Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2019.22.1.16

Patient-specific Guides Using 3-dimensional Reconstruction Provide Accuracy and Reproducibility in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty  

Yoon, Jong Pil (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Kim, Dong Hyun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Jung, Jae Wook (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Lee, Chang-Hwa (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Min, Seunggi (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Lee, Hyun Joo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Kim, Hee-June (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow / v.22, no.1, 2019 , pp. 16-23 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate whether the use of our novel patient-specific guide (PSG) with 3-dimensional reconstruction in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) would allow accurate and reliable implantation of the glenoid and humeral components. Methods: 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. The PSG group (n=10) and conventional group (n=10) was evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of implant positioning between before and after surgery on the computed tomography image. Results: The superoinferior and anteroposterior offset in the glenoid component were $0.42{\pm}0.07$, $0.50{\pm}0.08$ in the conventional group and $0.45{\pm}0.03$, $0.46{\pm}0.02$ in the PSG group. The inclination and version angles were $-1.93^{\circ}{\pm}4.31^{\circ}$, $2.27^{\circ}{\pm}5.91^{\circ}$ and $0.46^{\circ}{\pm}0.02^{\circ}$, $3.38^{\circ}{\pm}2.79^{\circ}$. The standard deviation showed a smaller difference in the PSG group. The anteroposterior and lateromedial humeral canal center offset in the humeral component were $0.45{\pm}0.12$, $0.48{\pm}0.15$ in the conventional group and $0.46{\pm}0.59$ (p=0.794), $0.46{\pm}0.06$ (p=0.702) in the PSG group. The PSG showed significantly better humeral stem alignment. Conclusions: The use of PSGs with 3-dimensional reconstruction reduces variabilities in glenoid and humerus component positions and prevents extreme positioning errors in RTSA.
Keywords
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Patient-specific guide; Glenoid component; Humeral component; Positioning;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):388-95. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14024.
2 Bohsali KI, Bois AJ, Wirth MA. Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(3):256-69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00935.   DOI
3 Boileau P, Watkinson DJ, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):147S-61S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.006.   DOI
4 Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi AV Jr. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6.   DOI
5 Victor J, Premanathan A. Virtual 3D planning and patient specific surgical guides for osteotomies around the knee: a feasibility and proof-of-concept study. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(11 Suppl A):153-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32950.   DOI
6 Hendel MD, Bryan JA, Barsoum WK, et al. Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(23):2167-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01209.   DOI
7 Throckmorton TW, Gulotta LV, Bonnarens FO, et al. Patientspecific targeting guides compared with traditional instrumentation for glenoid component placement in shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-surgeon study in 70 arthritic cadaver specimens. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(6):965-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.013.   DOI
8 Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(4):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.014.   DOI
9 Edwards TB, Gartsman GM, O'Connor DP, Sarin VK. Safety and utility of computer-aided shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(3):503-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.10.005.   DOI
10 Verborgt O, De Smedt T, Vanhees M, Clockaerts S, Parizel PM, Van Glabbeek F. Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.014.   DOI
11 Suero EM, Citak M, Lo D, Krych AJ, Craig EV, Pearle AD. Use of a custom alignment guide to improve glenoid component position in total shoulder arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(12):2860-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2177-1.   DOI
12 Frankle MA, Teramoto A, Luo ZP, Levy JC, Pupello D. Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: classification and surgical implications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):874-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.013.   DOI
13 Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. Long term functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(6):583-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.03.025.   DOI
14 Chalmers PN, Rahman Z, Romeo AA, Nicholson GP. Early dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(5):737-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.015.   DOI
15 Gutierrez S, Walker M, Willis M, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035.   DOI
16 Levy JC, Everding NG, Frankle MA, Keppler LJ. Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(10):1563-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.051.   DOI
17 Barrett WP, Franklin JL, Jackins SE, Wyss CR, Matsen FA 3rd. Total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(6):865-72.   DOI
18 Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. TPAMI. 1992;14(2):239-56. doi: 10.1109/34.121791.   DOI
19 Maurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW, et al. Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.010.   DOI
20 Friedman RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(7):1032-7.   DOI
21 Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation in "reverse" total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):162S-7S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.030.   DOI
22 Gerber C, Pennington SD, Nyffeler RW. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(5):284-95.   DOI
23 Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss T. Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2544-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1881-3.   DOI
24 Virani NA, Harman M, Li K, Levy J, Pupello DR, Frankle MA. In vitro and finite element analysis of glenoid bone/baseplate interaction in the reverse shoulder design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(3):509-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.003.   DOI
25 Hopkins AR, Hansen UN, Amis AA, Emery R. The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(6):668-75. doi: 10.1016/S1058274604001399.   DOI
26 Gulotta LV, Choi D, Marinello P, et al. Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(9):1121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.027.   DOI
27 Walch G, Vezeridis PS, Boileau P, Deransart P, Chaoui J. Threedimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(2):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.029.   DOI
28 Gauci MO, Boileau P, Baba M, Chaoui J, Walch G. Patientspecific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2016;98(8):1080-5.doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37257.   DOI
29 Lau SC, Keith PPA. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(1):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.004.   DOI
30 Li X, Knutson Z, Choi D, et al. Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(6):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.013.   DOI