Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.1.009

Design of Lateral Load Resisting System using Nonlinear Static Analysis  

Song, Jin-Gyu (전남대 건축학부)
Kim, Geon-Woo (전남대 대학원)
Jung, Sung-Jin (한남대 건축학부)
Song, Young-Hoon (삼성물산(주) 건설부문 기술연구소)
Lee, Seung-Chang (삼성물산(주) 건설부문 기술연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.10, no.1, 2006 , pp. 9-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
The design practice of the lateral resisting system has been traditionally dependent on the experience and know-how of a structural engineer. And the method to reflect the evaluation results of building's capacity on design process doesn't exist. The proposal of a rational design of the lateral load resisting system is based on the available full capacity $(R_{ac})$ of a building and the minimum required capacity $(R_{code})$ suggested in the code. This study suggests thai nonlinear static analysis, which is the estimation of the lateral capacity with the pushover analysis, be included in the existing design procedure of the structure. After finishing the basic structural design, the lateral resisting capacity ol a building is estimated. At the phase of nonlinear static analysis, pushover analysis is peformed to define the fully yielded baseshear $(V_Y)$. When the design wind baseshear $(V_{wind})$ is bigger than the design seismic baseshear $(V_D)$, the value is checked to determine whether or not it is smaller than the $V_Y$. After confirming that it is smaller, the $R_{ac}$ of the structure is computed. If the $V_D$ is bigger at first, only the $R_{ac}$ is computed. When the value of the estimation shows remarkable differences with the $R_{code}$, repetition of the design modification is needed for those approximate to the $R_{code}$. Application of the proposed design procedure to 2-D steel braced RC buildings has proven to be efficient.
Keywords
lateral resisting system; available full capacity; minimum required capacity; nonlinear static analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 FEMA, NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures(Part 2 Commentary), FEMA 303, Fedral Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, 1997
2 MIDAS/Gen, General structure design system-MIDAS/Gem Ver. 6.3.5 Program, MIDAS Information Technology Co., LTD., 2004
3 ATC, A critical review of current approaches to earthquake-resistant design, ATC 34, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996
4 Elnashai, A. S. and Mwafy, A. M., 'Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings,' Sturct. Design Tall Build, 11, 2002, pp. 329-351   DOI   ScienceOn
5 ATC, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings Volume 1, ATC 40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1996
6 Chopra, AK and Goel, R, 'A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: theory and preliminary evaluation', PEER 2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2001
7 FEMA, NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures(Part 1 Provision), FEMA 302, Fedral Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C, 1997
8 이동근, 최원호, 안지희, '건축구조물의 비선형 지진응답 평가를 위한 개선된 지진하중 분배방법', 한국지진공학회 논문집, 제5권, 제2호, 2001년 4월, pp 33-47
9 김건우, 송진규, '고차모드 영향이 반영된 Pushover 해석을 위한 횡하중 분배계수 제안', 한국지진공학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2005년 3월, pp. 236-242   과학기술학회마을
10 Peter Fajfar, 'A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design,' M.EERI, 2000, pp. 573-592
11 FEMA, NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C,1997
12 대한건축학회, '건설교통부 고시 건축구조설계기준', 대한건축학회, 2005