1 |
Pearl ML: Proximal humeral anatomy in the shoulder arthroplasty: Implication for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 99S-104S, 2005.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Pearl ML, Kurutz S: Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81: 660-671, 1999.
DOI
|
3 |
Roche C, Angibaud L, Flurin PH, Wright T, Fulkerson E, Zuckerman J: Anatomic validation of an anatomic shoulder system. Bulletin of Hospital for Joint Diseases, 63: 93-97, 2006.
|
4 |
Scalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP: Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional CT scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 328-335, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti J: The threedimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 487-491, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Iannotti JP: The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 10: 399-409, 2001.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA: replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: A radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16: 111S-116S, 2007.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C: Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 442: 121-130, 2006.
DOI
|
9 |
Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP: Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 85-90, 2005.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HAC, Gerber C: Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86: 575-580, 2004.
|
11 |
Hertel R, Ballmer FT: Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 11: 331-338, 2002.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP: Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 471-478, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Delude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA: An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16: 477-483. 2007.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA: The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77: 555-563, 1995.
|
15 |
Iannotti JP, Spencer EE, Winter U, Deffenbaugh D, Williams GR: Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 111S-121S, 2005.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans B, Misra S: The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74: 491-500, 1997.
|
17 |
Iannotti JP, Williams GR: Biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint: Influence on shoulder arthroplasty. In; Iannotti JP, Williams GR ed. Disorders of the shoulder: Diagnosis and management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 633-653, 2007.
|
18 |
Jeong J, Bryan J, Iannotti JP: Effect of a variable neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg, 91: 1932-1941. 2009.
DOI
ScienceOn
|