Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2011.14.2.253

The Current State of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty  

Oh, Joo-Han (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Song, Byung-Wook (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Publication Information
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow / v.14, no.2, 2011 , pp. 253-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the present article is to help orthopedic surgeons better understand the basic principles of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty, and to help them perform the best surgical technique for reconstruction. Materials and Methods: In this article, we reviewed in depth current biomechanics, indications & contraindications, surgical techniques, complications and outcomes of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. Additionally, we discussed current issues relevant to total shoulder arthroplasty such as whether a keeled or a pegged glenoid should be used. Results and Conclusion: A thorough understanding of the biomechanics of total shoulder arthroplasty, and the technical details and problems in implantation, are critical to provide the best functional outcome and to avoid the risk of complications.
Keywords
Total shoulder arthroplasty; Current concept;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Edwards TB, Kadakia NR, Boulahia A, et al. A comparison of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:207-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cil A, Veillette CJ, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Sperling JW, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survivorship of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:143-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Martin SD, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS. Uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1284-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:604-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Fox TJ, Cil A, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Schleck CD, Cofield RH. Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18:859-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Wang VM, Krishnan R, Ugwonali OF, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, Ateshian GA. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel glenoid design in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:129S-40S.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Nuttall D, Haines JF, Trail IA. The effect of the offset humeral head on the micromovement of pegged glenoid components: a comparative study using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:757-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Walch G, Badet R, Boulahia A, Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:756-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Gerber C, Yian EH, Pfirrmann CA, Zumstein MA, Werner CM. Subscapularis muscle function and structure after total shoulder replacement with lesser tuberosity osteotomy and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1739-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Qureshi S, Hsiao A, Klug RA, Lee E, Braman J, Flatow EL. Subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: results with lesser tuberosity osteotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:68-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Campbell JT, Moore RS, Iannotti JP, Norris TR, Williams GR. Periprosthetic humeral fractures: mechanisms of fracture and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:406-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ricchetti ET, Williams Jr GR. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? Indications, Technique, and Results. Oper Tech in Orthop. 2011;21:28-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Nyffeler RW, Meyer D, Sheikh R, Koller BJ, Gerber C. The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:106-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Brems J. Rehabilitation After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts. Seminars in Arthroplasty. 2007;18:55-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Current Concepts Review: Complications of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2279-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Anglin C, Wyss UP, Pichora DR. Mechanical testing of shoulder prostheses and recommendations for glenoid design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:323-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Anglin C, Wyss UP, Nyffeler RW, Gerber C. Loosening performance of cemented glenoid prosthesis design pairs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16: 144-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Edwards TB, Labriola JE, Stanley RJ, O'Connor DP, Elkousy HA, Gartsman GM. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:251-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Gartsman GM, Elkousy HA, Warnock KM, Edwards TB, O'Connor DP. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:252-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:726-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Boileau P, Avidor C, Krishnan SG, Walch G, Kempf JF, Mole D. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11: 351-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Castagna A, Randelli M, Garofalo R, Maradei L, Giardella A, Borroni M. Mid-term results of a metalbacked glenoid component in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1410-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Fucentese SF, Costouros JG, Kuhnel SP, Gerber C. Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented softmetal- backed glenoid component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:624-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Karduna AR, Williams GR, Williams JL, Iannotti JP. Joint stability after total shoulder arthroplasty in a cadaver model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997;6:506-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Boileau P, Mole D, Adeleine P. The influence of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84: 2186-91.   DOI
26 Krueger FJ. A vitallium replica arthroplasty on the shoulder; a case report of aseptic necrosis of the proximal end of the humerus. Surgery. 1951;30:1005-11.
27 Neer CS, 2nd. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37:215-28.   DOI
28 Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:857-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Pearl ML, Volk AG. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:320-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Pearl ML, Volk AG. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:286-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Roberts SN, Foley AP, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP. The geometry of the humeral head and the design of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:647-50.   DOI
32 Neer CS, 2nd. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56:1-13.   DOI