Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2020.28.4.63

Technology Intelligence based on the Co-evolution Analysis : Semiconductor Package Process Case  

Lee, Byungjoon (성균관대학교 기술경영학과)
Shin, Juneseuk (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Technology Innovation / v.28, no.4, 2020 , pp. 63-93 More about this Journal
Abstract
We suggest a new way of specifying the co-evolution of product and process technologies, and integrating it into one of the well-received technology intelligence tools - a technology radar. Cross impact analysis enables us to identify the core technologies of product-process co-evolution. Combining expert judgment with its results, we can clarify the technological co-evolution trajectory with mainstream as well as emerging core technologies. Reflecting these in the assessment process of a technology radar, we could improve reliance of the technology assessment process and technology portfolio. From the academic perspective, our research provides a point where the co-evolution theory encouners technology intelligence methods. Practically, strategic capability of future-preparedness and strategic management could improve by adopting our method based on our example of co-evolution of semiconductor product and process technologies.
Keywords
Co-evolution; Technology Intelligence; Technology Radar; Cross Impact Analysis; Semiconductor Equipment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Malerba, F. (2007). Innovation and the evolution of industries. In Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation (pp. 7-27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
2 Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2015). The evolution of the pharmaceutical industry. Business History, 57(5), 664-687.   DOI
3 Metcalfe, S. (Ed.). (2018). Evolutionary theories of economic and technological change: present status and future prospects (Vol. 44). Routledge.
4 Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403.   DOI
5 Nelson, R. R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and corporate change, 3(1), 47-63.   DOI
6 Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
7 Rinne, M. (2004). Technology roadmaps: Infrastructure for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 67-80.   DOI
8 Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285.   DOI
9 Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1-9.   DOI
10 Rohrbeck, R. (2010). Corporate foresight: towards a maturity model for the future orientation of a firm. Springer Science & Business Media.
11 Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. CUP Archive
12 Sahal, D. (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation. Addison-Wesley.
13 Saviotti, P. P. (2005). On the co-evolution of technologies and institutions. In Towards Environmental Innovation Systems (pp. 9-31). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
14 Schoder, D. (2000). Forecasting the success of telecommunication services in the presence of network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 12(2), 181-200.   DOI
15 Wagner A. 2011. The origins of evolutionary innovations. A theory of transformative change in living systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
16 권철신, 박준호, 장동훈 (2003), "로드맵의 표현방식과 작성절차에 대한 이론적 고찰", 「한국경영과학회」
17 황기하 (2008), "기술로드맵의 활용 현황 및 향후 발전방향", 「한국과학기술기획평가원」
18 박현석 (2014), "Function-based Patent Analytics for Technology Intelligence", 「포항공과대학교 대학원」
19 이동희 (2018), "크로스 임팩트분석을 활용한 국내 ICT 융합산업의 정보보호정책 분석", 「충북대학교 대학원」
20 Allen, P. M., & Sanglier, M. (1978). Dynamic models of urban growth. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1(3), 265-280.   DOI
21 Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of product innovation management, 26(1), 3-23.   DOI
22 Belloc, F., Nicita, A., & Parcu, P. L. (2013). Liberalizing telecommunications in Europe: path dependency and institutional complementarities. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(1), 132-154.   DOI
23 정용복 (2012), "기술로드맵을 위한 핵심기술선정에 관한 연구", 「성균관대학교 대학원」
24 Basalla G. (1988). The History of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25 Leonard Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.   DOI
26 Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M. E. (2018). Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105-116.   DOI
27 한국정보화진흥원(2009), "성공적 공공 정책 수립을 위한 미래전략 연구 방법론 (FROM) version 1.0"
28 Dedehayir, O., & Makinen, S. J. (2011). Determining reverse salient types and evolutionary dynamics of technology systems with performance disparities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(10), 1095-1114.   DOI
29 Ibsen, C. L., & Skovgaard Poulsen, L. (2007). Path dependence and independent utility regulation: The case of Danish energy and telecommunications regulation. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 55(1), 41-63.   DOI
30 Siri Boe-Lillegraven, Stephan Monterde (2015). Exploring the cognitive value of technology foresight: The case of the Cisco Technology Radar, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 101 (2015) 62-82   DOI
31 Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2008). Vertical integration and disintegration of computer firms: a history-friendly model of the coevolution of the computer and semiconductor industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2), 197-231.   DOI
32 Brenner, M.S., 1996. Technology intelligence and technology scouting. Competitive Intelligence Review 7, 20-27.   DOI
33 Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.   DOI
34 David, P. A. (1975). Technical choice innovation and economic growth: essays on American and British experience in the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
35 David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
36 David, P. A., & Rothwell, G. S. (1996). Standardization, diversity and learning: Strategies for the coevolution of technology and industrial capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 181-201.   DOI
37 Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of evolutionary economics, 4(3), 153-172.   DOI
38 Durand, T.(1992), "Dual technological trees: Assessing the intensity and strategic significanceof technological change", Research Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.361-380.   DOI
39 Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, organisations and institutions. London: Pinter.
40 Ginsberg, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of management review, 10(3), 421-434.   DOI
41 IEEE EPS(Electronics Packaging Society (2019). Heterogeneous integration roadmap: Identifying long-term technology requirements for advancing the eletronics industry. IEEE.
42 Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
43 Kerr, C. I., Mortara, L., Phaal, R. Y. P. D. R., & Probert, D. R. (2006). A conceptual model for technology intelligence. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), 73-93.   DOI
44 Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R.C., Nelson, R.R., Winter & S.G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24, 185-205.   DOI
45 Levinthal, D., & Myatt, J. (1994). Co evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 45-62.   DOI
46 Langlois, R. N., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1999). The evolution of competitive advantage in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1947-1996. The Sources of Industrial Leadership, 19-78.
47 Lee, S., Mortara, L., Kerr, C., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2011). Corporate document mining for technology intelligence: An analysis of needs, utilisation and possibilities. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 7(2), 110-127.   DOI
48 Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings papers on economic activity, 1987(3), 783-831.   DOI