Browse > Article

Study of a Policy Plan for Vitalizing a family Leisure  

Yoon, So-Young (Leisure Policy Research Center, Korea Culture & Tourism Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Families and Better Life / v.27, no.4, 2009 , pp. 189-201 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to solve following problems by a family leisure as the problem of a single person in seclusion type, teenager-children being addicted to game, the disconnection of culture inheritance among inter-generation, the elder being isolated from leisure, the increase of the children using a key to go into home alone, the problem of a gender discrimination. This study defines the policy for a family leisure as "policy that ultimately creates the happiness of family, prevents the family problem and deals with it, through the leisure activities that are suitable to family life cycle". It also considers some other important properties(equality, gender and family life cycle, space) besides the constitution and function of family leisure. To create the happiness of family, the direction of the policy for a family leisure heads toward the positive function such as unification, creativity, and psychological stability of family members. At this point, the object of the policy for a family leisure is a unit of the family and it focuses on the level of interaction and positive function development between family members, being beyond the concept of family activity. Therefore, the policy that is to vitalize a family leisure must contain the interaction and positive function between the family members. Hereupon, to vitalize a family leisure, this study leads above-mentioned subjects based on programming, running leisure facility, information system, experts, social awareness, and supporting to the various family. Specialty, the process of leading these subjects is connected to the suggestion of the concrete program and then, is to result in supporting the program development for the essential leisure policy.
Keywords
family leisure; leisure policy; family problem; family activity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김정운(2003). 휴테크 성공학. 명진출판사
2 문화관광부 한국문화관광연구원(2007). 2007 여가백서
3 문화체육관광부(2008). 국민여가진흥 중장기계획 수립을 위한 연구보고서
4 송혜림(2008). 통합적 가정정책: 선언과 실천. 한국가정관리학회 43차 춘계학술대회 자료집, 3-18
5 양영아(1996). 중산층의 가족여가활동 실태와 요구 조사 연구. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
6 윤소영 김현(2008). 직장영역의 가족친화제도 도입과 성과, 그리고 과제. 한국가족자원경영학회지, 12(2), 141-152
7 지영숙(1999). 가족여가의 생활적 의미 연구. 한국가족자원경 영학회지, 3(1), 83-94
8 최석호(2004). 가족과 여가. 여가학연구, 1(3), 45-56
9 홍성화(2003). 가족단위 여가활동 참여가 가족기능에 미치는 영향: 주5일 근무제 실시집단을 중심으로. 여가학연구, 1(2), 57-71
10 홍성희(1996). 주부의 가족여가활동 참여도와 생활만족도에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 34(2), 71-84   과학기술학회마을
11 Holman, T. B., & Jacquart. M.(1988). Leisure-activity patterns and marital satisfaction: a further test. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 69-77   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kelly(1983). Leisure Identiry and Interation. George Allen & Unwin
13 Orthner, D. K. & Mancini, J. A.(1990). Leisure impacts on family interaction and cohesion. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(2), 125-137
14 Parnicka, U.(1995). Leisure time and active recreation in families with pre-school age children in Biala Podlaska. World Leisure and Recreation Journal, 37(3), 42-54   DOI
15 Shaw, S. M.(1985). Gender and Leisure: Inequality in the distribution of leisure time. Journal of Leisure Research, 17(4), 266-282
16 중앙건강가정지원센터(2007). 건강가정사업 성과분석 및 발전 방향 연구. 중앙건강가정지원센터 보고서
17 여성부(2002), 건전가족문화 정립을 위한 여가활용방안 연구, 고려대학교 한국사회연구소 보고서
18 윤소영 윤지영(2003). 가족여가의 활동유형 및 본질에 대한연구. 여가학연구, 1(2), 11-30
19 지영숙 이태진(2001). 도시가정의 가족여가 유형-자녀교육 기를 중심으로-. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(2), 153-165
20 윤소영 차경욱(2004). 여가인식, 활동유형 및 여가제약의 세 대간 비교. 한국가정관리학회지, 22(2), 97-107
21 한국문화관광연구원(2008). 여가 그리고 정책. 대왕사
22 정국현(2006). 가족의 여가스포츠활동 참가가 세대간 커뮤니 케이션 촉진 및 세대차이, 세대갈등 그리고 갈등대처행 동에 미치는 영향. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 19(3), 373-392
23 Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B, P.(2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations, 50(3), 281-289. http://www.culture.gov.uk/breakout/   DOI   ScienceOn
24 조희금 송혜림 공인숙 이승미 이완정(2008). 가정생활복지론. 신정출판사
25 Aron, A. & Aron, E. N.(1986). Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction. Hemisphere
26 Hochschild, A. R.(1997). The Time Bind : when work becomes home and home becomes work. NY: Metropolitan Books
27 Horna, J. L.(1989). The leisure component of the parent role. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(3), 228-241
28 이기영 김외숙 구혜령(1995). 부부의 공유여가시간과 결 혼만족도. 대한가정학회지, 33(3), 113-126
29 Freysinger, V. J.(1994). Leisure with children and parental satisfaction: Further evidence of sex difference in the experience of adult roles and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(3), 212-226
30 Shaw, S. M.(1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: towards a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(1), 1-8
31 김외숙 이기춘(1992). 도시기혼여성의 여가활동 유형. 한국 가정관리학회지, 20, 61-74
32 여성가족부(2006), 가족실태조사 보고서
33 Orthner, D. K.(1975). Leisure activity patterns and marital satisfaction over the marital career. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37(1), 91-102   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Rapoport, Rhona & Rapoport, Robert N.(1975). Leisure and the family life cycle, beyond palpable mass demand . Routledge & Kegan Paul
35 문숙재 윤소영 차경욱 천혜정(2005). 여가문화와 가족. 신정
36 김혜영(2004). 가족여가와 젠더. 가족과 문화, 16(2), 127-166
37 정민영(2001). 중년남녀의 여가활동 유형과 효과에 관한 비교 연구. 한국여가레크리에이션, 21, 227-240
38 한국문화관광연구원(2006, 2007, 2008). 국민여가활동조사 원자료
39 한국문화관광연구원(2007). 정책대상으로서의 여가의 영역 및 추진체계
40 Shaw, S. M., & Dawson, D.(2001). Purposive leisure: examing parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Sciences, 23, 217-231   DOI   ScienceOn
41 문화관광부 한국문화관광정책연구원(2006). 2006 여가백서
42 한국문화정책연구원(2004). 여가시설 최소기준 수립을 위한 기초연구
43 Bittman, M. & Wajcman, J.(1999). The rush hour the quality of leisure time and gender equity. SPRC Discussion Paper, .97, 1-39
44 Mattingly, M. J. & Bianchi, S. M.(2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: the US experience. Social Force, 81(3), 1001-1030
45 Shaw, S. M.(1997). Controversies and contradictions in family leisure: an analysis of conflicting paradigms. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(1), 98-112   ScienceOn