Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2006.10.1.001

Comparisons of Numerical Analyses considering the Effects of Shear Strength Degradation For Nonseismic Designed RC Frame  

Lee, Young-Wook (군산대학교 건축공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / v.10, no.1, 2006 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nonseismic designed RC frame have a possibility of shear failure because of deficiencies of reinforcing details. To model the shear failure in numerical analysis, shear strength degradation models which Include Moehle's and ATC 40 are compared and applied to push-over analysis. For numerical analysis, three storied building frame is selected and designed according to Korean Concrete Design Code(2003). As results, It is shown that Moehle's shear strength degradation model estimates the shear strength lower than NZSEE model and has less variation than ATC 40 model and all the shear strengths of models are greater than the nominal shear strength of ACI 318. Also, from the numerical analysis, it is pointed out that there may be great difference in lateral drift capacity if a different shear strength model is used. And the capacity can be severely underestimated if the restraining model of plastic rotation of ATC 40 is used, compared to the use of shear spring model for shear degradation.
Keywords
nonseismic design; reinforced concrete frame; shear failure; strength degradation model; push-over analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Priestley, MJN, 'Displacement Based Seismic Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frames,' Pacific Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Vol 2, Nov. 1995, pp. 225-244
2 ACI Committee, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02), American Concrete Institute, 2002
3 ATC 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, California Seismic Safety Commission, 1996
4 Hoffmann, G.W., Kunnath, S.K., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B., 'Gravity-Load-Designed Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Seismic Evaluation of Existing Construction and Detailing Strategies for Improved Seismic Resistance,' Technical Report NCEER-92-0016, NCEER, 1992
5 Beres, A., EI-Borgi, S., White, R.N. and Gergely, P., 'Experimental Results of Repaired and Retrofitted Beam-Coulumn Joint Tests in Lightly Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings,' Technical Report NCEER-92-0025, NCEER, 1992
6 한국콘크리트학회, 콘크리트 구조설계 기준 해설, 2003
7 대한건축학회, 건축물의 하중기준 및 해설, 2000
8 Giberson, M. F., 'Two Nonlinear Beams with Definitions of Ductility,' Journal of the Structural Division of ASCE, Vol 95, No ST2, Feb., 1969, pp. 137 - 157
9 Carr., A.J., RUAUMOKO, Computer Program Library, Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Canterbury, New Zealand. 2001
10 Moehle, J.P., Elwood, K.J. and Sezen, H., 'Gravity Load Collapse of Building Frames During Earthquakes,' ACI-SP197: S.M. Uzumeri Symposium - Behavior and Design of Concrete Structures for Seismic Performance, ACI 2002
11 The Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Earthquake Risk Buildings, NZSEE, 1996
12 Iman, S., 'Adaptive Pushover Analysis for the Seismic Assessment of Older Reinforced Concrete Buildings,' University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 2000