Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00451

Topographical measurement of the attachments of the central band of the interosseous membrane on interosseous crests of the radius and ulna  

Jang, Suk-Hwan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Kim, Kyung-Whan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zion Hospital)
Jang, Hyo Seok (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Kim, Yeong-Seok (Department of Anatomy, Inje University)
Kim, Hojin (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Kim, Youngbok (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University)
Publication Information
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow / v.24, no.4, 2021 , pp. 253-260 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: To suggest a reasonable isometric point based on the anatomical consistency of interosseous membrane (IOM) attachment in association with topographic characteristics of the interosseous crests, the footprints of the central band (CB) of the IOM on the radial and ulnar interosseous crests (RIC and UIC) were measured. Methods: We measured the distance from the CB footprints from each apex of both interosseous crests in 14 cadavers and the angles between the forearm axis of rotation (AOR) and the distal slopes of the RIC and UIC in 33 volunteers. Results: The CB footprints lay on the downslope of both interosseous crests with its upper margin on average 3-mm proximal from the RIC's apex consistently in the radial length, showing normality (p>0.05), and on average 16-mm distal from the UIC's apex on the ulna without satisfying normality (p<0.05). The average angle between the UIC's distal slope and the AOR was 1.3°, and the RIC's distal slope to the AOR was 14.0°, satisfying the normality tests (p>0.05), and there was no side-to-side difference in both forearms (p<0.05). Conclusions: The CB attached to the downslope just distal to the RIC's apex constrains the radius to the UIC that coincides with the AOR of the forearm circumduction, maintaining itself both isometrically and isotonically.
Keywords
Interosseous crest; Radius; Ulna; Interosseous membrane; Central band;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Skahen JR 3rd, Palmer AK, Werner FW, Fortino MD. The interosseous membrane of the forearm: anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22:981-5.   DOI
2 Chao EY, Morrey BF. Three-dimensional rotation of the elbow. J Biomech 1978;11:57-73.   DOI
3 Kapandji A. Biomechanics of pronation and supination of the forearm. Hand Clin 2001;17:111-22.   DOI
4 Hollister AM, Gellman H, Waters RL. The relationship of the interosseous membrane to the axis of rotation of the forearm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(298):272-6.
5 Soubeyrand M, Assabah B, Begin M, Laemmel E, Dos Santos A, Creze M. Pronation and supination of the hand: anatomy and biomechanics. Hand Surg Rehabil 2017;36:2-11.   DOI
6 Mori K. Experimental study on rotation of the forearm--functional anatomy of the interosseous membrane. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1985;59:611-22.
7 Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y. In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24:245-8.   DOI
8 Hotchkiss RN, An KN, Sowa DT, Basta S, Weiland AJ. An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14(2 Pt 1):256-61.   DOI
9 Poitevin LA. Anatomy and biomechanics of the interosseous membrane: its importance in the longitudinal stability of the forearm. Hand Clin 2001;17:97-110.   DOI
10 Forster RI, Sharkey NA, Szabo RM. Forearm interosseous ligament isometry. J Hand Surg Am 1999;24:538-45.   DOI
11 Pfaeffle HJ, Fischer KJ, Srinivasa A, Manson T, Woo SL, Tomaino M. A model of stress and strain in the interosseous ligament of the forearm based on fiber network theory. J Biomech Eng 2006;128:725-32.   DOI
12 Adams JE, Culp RW, Osterman AL. Interosseous membrane reconstruction for the Essex-Lopresti injury. J Hand Surg Am 2010;35:129-36.   DOI
13 Moritomo H, Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: length change of ligaments during forearm rotation. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34:685-91.
14 Noda K, Goto A, Murase T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Moritomo H. Interosseous membrane of the forearm: an anatomical study of ligament attachment locations. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34:415-22.
15 Chandler JW, Stabile KJ, Pfaeffle HJ, Li ZM, Woo SL, Tomaino MM. Anatomic parameters for planning of interosseous ligament reconstruction using computer-assisted techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:111-6.   DOI
16 Marcotte AL, Osterman AL. Longitudinal radioulnar dissociation: identification and treatment of acute and chronic injuries. Hand Clin 2007;23:195-208.   DOI
17 Adams JE. Forearm instability: anatomy, biomechanics, and treatment options. J Hand Surg Am 2017;42:47-52.   DOI
18 Nakamura T, Yabe Y, Horiuchi Y, Seki T, Yamazaki N. Normal kinematics of the interosseous membrane during forearm pronation-supination: a three-dimensional MRI study. Hand Surg 2000;5:1-10.   DOI
19 Birkbeck DP, Failla JM, Hoshaw SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schaffler M. The interosseous membrane affects load distribution in the forearm. J Hand Surg Am 1997;22:975-80.   DOI
20 LaStayo PC, Lee MJ. The forearm complex: anatomy, biomechanics and clinical considerations. J Hand Ther 2006;19:137-44.   DOI
21 Meals CG, Forthman CL, Segalman KA. Suture-button reconstruction of the interosseous membrane. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5:179-83.   DOI
22 Manson TT, Pfaeffle HJ, Herdon JH, Tomaino MM, Fischer KJ. Forearm rotation alters interosseous ligament strain distribution. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:1058-63.   DOI