축학회, 건축구조기준 및 해설, 기문당, 2009.
22 Fardis, M.N., Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings based on EN-Eurocode 8, Springer, New York, 2009.
23 FEMA, NEHRP Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, FEMA 178, Washington, D.C., 1992.