The Influence of Health Perception on Shoulder Outcome Measure Scores |
Hardy, Richard E.
(Department of Sports Medicine, Heartland Orthopedic Specialists)
Sungur, Engin (Division of Science and Mathematics, University of Minnesota Morris) Butler, Christopher (Division of Science and Mathematics, University of Minnesota Morris) Brand, Jefferson C. (Department of Sports Medicine, Heartland Orthopedic Specialists) |
1 | Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RW. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):277-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. DOI |
2 | Gartsman GM, Brinker MR, Khan M, Karahan M. Self-assessment of general health status in patients with five common shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(3):228-37. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90050-7. DOI |
3 | Sallay PI, Reed L. The measurement of normative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):622-7. doi: 10.1016/S105827460300209X. DOI |
4 | Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128-46. DOI |
5 | Kocher MS, Horan MP, Briggs KK, Richardson TR, O'Holleran J, Hawkins RJ. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):2006-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01624. DOI |
6 | Michener LA, Leggin BG. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):68-76. DOI |
7 | Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(4):641-9. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.032. |
8 | Swiontkowski MF, Buckwalter JA, Keller RB, Haralson R. The outcomes movement in orthopaedic surgery: where we are and where we should go. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(5):732-40. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199905000-00016. |
9 | Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Sojbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022. DOI |
10 | Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1109-20. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030. DOI |
11 | Ban I, Troelsen A, Christiansen DH, Svendsen SW, Kristensen MT. Standardised test protocol (Constant Score) for evaluation of functionality in patients with shoulder disorders. Dan Med J. 2013;60(4):A4608. |
12 | Rocourt MH, Radlinger L, Kalberer F, et al. Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.024. DOI |
13 | Clarke MG, Dewing CB, Schroder DT, Solomon DJ, Provencher MT. Normal shoulder outcome score values in the young, active adult. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):424-8. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.009. DOI |
14 | Chalmers PN, Verma NN. How can we improve outcomes assessment? Orthopedics. 2015;38(10):594-6. doi:10.3928/01477447-20151002-02. DOI |
15 | Yian EH, Ramappa AJ, Arneberg O, Gerber C. The Constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.003. DOI |
16 | Constant CR. Age related recovery of shoulder function after injury [thesis]. Cork: University College Cork; 1986. |
17 | Johansson KM, Adolfsson LE. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the strength test in the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(3):273-8. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.001. DOI |
18 | Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60(6):821-36. doi: 10.1177/00131640021970934. DOI |
19 | Green SB. How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26(3):499-510. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7. DOI |
20 | Katolik LI, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Hayden JK, Bach BR. Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(3):279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009. DOI |
21 | Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, et al. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(10):1257-67. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9409-3. DOI |
22 | Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(6):587-94. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096. DOI |
23 | Elliott TE, Renier CM, Palcher JA. Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: correlations and predictive value of the SF-36. Pain Med. 2003;4(4):331-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2003.03040.x. DOI |
24 | Bergman S, Jacobsson LT, Herrstrom P, Petersson IF. Health status as measured by SF-36 reflects changes and predicts outcome in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a 3-year follow up study in the general population. Pain. 2004;108(1-2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.013. DOI |
25 | Dawson J, Linsell L, Zondervan K, et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(4):497-504. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh086. DOI |