Browse > Article

The Mediating and Moderating Effects of Teacher Preference on the Relationship between Behavior Problems and Peer Victimization  

Shin, Yoo-Lim (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, The Catholic Univ. of Korea)
Publication Information
Journal of Families and Better Life / v.27, no.5, 2009 , pp. 115-122 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated the mediating and moderating effects of teacher preference on the relationship between behavior problems and peer victimization. The subjects were 520 children in the fifth and sixth grades. Children completed peer nominations that assessed peer victimization. Teachers rated children's internalizing, externalizing problems and teacher preference. The full mediating effect of teacher preference was found in externalizing problems and the partial mediating effect was found in internalizing problems. Moreover, the moderating effect of teacher preference was found only in internalizing problems, which suggests that high teacher preference protects internalizing problems from peer victimization.
Keywords
peer victimization; teacher preference; externalizing problems; internalizing problems;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 정정호(2000). 또래폭력 피해경험에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문
2 Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions in Child Development, 57, 61-80
4 White, K. J., Sherman, M. D., & Jones, M. (1996). Children's perceptions of behavior problem peers: Effects of teacher feedback and peer-reputed status. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 53-72   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategics, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182   DOI
6 Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children's interpersonal behaviors and the teacher-child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934-946   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Rubin, J. H., Chen, A., & Hymel, S. (1993) Socioemotional characteristics of withdrawn and aggressive children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 518-534
8 양원경.도현심(1999). 또래수용성 및 또래 괴롭힘과 청소년의 자아 존중감 간의 관계. 아동학회지, 20, 223-237
9 Chang, L., Liu, H., Wen, Z, Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Li, H., & Farver, J. M. (2007). Mediating and moderating effects of teacher preference on the relations between students' social behaviors and peer acceptance. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 53, 603-630   DOI
10 Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relation between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1-24   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Chang, L., Liu, H., Wen, Z., Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2004). Mediating teacher liking and moderating authoritative teachering on Chinese adolescents' perceptions of antisocial and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 369-380   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Gorman, A. H., Kim, J., & Schimmelbusch, A. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 143-165   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Schwartz, D., Farver, J., Chang, L., & Lee-Shin, Y. (2002). Victimization in South Korean children's peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 113-125   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Wentzel. K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763   DOI   ScienceOn
15 박영신.김의철(2004). 청소년의 인간관계와 일탈행동: 부모-자녀관계, 친구관계, 교사 학생관계를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 10, 87-115
16 이춘재.곽금주(2000). 집단 따돌림 경험 유형에 따른 자기개념과 사회적 지지. 한국심리학회지, 13, 65-80
17 서미정.김경연(2005). 아동의 개인적 변인이 또래괴롭힘에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 43, 187-201   과학기술학회마을
18 Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C. C. (1994). Influence of the teacher-student relationship on childhood conduct problems: A Prospective study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 173-184
19 Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. UK: Blackwell
20 Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experience and social self-perceptions: A sequential model. Developmental Psychology, 33, 135-145   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Schwartz, D., McFadyen-Ketchum, Dodge, K. D., Petit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (1998). Peer group victimization as a predictor of children's behavior problems and at home and in school. New Directions in Child Development, 57, 61-80
22 Taylor, A. R. (1989). Predictors of peer rejection in early elementary grades: roles of problem behavior academic achievement, and teacher preference. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 360-365   DOI
23 Rubin, H. R., Wojslawowicz, H. C., Rose-Krasnorm L., Booth-Laforce, C., & Burgess, K. B. (2006). The best friendships of shy/withdrawn children: Prevalence, stability, and relationship quality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 139-153   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Xu, Y., Farver, J. M., Schwartz, D., & Chang, L. (2004). Social network and aggressive behavior in Chinese children. International Journal of ehavioral Development, 28, 401-410   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL 14-18, YSR, TRF Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont