Browse > Article

Young Chilldren's Causal Reasoning on Psychology and Biology : Focusing on the Interaction between Domain-specificty and Domain-generality  

Kim, Ji-Hyun (Dept. of Child Development & Family Studies, Seoul National Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of Families and Better Life / v.26, no.5, 2008 , pp. 333-354 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the role of domain-specific causal mechanism information and domain-general conditional probability in young children's causal reasoning on psychology and biology. Participants were 121 3-year-olds and 121 4-year-olds recruited from seven childcare centers in Seoul, Kyonggi Province, and Busan. After participants watched moving pictures on psychological and biological phenomena, they were asked to choose appropriate cause and justify their choices. Results of this study were as follows: First, young children made different inferences according to domain-specific causal mechanisms. Second, the developmental level of causal mechanisms has a gap between psychology and biology, and biological knowledge was proved to be separate from psychological knowledge during the preschool period. Third, young children's causal reasoning was different depending on the interaction effect of domain-specific mechanisms and domain-general conditional probability: children could make more inferences based on domain-specific causal mechanisms if conditional probability between domain-appropriate cause and effect was evident. To conclude, it can be inferred that the role of domain-specific causal mechanisms and domain-general conditional probability is not competitive but complementary in young children's causal reasoning.
Keywords
causal reasoning; domain-specific causal mechanism; domain-general conditional probability; psychology; biology;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 변은희(2005). 생물지식의 발달: 생물/무생물 구분과 인과기제. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 18(3), 41-62
2 정명숙(2006). 심인성 신체증상에 대한 이해의 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 19(3), 67-88
3 Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M.(1985). Children talk about the mind. N.Y.: Oxford University Press
4 Dunn, J., & Brown, J. R.(1993). Early conversations about causality: Content, pragmatics and developmental change. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 107-123   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hickling, A. K., & Wellman, H. M.(2001). The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 668-683   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Inagaki, K.(1997). Emerging distinctions between naive biology and naive psychology. In H. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (pp. 27-44). San Francisco, FL: Jossey-Bass
7 Keil, F. C.(1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 234-262). N.Y.: Oxford University Press
8 Schulz, L. E., & Gopnik, A.(2004). Causal learning across domains. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 162-176   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Spelke, E.(2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1230-1243   DOI   ScienceOn
10 김영숙.이현진.김경아(2005). 일상생활의 대화에서 나타난 한국 아동의 인과적 설명: 물리, 생물, 심리지식을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 18(3), 21-40
11 Gelman, R.(2000). Domain specificity and variability in cognitive development. Child Development, 71, 854-856   DOI   ScienceOn
12 박선미.이현진.김혜리.정명숙.양혜영.변은희.김경아.김영숙(2005a). 한국 아동의 물리, 심리, 생물지식의 발달(I): 인지발달은 영역특정적인가? 한국심리학회지: 일반, 24(1), 23-47
13 박선미.이현진.김혜리.정명숙.양혜영.변은희.김경아.김영숙(2005b). 한국 아동의 물리, 심리, 생물지식의 발달(II): 인지발달은 이론발달인가? 한국심리학회지: 일반, 24(1), 49-74
14 Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M.(1992). Preschoolers' questions and parents' explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7, 213-233   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A.(1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299-352   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Glymour, C.(2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 620-629   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G.(1996). Young children's recognition of commonalities between animals and plants. Child Development, 67, 2823-2840   DOI
18 Carey, S., & Spelke, E.(1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169-200). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press
19 Gopnik, A.(2000). Explanation as orgasm and the drive for causal knowledge: The function, evolution, and phenomenology of the theory formation system. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 299-323). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20 Keil, F. C.(1981). Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development. Psychological Review, 88(3), 197-227   DOI
21 Keil, F. C.(1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169-200). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press
22 Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A.(1998). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & D. Kuhn and R. Siegler (vol Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (5th Ed., pp. 523-57). N.Y.: Johns Wiley & Sons
23 Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K., & Schult, C. A.(1997). Young children's psychological, physical, and biological explanations. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena (pp. 7-25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
24 Backscheider, A. G., Shatz, M., & Gelman, S. A.(1993). Preschoolers' ability to distinguish living kinds as a function of regrowth. Child Development, 64, 1242-1257   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N.(1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26 Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A.(2007). Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 186-196   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Shultz, T. R.(1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47(1, Serial No. 194), 1-51
28 Carey, S.(1995). On the origin of causal understanding. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 268-302). N.Y.: Oxford University Press
29 Sobel, D. M.(2001). Examining the coherence of young children's understanding of causality: Evidence from inference, explanation, and counterfactual reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkely
30 Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Kushnir, T.(2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 3-32
31 Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R.(1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209-254). N.Y.: Academic Press
32 Carey, S.(1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books
33 김지현.이순형(2008.05). 영역특정론과 영역일반론에 따른 유아의 인과추론: 물리, 심리 영역을 중심으로. 한국아동학회 2008년 춘계학술대회 자료집, 156
34 Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G.(1993). Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. Child Development, 64, 1534-1549   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Notaro, P. C., Gelman, S. A., & Zimmerman, M. A.(2002). Biases in reasoning about the consequences of psychogenic bodily reactions: Domain boundaries in cognitive development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 48(4), 427-449   DOI
36 Bonawitz, E. B., Griffiths. T. L., & Schulz, L.(2006, July). Modeling cross-domain causal learning in preschoolers as Bayesian inference. Oral presented in the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
37 Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M.(1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 257-293). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press
38 Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. E.(2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 371-377   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Koslowski, B., Spilton, D., & Snipper, A.(1981). Children's beliefs about instances of mechanical and electrical causation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 189-210   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gopnik, A.(2004). Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28, 303-333   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Wellman, H. M.(1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
42 Shultz, T. R., & Mendelson, R.(1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Development, 46, 394-399   DOI   ScienceOn
43 김경아.이현진.김영숙(2006). 심리, 물리, 생물 현상에 대한 아동의 지식 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 19(1), 1-27
44 Hickling, A. K., & Gelman, S. A.(1995). How does your garden grow?: Early conceptualization of seeds and their place in the plant growth cycle. Child Development, 66, 856-876   DOI   ScienceOn