Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2020.28.4.63

Technology Intelligence based on the Co-evolution Analysis : Semiconductor Package Process Case  

Lee, Byungjoon (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
Shin, Juneseuk (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Technology Innovation / v.28, no.4, 2020 , pp. 63-93 More about this Journal
Abstract
We suggest a new way of specifying the co-evolution of product and process technologies, and integrating it into one of the well-received technology intelligence tools - a technology radar. Cross impact analysis enables us to identify the core technologies of product-process co-evolution. Combining expert judgment with its results, we can clarify the technological co-evolution trajectory with mainstream as well as emerging core technologies. Reflecting these in the assessment process of a technology radar, we could improve reliance of the technology assessment process and technology portfolio. From the academic perspective, our research provides a point where the co-evolution theory encouners technology intelligence methods. Practically, strategic capability of future-preparedness and strategic management could improve by adopting our method based on our example of co-evolution of semiconductor product and process technologies.
Keywords
Co-evolution; Technology Intelligence; Technology Radar; Cross Impact Analysis; Semiconductor Equipment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the evolution of industries. In Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation (pp. 7-27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
2 Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2015). The evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Business History, 57(5), 664-687.   DOI
3 Metcalfe, S. (Ed.). (2018). Evolutionary theories of economic and technological change: present status and future prospects (Vol. 44). Routledge.
4 Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403.   DOI
5 Nelson, R. R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and corporate change, 3(1), 47-63.   DOI
6 Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
7 Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1-9.   DOI
8 Rinne, M. (2004). Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 67-80.   DOI
9 Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285.   DOI
10 Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Springer Science & Business Media.
11 Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. CUP Archive
12 Sahal, D. (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley.
13 Saviotti, P. P. (2005). On the co-evolution of technologies and institutions. In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems (pp. 9-31). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
14 Schoder, D. (2000). Forecasting the success of telecommunication services in the presence of network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 12(2), 181-200.   DOI
15 Wagner A. 2011. The origins of evolutionary innovations. A theory of transformative change in living systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
16 권철신, 박준호, 장동훈 (2003), "로드맵의 표현방식과 작성절차에 대한 이론적 고찰", 「한국경영과학회」
17 황기하 (2008), "기술로드맵의 활용 현황 및 향후 발전방향", 「한국과학기술기획평가원」
18 박현석 (2014), "Function-based Patent Analytics for Technology Intelligence", 「포항공과대학교 대학원」
19 이동희 (2018), "크로스 임팩트분석을 활용한 국내 ICT 융합산업의 정보보호정책 분석", 「충북대학교 대학원」
20 Allen, P. M., & Sanglier, M. (1978). Dynamic models of urban growth. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1(3), 265-280.   DOI
21 Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of product innovation management, 26(1), 3-23.   DOI
22 Belloc, F., Nicita, A., & Parcu, P. L. (2013). Liberalizing telecommunications in Europe: path dependency and institutional complementarities. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 132-154.   DOI
23 정용복 (2012), "기술로드맵을 위한 핵심기술선정에 관한 연구", 「성균관대학교 대학원」
24 Leonard Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.   DOI
25 Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M. E. (2018). Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105-116.   DOI
26 Basalla G. (1988). The History of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27 한국정보화진흥원(2009), "성공적 공공 정책 수립을 위한 미래전략 연구 방법론 (FROM) version 1.0"
28 Dedehayir, O., & Makinen, S. J. (2011). Determining reverse salient types and evolutionary dynamics of technology systems with performance disparities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1095-1114.   DOI
29 Ibsen, C. L., & Skovgaard Poulsen, L. (2007). Path dependence and independent utility regulation: The case of Danish energy and telecommunications regulation. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55(1), 41-63.   DOI
30 Siri Boe-Lillegraven, Stephan Monterde (2015). Exploring the cognitive value of technology foresight: The case of the Cisco Technology Radar, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101 (2015) 62-82   DOI
31 Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2008). Vertical integration and disintegration of computer firms: a history-friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2), 197-231.   DOI
32 David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
33 Brenner, M.S., 1996. Technology intelligence and technology scouting. Competitive Intelligence Review 7, 20-27.   DOI
34 Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.   DOI
35 David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice innovation and economic growth: essays on American and British experience in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
36 David, P. A., & Rothwell, G. S. (1996). Standardization, diversity and learning: Strategies for the coevolution of technology and industrial capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 181-201.   DOI
37 Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of evolutionary economics, 4(3), 153-172.   DOI
38 Durand, T.(1992), "Dual technological trees: Assessing the intensity and strategic significanceof technological change", Research Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.361-380.   DOI
39 Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. London: Pinter.
40 Ginsberg, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of management review, 10(3), 421-434.   DOI
41 IEEE EPS(Electronics Packaging Society (2019). Heterogeneous integration roadmap: Identifying long-term technology requirements for advancing the eletronics industry. IEEE.
42 Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
43 Kerr, C. I., Mortara, L., Phaal, R. Y. P. D. R., & Probert, D. R. (2006). A conceptual model for technology intelligence. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), 73-93.   DOI
44 Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter & S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, 185-205.   DOI
45 Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994). Co evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 45-62.   DOI
46 Langlois, R. N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1999). The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1947-1996. The Sources of Industrial Leadership, 19-78.
47 Lee, S., Mortara, L., Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2011). Corporate document mining for technology intelligence: An analysis of needs, utilisation and possibilities. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 7(2), 110-127.   DOI
48 Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783-831.   DOI