Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.3.001

Effects of Attitudes Toward Reasons for which Abortion is Permitted on Needs for Abortion Prevention Policies among Female Students  

Yoo, Gye-Sook (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, Kyung Hee Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of Families and Better Life / v.30, no.3, 2012 , pp. 1-11 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of attitudes toward reasons for which abortion is permitted on needs for abortion prevention policies among 232 unmarried female students at the middle schools, high schools, and universities located in Seoul. The respondents were requested to complete the self-administered questionnaire, and the principal component analysis, t-tests, Pearson's correlations, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for analyzing data. The major findings of this study were as follows: First, the principal component analysis identified three reasons for which abortion is permitted. These are reasons under the maternal & child health law, socioeconomic reasons, and normatively unqualified reasons. Second, the female students showed permissive attitudes toward reasons for abortion under the maternal & child health law, disapproval attitudes toward socioeconomic reasons for abortion, and neutral attitudes toward abortion by normatively unqualified reasons. Students also showed high levels of needs for abortion prevention policies. Finally, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that female students' attitudes toward reasons for which abortion is permitted significantly predicted levels of needs for abortion prevention policies, after controlling their sciodemographic characteristics. The implications of the study results are discussed.
Keywords
reasons for which abortion is permitted; abortion prevention policies; female students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mitchell, C.(2010). Community support for unwed mothers and their children: Key elements of successful programs and policies. 가족여성포럼 2010-19. 경기도 양육미혼모부자 가족지원을 위한 정책방안. 경기도 가족여성연구원.
2 National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy(1999). What about the teens: A focus group report.
3 Shin, J.(2011). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of the teenage pregnancy. Unpublished master thesis. Korea University, Seoul.
4 Shin, K., Park, H., Bae, K., & Cha, C.(2010). Sexual behavior, health risk behaviors related to reproductive health, and sexual experiences among Korean college students. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 22(6), 624-633.
5 Skinner, S. R., Smith, J., Fenwick, J., Hendriks, J., Fyfe, S. & Kendall, G.(2009). Pregnancy and protection: Perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Australian female adolescents. Women and Birth, 22, 50-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Strickler, J. & Danigelis, N. L.(2002). Changing frameworks in attitudes toward abortion. Sociological Forum, 17(2), 187-201.
7 The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy(2008). Magical thinking, Young adults' attitudes and beliefs about sex, contraception, and unplanned pregnancy, Results from a Public Opinion Survey.
8 대한민국정부(2011). 제 2차 저출산.고령사회기본계회 2011년도 중앙부처 시행계획.
9 보건복지부(2011). 낙태가 줄고 있다! 최근 3년 사이 28% 감소: '인공임신중절 실태조사'결과발표 공청회 개최. 보건복지부 보도자료(2011. 9. 23).
10 보건복지가족부(2010). 불법 인공임신중절예방 종합계획.
11 손명세 외(2008). 부적절한 인공임신중절 예방사업 개발 및 법적 정비방안 연구. 보건복지부.
12 이인영(2005). 낙태죄 입법의 재구성을 위한 논의, 양현아 낙태 죄에서 재생산권으로. 서울: 사람생각.
13 이정념(2010). 낙태 처벌규정의 바람직한 논의방향. 이슈와 논점, 25, 국회입법조사처.
14 Choi, J., Won, J., Chae, S., Park, E., & Seo, G.(2010). Policy issues on abortion in Korea. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
15 Chung, D.(2010). A study on the guarantee of basic human rights of juvenile single mother. Unpublished master thesis. Korea University, Seoul.
16 Han, I., Park, I., & Baek, Y.(2001). A research on risk factors of adolescent sexual behaviors. Korean Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12(1), 138-148.
17 Han, J.(2010). What is the mother safe program? Background and tasks. Korean Journal of Perinatology, 21(1), 15-25.
18 Ho, S.(2009). Sexual knowledge, attitude and sexual behavior of the university students. Unpublished master thesis. Hanyang University, Seoul.
19 Jewell, D., Tacchi, J. & Donovan, J.(2000). Teenage pregnancy: Whose problem is it?. Family Practice, 17, 522-528.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kim, H.(2009). Eine rechtstheoretische diskussion und rechtspolitische studie uber den schwangerschaftsabbruch. 외법논집, 33(3), 647-676.
21 Kweon, H., Chung, H., Ryu, E., & Chung, Y.(1998). A study of sexual attitudes in university students: Q-methodological approach. Journal of the Korean Society of School Health, 11(2), 229-241.
22 김해중.안형식.김순덕.박문일.박춘선.임지은.홍성희.이제숙.김경란.이수경.이선영.김호임.김경훈(2005). 인공임신중절 실태조사 및 종합대책 수 립. 보건복지부.
23 Lee, M., Kim, Y., & Kim, D.(2010). Reviewing socioeconomic reasons for abortion in Korea. Korean Women's Development Institute.
24 United Nations(2007). World Abortion Policies 2007.
25 Yang, S.(2005). A study on the actual condition of teenager's abortion and the better ways of sex education: Targeted at middle and highschoolers in Seoul. Unpublished master thesis. Sungshin Women's University, Seoul.
26 Lee, E., Kim, S., Sohn, M., & Lee, I.(2010). A comparative study on abortion counselling services with emphases on legal procedure. Korean Journal of Medicine and Law, 18(1), 104-127.
27 Lee, I., Choi, G., Cha, S., Park, H., & Lee, J.(2010). A survey on the sexual behavior of adolescents in South Korea: The third survey in 2007. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 53(6), 512-519.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Lee, J.(2008). Uber die gewahrleistung der wirksamkeit von abtreibungsgesetz. 법학논집, 30(2), 143-168.